Asus TUF Z390M-PRO GAMING

Performance Results

Benchmarks - missing SSD
Gaming
Gaming 55%
Gunboat
Desktop
Desktop 96%
Nuclear submarine
Workstation
Workstation 48%
Yacht
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing way above expectations (91st percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 9 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components. This PC is likely operated by a technical master!
ProcessorWith an outstanding single core score, this CPU is the cat's whiskers: It demolishes everyday tasks such as web browsing, office apps and audio/video playback. Additionally this processor can handle typical workstation, and even moderate server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 102%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is outstanding.
Graphics50.7% is a reasonable 3D score (RTX 2060S = 100%). This GPU can handle the majority of recent games but it will struggle with resolutions greater than 1080p at ultra detail levels. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Memory16GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's more than sufficient for nearly all games. 16GB also allows for very large file and system caches, software development and batch photo editing/processing.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.
Sub-optimal background CPU (11%). High background CPU reduces benchmark accuracy. How to reduce background CPU.
Run History
MotherboardAsus TUF Z390M-PRO GAMING  (all builds)
Memory12.3 GB free of 16 GB @ 3.6 GHz
Display1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit kleuren
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20200415
Uptime0.5 Days
Run DateSep 25 '20 at 11:01
Run Duration126 Seconds
Run User NLD-User
Background CPU 11%
Watch Gameplay How to compare your gameplay

 PC Performing way above expectations (91st percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
Intel Core i5-9600K-$137
LGA1151, 1 CPU, 6 cores, 6 threads
Base clock 3.7 GHz, turbo 4.3 GHz (avg)
Performing way above expectations (94th percentile)
102% Outstanding
Memory 96.1
1-Core 145
2-Core 289
98% 177 Pts
4-Core 578
8-Core 824
88% 701 Pts
64-Core 820
51% 820 Pts
Poor: 82%
This bench: 102%
Great: 103%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
Nvidia RTX 2060-$273
Asus(1043 873F) ≥ 4GB
CLim: 2340 MHz, MLim: 4035 MHz, Ram: 6GB, Driver: 456.38
Relative performance (0th percentile) - GPU OC Guide
50.7% Above average
Lighting 32.2
Reflection 136
Parallax 14.9
26% 61 fps
MRender 164
Gravity 113
Splatting 95.3
98% 124 fps
Poor: 80%
This bench: 50.7%
Great: 97%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Nvme ADATA SX8100NP 512GB
13GB free (System drive)
Firmware: VB411D43 Max speed: PCIe 16,000 MB/s
Relative performance n/a - sequential test incomplete
Read 2,343
Write 395
Mixed 471
229% 1,070 MB/s
4K Read 6.6
4K Write 133
4K Mixed 73.9
175% 71.1 MB/s
DQ Read 1,214
DQ Write 329
DQ Mixed 123
259% 555 MB/s
Poor: 115% Great: 306%
Seagate Expansion+ 4TB
3TB free
Firmware: 9300
SusWrite @10s intervals: 98 122 123 120 116 101 MB/s
Performing above expectations (81st percentile)
61.6% Good
Read 100
Write 120
Mixed 66.3
SusWrite 114
73% 100 MB/s
4K Read 0.9
4K Write 3.9
4K Mixed 0.6
176% 1.8 MB/s
Poor: 16%
This bench: 61.6%
Great: 68%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
HyperX Fury 2666 C16 2x8GB-$75
2 of 4 slots used
16GB DIMM DDR4 clocked @ 3553 MHz
Performing way above expectations (98th percentile)
103% Outstanding
MC Read 41.2
MC Write 41.4
MC Mixed 28.9
106% 37.2 GB/s
SC Read 19.9
SC Write 40
SC Mixed 28.3
84% 29.4 GB/s
Latency 53.7
74% 53.7 ns
Poor: 65%
This bench: 103%
Great: 97%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Typical TUF Z390M-PRO GAMING Builds (Compare 512 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 114%
UFO
Desktop
Desktop 100%
UFO
Workstation
Workstation 105%
UFO

Motherboard: Asus TUF Z390M-PRO GAMING

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 106% - Outstanding Total price: $556
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate countless reddit accounts. UserBenchmark challenges their narrative so they attack our reputation with a co-ordinated charade.
Why don’t PC brands endorse UserBenchmark?
PC brands make a lot of profit on flagships like the 4090, 14900KS, and 7950X3D. We help users get similar real-world performance for less money.
Why don’t youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't pay youtubers, so they don't praise us. Moreover, UserBenchmark's data exposes the youtubers that promote overpriced/inferior products.
Why does UserBenchmark have negative trustpilot reviews?
The 200+ reviews on trustpilot are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users aren't incentivized to back brands.
Why is UserBenchmark popular with users?
Instead of chasing sponsorship with billion-dollar PC brands, we've dedicated 13 years to publishing real-world data which collectively saves our users millions.
The Best.
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $174Nvidia RTX 4060 $293Crucial MX500 250GB $39
Intel Core i5-12400F $120Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-13600K $260Nvidia RTX 4070 $549Samsung 870 Evo 250GB $44
HDDRAMUSB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $37Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $40SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $28Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $48SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $62G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16
If you make a purchase via one of these links, our site may earn a commission
Today's hottest deals
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback