Asus TUF Z390M-PRO GAMING

Performance Results

Benchmarks - missing SSD
Gaming
Gaming 103%
UFO
Desktop
Desktop 93%
Nuclear submarine
Workstation
Workstation 88%
Aircraft carrier
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing above expectations (84th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 16 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
ProcessorWith an outstanding single core score, this CPU is the cat's whiskers: It demolishes everyday tasks such as web browsing, office apps and audio/video playback. Additionally this processor can handle typical workstation, and even moderate server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 98.1%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is excellent.
Graphics107% is an outstanding 3D score, it's the bee's knees. This GPU can handle almost all 3D games at very high resolutions and ultra detail levels.
Memory16GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's more than sufficient for nearly all games. 16GB also allows for very large file and system caches, software development and batch photo editing/processing.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.
Sub-optimal background CPU (12%). High background CPU reduces benchmark accuracy. How to reduce background CPU.
Run History
MotherboardAsus TUF Z390M-PRO GAMING  (all builds)
Memory12.1 GB free of 16 GB @ 2.7 GHz
Display1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit kleuren
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20200415
Uptime0 Days
Run DateSep 24 '20 at 12:16
Run Duration127 Seconds
Run User NLD-User
Background CPU 12%
Watch Gameplay How to compare your gameplay

 PC Performing above expectations (84th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
Intel Core i5-9600K-$137
LGA1151, 1 CPU, 6 cores, 6 threads
Base clock 3.7 GHz, turbo 4.3 GHz (avg)
Performing way above expectations (86th percentile)
98.1% Outstanding
Memory 92.7
1-Core 142
2-Core 283
95% 173 Pts
4-Core 559
8-Core 792
85% 676 Pts
64-Core 809
50% 809 Pts
Poor: 82%
This bench: 98.1%
Great: 103%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
Nvidia RTX 2060-$273
Asus(1043 873F) ≥ 4GB
CLim: 2325 MHz, MLim: 4001 MHz, Ram: 6GB, Driver: 452.06
Performing way above expectations (100th percentile)
107% Outstanding
Lighting 139
Reflection 133
Parallax 129
113% 133 fps
MRender 166
Gravity 112
Splatting 97.5
99% 125 fps
Poor: 80%
This bench: 107%
Great: 97%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Nvme ADATA SX8100NP 512GB
28GB free (System drive)
Firmware: VB411D43 Max speed: PCIe 16,000 MB/s
Relative performance n/a - sequential test incomplete
Read 2,685
Write 1,368
Mixed 1,392
399% 1,815 MB/s
4K Read 53.2
4K Write 115
4K Mixed 68
229% 78.7 MB/s
DQ Read 1,216
DQ Write 292
DQ Mixed 148
266% 552 MB/s
Poor: 115% Great: 306%
Seagate Expansion+ 4TB
3TB free
Firmware: 9300
SusWrite @10s intervals: 130 138 140 138 129 138 MB/s
Performing way above expectations (94th percentile)
67.3% Good
Read 98.3
Write 118
Mixed 73.7
SusWrite 136
78% 106 MB/s
4K Read 0.9
4K Write 3.8
4K Mixed 0.7
186% 1.8 MB/s
Poor: 16%
This bench: 67.3%
Great: 68%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
HyperX Fury 2666 C16 2x8GB-$75
2 of 4 slots used
16GB DIMM DDR4 clocked @ 2666 MHz
Performing as expected (57th percentile)
83% Excellent
MC Read 32.2
MC Write 33.5
MC Mixed 22.5
84% 29.4 GB/s
SC Read 17.7
SC Write 33.8
SC Mixed 24.1
72% 25.2 GB/s
Latency 62.8
64% 62.8 ns
Poor: 65%
This bench: 83%
Great: 97%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Typical TUF Z390M-PRO GAMING Builds (Compare 512 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 114%
UFO
Desktop
Desktop 100%
UFO
Workstation
Workstation 105%
UFO

Motherboard: Asus TUF Z390M-PRO GAMING

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 106% - Outstanding Total price: $556
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate countless reddit accounts. UserBenchmark challenges their narrative so they attack our reputation with a co-ordinated charade.
Why don’t PC brands endorse UserBenchmark?
PC brands make a lot of profit on flagships like the 4090, 14900KS, and 7950X3D. We help users get similar real-world performance for less money.
Why don’t youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't pay youtubers, so they don't praise us. Moreover, our data exposes the youtubers that are paid to promote overpriced/inferior products.
Why does UserBenchmark have negative trustpilot reviews?
The 200+ reviews on trustpilot are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users aren't incentivized to back brands.
Why is UserBenchmark popular with users?
Instead of chasing sponsorship with billion-dollar PC brands, we've spent 13 years publishing real-world data which collectively saves our users millions.
The Best.
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $174Nvidia RTX 4060 $293Crucial MX500 250GB $39
Intel Core i5-12400F $120Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-13600K $260Nvidia RTX 4070 $549Samsung 870 Evo 250GB $44
HDDRAMUSB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $40Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $40SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $28Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $48SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $62G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16
If you make a purchase via one of these links, our site may earn a commission
Today's hottest deals
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback