Asus TUF Z390M-PRO GAMING

Performance Results

Benchmarks - missing SSD
Gaming
Gaming 109%
UFO
Desktop
Desktop 94%
Nuclear submarine
Workstation
Workstation 93%
Nuclear submarine
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing way above expectations (98th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 2 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components. This PC is likely operated by a technical master!
ProcessorWith an outstanding single core score, this CPU is the cat's whiskers: It demolishes everyday tasks such as web browsing, office apps and audio/video playback. Additionally this processor can handle typical workstation, and even moderate server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 102%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is outstanding.
Graphics107% is an outstanding 3D score, it's the bee's knees. This GPU can handle almost all 3D games at very high resolutions and ultra detail levels.
Memory16GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's more than sufficient for nearly all games. 16GB also allows for very large file and system caches, software development and batch photo editing/processing.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.
Run History
MotherboardAsus TUF Z390M-PRO GAMING  (all builds)
Memory12.5 GB free of 16 GB @ 3.6 GHz
Display1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit kleuren
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20200415
Uptime0 Days
Run DateSep 24 '20 at 12:27
Run Duration124 Seconds
Run User NLD-User
Background CPU5%
Watch Gameplay How to compare your gameplay

 PC Performing way above expectations (98th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
Intel Core i5-9600K-$137
LGA1151, 1 CPU, 6 cores, 6 threads
Base clock 3.7 GHz, turbo 4.3 GHz (avg)
Performing way above expectations (94th percentile)
102% Outstanding
Memory 95.3
1-Core 146
2-Core 253
94% 165 Pts
4-Core 584
8-Core 839
89% 711 Pts
64-Core 850
53% 850 Pts
Poor: 82%
This bench: 102%
Great: 103%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
Nvidia RTX 2060-$273
Asus(1043 873F) ≥ 4GB
CLim: 2325 MHz, MLim: 4006 MHz, Ram: 6GB, Driver: 452.06
Performing way above expectations (100th percentile)
107% Outstanding
Lighting 140
Reflection 134
Parallax 7
114% 93.4 fps
MRender 166
Gravity 112
Splatting 97
99% 125 fps
Poor: 80%
This bench: 107%
Great: 97%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Nvme ADATA SX8100NP 512GB
30GB free (System drive)
Firmware: VB411D43 Max speed: PCIe 16,000 MB/s
Relative performance n/a - sequential test incomplete
Read 1,670
Write 658
Mixed 836
231% 1,055 MB/s
4K Read 11.3
4K Write 140
4K Mixed 78.5
192% 76.7 MB/s
DQ Read 1,215
DQ Write 649
DQ Mixed 218
353% 694 MB/s
Poor: 115% Great: 306%
Seagate Expansion+ 4TB
3TB free
Firmware: 9300
SusWrite @10s intervals: 131 138 141 139 135 139 MB/s
Performing way above expectations (97th percentile)
68.4% Good
Read 100
Write 105
Mixed 70.8
SusWrite 137
76% 103 MB/s
4K Read 0.8
4K Write 4.2
4K Mixed 0.6
178% 1.87 MB/s
Poor: 16%
This bench: 68.4%
Great: 68%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
HyperX Fury 2666 C16 2x8GB-$75
2 of 4 slots used
16GB DIMM DDR4 clocked @ 3553 MHz
Performing way above expectations (99th percentile)
107% Outstanding
MC Read 41.8
MC Write 44.5
MC Mixed 28.7
110% 38.3 GB/s
SC Read 20.6
SC Write 45.6
SC Mixed 29.8
91% 32 GB/s
Latency 56.1
71% 56.1 ns
Poor: 65%
This bench: 107%
Great: 97%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Typical TUF Z390M-PRO GAMING Builds (Compare 512 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 114%
UFO
Desktop
Desktop 100%
UFO
Workstation
Workstation 105%
UFO

Motherboard: Asus TUF Z390M-PRO GAMING

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 106% - Outstanding Total price: $556
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate countless reddit accounts. UserBenchmark challenges their narrative so they attack our reputation with a co-ordinated charade.
Why don’t PC brands endorse UserBenchmark?
PC brands make a lot of profit on flagships like the 4090, 14900KS, and 7950X3D. We help users get similar real-world performance for less money.
Why don’t youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't pay youtubers, so they don't praise us. Moreover, our data exposes the youtubers that are paid to promote overpriced/inferior products.
Why does UserBenchmark have negative trustpilot reviews?
The 200+ reviews on trustpilot are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users aren't incentivized to back brands.
Why is UserBenchmark popular with users?
Instead of chasing sponsorship with billion-dollar PC brands, we've spent 13 years publishing real-world data which collectively saves our users millions.
The Best.
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $174Nvidia RTX 4060 $293Crucial MX500 250GB $39
Intel Core i5-12400F $120Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-13600K $260Nvidia RTX 4070 $549Samsung 870 Evo 250GB $44
HDDRAMUSB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $37Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $40SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $28Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $48SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $62G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16
If you make a purchase via one of these links, our site may earn a commission
Today's hottest deals
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback