Asus TUF Z390M-PRO GAMING

Performance Results

Benchmarks - missing SSD
Gaming 92% Nuclear submarine	Desktop 95% Nuclear submarine	Workstation 79% Battleship


PC Status	Overall this PC is performing above expectations (82nd percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 18 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
Processor	With an outstanding single core score, this CPU is the cat's whiskers: It demolishes everyday tasks such as web browsing, office apps and audio/video playback. Additionally this processor can handle typical workstation, and even moderate server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 101%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is outstanding.
Graphics	91.4% is a very good 3D score, it's the business. This GPU can handle recent 3D games at high resolutions and ultra detail levels.
Memory	16GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's more than sufficient for nearly all games. 16GB also allows for very large file and system caches, software development and batch photo editing/processing.
OS Version	Although Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.

Run History

3 years ago, 3 years ago, 3 years ago, 3 years ago, 3 years ago, 3 years ago, 3 years ago, 3 years ago, 3 years ago, 3 years ago, 3 years ago, 3 years ago, 3 years ago, 3 years ago, 3 years ago, 3 years ago, 3 years ago, 3 years ago, 3 years ago, 3 years ago, 3 years ago, 3 years ago, 3 years ago, 3 years ago, 3 years ago, 3 years ago, 3 years ago, 3 years ago, 3 years ago, 3 years ago, 3 years ago, 3 years ago, 3 years ago, 3 years ago. (Only the first run influences device rankings)

Motherboard	Asus TUF Z390M-PRO GAMING (all builds)
Memory	12.5 GB free of 16 GB @ 2.9 GHz
Display	3840 x 2160 - 32 Bit kleuren
OS	Windows 10
BIOS Date	20200415
Uptime	0 Days
Run Date	Sep 21 '20 at 08:20
Run Duration	125 Seconds
Run User	NLD-User
Background CPU	6%

Watch Gameplay How to compare your gameplay

PC Performing above expectations (82^nd percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor	Bench	Normal	Heavy	Server
Intel Core i5-9600K-$137 321,194 User benchmarks, average bench 93% LGA1151, 1 CPU, 6 cores, 6 threads Base clock 3.7 GHz, turbo 4.2 GHz (avg) Performing way above expectations (94^th percentile)	101% Outstanding	Memory 93.7 1-Core 148 2-Core 294 98% 179 Pts	4-Core 585 8-Core 849 90% 717 Pts	64-Core 857 53% 857 Pts
Poor: 82% ↑ This bench: 101% Great: 103%

Graphics Card	Bench	3D DX9	3D DX10	3D DX11
Nvidia RTX 2060-$273 645,160 User benchmarks, average bench 90% Asus(1043 873F) ≥ 4GB CLim: 2295 MHz, MLim: 3931 MHz, Ram: 6GB, Driver: 452.06 Performing below potential (63^rd percentile) - GPU OC Guide	91.4% Outstanding	Lighting 112 Reflection 120 Parallax 90.1 91% 107 fps	MRender 153 Gravity 105 Splatting 90 92% 116 fps
Poor: 80% ↑ This bench: 91.4% Great: 97%

Drives	Bench	Sequential	Random 4k	Deep queue 4k
Nvme ADATA SX8100NP 512GB 275 User benchmarks, average bench 228% 7GB free (System drive) Firmware: VB411D43 Max speed: PCIe 16,000 MB/s Relative performance n/a - sequential test incomplete		Read 468 Write 367 Mixed 122 70% 319 MB/s	4K Read 26.6 4K Write 154 4K Mixed 6.4 130% 62.4 MB/s	DQ Read 594 DQ Write 314 DQ Mixed 276 253% 395 MB/s
Poor: 115% Great: 306%
Seagate Expansion+ 4TB 2,051 User benchmarks, average bench 48% 3TB free Firmware: 9300 SusWrite @10s intervals: 133 137 137 137 129 136 MB/s Performing way above expectations (92^nd percentile)	65.9% Good	Read 94.1 Write 124 Mixed 71.8 SusWrite 135 78% 106 MB/s	4K Read 0.8 4K Write 3.9 4K Mixed 0.7 183% 1.8 MB/s
Poor: 16% ↑ This bench: 65.9% Great: 68%

Memory Kit	Bench	Multi core	Single core	Latency
HyperX Fury 2666 C16 2x8GB-$75 134,977 User benchmarks, average bench 82% 2 of 4 slots used 16GB DIMM DDR4 clocked @ 2880 MHz Performing above expectations (81^st percentile)	89.2% Excellent	MC Read 34.8 MC Write 36.3 MC Mixed 24 91% 31.7 GB/s	SC Read 18.3 SC Write 37.4 SC Mixed 25.3 77% 27 GB/s	Latency 60.5 66% 60.5 ns
Poor: 65% ↑ This bench: 89.2% Great: 97%

Take a copy of your results

System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Custom PC Builder (Explore upgrades for this PC) Build your perfect PC: compare component prices, popularity, speed and value for money

CHOOSE AN UPGRADE:

CPU

GPU

SSD

HDD

RAM

MBD

Typical TUF Z390M-PRO GAMING Builds (Compare 512 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings

Gaming 114%

UFO

Desktop 100%

UFO

Workstation 105%

UFO

Motherboard: Asus TUF Z390M-PRO GAMING

CPU
Core i7-9700KIntel $262Bench 97%, 550,833 samples	121x
Core i5-9600KIntel $137Bench 93%, 321,194 samples	108x
Core i9-9900KIntel $409Bench 98%, 354,223 samples	98x

GPU
RTX 2070S (Super)Nvidia $210Bench 115%, 663,603 samples	40x
RTX 2060Nvidia $273Bench 90%, 645,160 samples	30x
RTX 3070Nvidia $500Bench 148%, 619,642 samples	29x

SSD
970 Evo NVMe PCIe M.2 500GBSamsung $84Bench 273%, 381,216 samples	22x
970 Evo Plus NVMe PCIe M.2 1TBSamsung $90Bench 310%, 455,997 samples	21x
970 Evo Plus NVMe PCIe M.2 500GBSamsung $69Bench 276%, 367,854 samples	17x

RAM
HyperX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GBKingstonBench 86%, 239,203 samples	20x
Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GBCorsair $40Bench 85%, 653,654 samples	13x
Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GBCorsair $48Bench 82%, 606,405 samples	13x

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER

Value: 106% - Outstanding

Total price: $556

CPU	GPU	SSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $174	Nvidia RTX 4060 $293	Crucial MX500 250GB $39
Intel Core i5-12400F $120	Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385	Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-13600K $260	Nvidia RTX 4070 $549	Samsung 870 Evo 250GB $44

HDD	RAM	USB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $37	Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $40	SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $28	Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $48	SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $62	G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351	SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16