Asrock G31M-VS2

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 6%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 55%
Gunboat
Workstation
Workstation 5%
Tree trunk
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing as expected (45th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 55 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
ProcessorWith a below average single core score, this CPU can handle email, web browsing and audio/video playback but it will struggle to handle modern 3D games or workstation tasks such as video editing. Finally, with a gaming score of 46%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is below average.
Graphics21.2% is a below average 3D score (RTX 2060S = 100%). This GPU can handle older games but it will struggle to render recent games at resolutions greater than 1080p. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Boot Drive37% is low SSD score. With a better SSD this system will boot faster, make applications more responsive and reduce IO wait times.
Memory4GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and although it's sufficient for most games, some will benefit from up to 8GB of RAM. 4GB is also enough for modest file and system caches which allow for a responsive system.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 7 is still a viable option, it's now 14 years and 10 months old. This system should be upgraded to Windows 10 which is generally faster and has an improved set of core utilities including better versions of explorer and task manager.
Run History
7 years ago, 7 years ago.
MotherboardAsrock G31M-VS2  (all builds)
Memory2.2 GB free of 4 GB @ 0 GHz
Display1366 x 768 - 32 Bit colori
OSWindows 7
BIOS Date20100223
Uptime0 Days
Run DateApr 05 '17 at 18:32
Run Duration327 Seconds
Run User ITA-User
Background CPU5%

 PC Performing as expected (45th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
Intel Pentium E5300-$59
CPUSocket, 1 CPU, 2 cores, 2 threads
Base clock 3.35 GHz
Performing way above expectations (99th percentile)
46% Average
Memory 76.7
1-Core 38.4
2-Core 38.1
39% 51.1 Pts
4-Core 92.2
8-Core 93.1
12% 92.6 Pts
64-Core 90.5
6% 90.5 Pts
Poor: 22%
This bench: 46%
Great: 43%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
Nvidia GTX 750-Ti-$92
CLim: 1504 MHz, MLim: 1362 MHz, Ram: 2GB, Driver: 378.92
Performing way above expectations (100th percentile)
21.2% Poor
Lighting 26.7
Reflection 19.9
Parallax 23.7
22% 23.4 fps
MRender 28.7
Gravity 27.6
Splatting 19.9
20% 25.4 fps
Poor: 16%
This bench: 21.2%
Great: 19%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Kingston SSDNow UV400 120GB-$35
57GB free (System drive)
Firmware: 0C3FD6SD Max speed: SATA 3.0 600 MB/s
Performing below potential (2nd percentile) - Ensure that this drive is connected to a SATA 3.0 port with a SATA 3.0 cable
37% Below average
Read 210
Write 120
Mixed 74.3
30% 135 MB/s
4K Read 24.5
4K Write 38.8
4K Mixed 8.82
69% 24 MB/s
DQ Read 29.1
DQ Write 43.4
DQ Mixed 8.93
14% 27.1 MB/s
Poor: 44%
This bench: 37%
Great: 82%
Kingston SSDNow KC300 60GB-$56
13GB free
Firmware: 507ABBF0 Max speed: SATA 3.0 600 MB/s
Performing below potential (2nd percentile) - Ensure that this drive is connected to a SATA 3.0 port with a SATA 3.0 cable
43.4% Average
Read 202
Write 110
Mixed 113
31% 141 MB/s
4K Read 21.5
4K Write 71.4
4K Mixed 13.9
88% 35.6 MB/s
DQ Read 34.8
DQ Write 98.4
DQ Mixed 14.8
26% 49.4 MB/s
Poor: 51%
This bench: 43.4%
Great: 79%
WDC WD32 00BEVT-22ZCT0 320GB
279GB free, PID 0621
Operating at USB 2.1 Speed
Performing way below expectations (7th percentile)
5.55% Terrible
Read 18.2
Write 7.21
Mixed 2.85
9% 9.42 MB/s
4K Read 0.43
4K Write 0.4
4K Mixed 0.1
19% 0.31 MB/s
Poor: 6%
This bench: 5.55%
Great: 27%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Unknown 2x2GB
2 of 2 slots used
4GB DIMM SDRAM
Performing above expectations (61st percentile)
18.7% Very poor
MC Read 6.9
MC Write 5.1
MC Mixed 5.1
16% 5.7 GB/s
SC Read 4.5
SC Write 4.8
SC Mixed 5.9
14% 5.07 GB/s
Latency 86.9
46% 86.9 ns
Poor: 10%
This bench: 18.7%
Great: 44%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Typical G31M-VS2 Builds (Compare 47 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 2%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 37%
Jet ski
Workstation
Workstation 2%
Tree trunk

Motherboard: Asrock G31M-VS2

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 44% - Average Total price: $87
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate thousands of reddit accounts. Our benchmarks expose their spiel so they attack our reputation.
Why don’t PC brands endorse UserBenchmark?
Brands make boatloads on flagships like the 4090 and 14900KS. We help users get similar real-world performance for less money.
Why don’t youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't pay youtubers, so they don't praise us. Moreover, our data obstructs youtubers who promote overpriced or inferior products.
Why does UserBenchmark have negative trustpilot reviews?
The 200+ trustpilot reviews are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users don't give a monkey's about big brands.
Why is UserBenchmark popular with users?
Instead of pursuing brands for sponsorship, we've spent 13 years publishing real-world data for users.
The Best
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $164Nvidia RTX 4060 $293WD Black SN850X M.2 2TB $149
Intel Core i5-12400F $110Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385WD Black SN850X M.2 1TB $89
Intel Core i5-13600K $249Nvidia RTX 4070 $549Crucial T700 M.2 4TB $369
Today's hottest deals
If you buy something via a price link, UserBenchmark may earn a commission
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback