Acer Aspire M3970

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 45%
Yacht
Desktop
Desktop 78%
Battleship
Workstation
Workstation 37%
Jet ski
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing as expected (58th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 42 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
ProcessorWith a good single core score, this CPU can easily handle the majority of general computing tasks. Additionally this processor can handle very light workstation, and even some very light server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 73.7%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is good.
Graphics58.7% is a reasonable 3D score (RTX 2060S = 100%). This GPU can handle the majority of recent games but it will struggle with resolutions greater than 1080p at ultra detail levels. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Boot Drive27.1% is low SSD score. With a better SSD this system will boot faster, make applications more responsive and reduce IO wait times.
Memory16GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's more than sufficient for nearly all games. 16GB also allows for very large file and system caches, software development and batch photo editing/processing.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.
Sub-optimal background CPU (12%). High background CPU reduces benchmark accuracy. How to reduce background CPU.
SystemAcer Aspire M3970  (all builds)
MotherboardAcer Aspire M3970
Memory11.9 GB free of 16 GB @ 1.3 GHz
Display1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit colors
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20110712
Uptime2.4 Days
Run DateDec 08 '18 at 06:09
Run Duration154 Seconds
Run User CAN-User
Background CPU 12%
Watch Gameplay: 1060-6GB + 9600K How to compare your gameplay

 PC Performing as expected (58th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
Intel Core i7-2600-$189
CPU 1, 1 CPU, 4 cores, 8 threads
Base clock 3.4 GHz, turbo 3.5 GHz (avg)
Performing way above expectations (95th percentile)
73.7% Very good
Memory 91.4
1-Core 93.6
2-Core 181
72% 122 Pts
4-Core 303
8-Core 459
47% 381 Pts
64-Core 461
28% 461 Pts
Poor: 54%
This bench: 73.7%
Great: 74%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
Nvidia GTX 1060-6GB-$117
CLim: 1961 MHz, MLim: 2002 MHz, Ram: 6GB, Driver: 417.22
Performing way above expectations (91st percentile)
58.7% Above average
Lighting 73.1
Reflection 76.5
Parallax 65.7
60% 71.7 fps
MRender 71.9
Gravity 68.8
Splatting 69.2
57% 70 fps
Poor: 51%
This bench: 58.7%
Great: 60%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Kingston A400 120GB-$28
15GB free (System drive)
Firmware: SBFK71E0
SusWrite @10s intervals: 73 48 86 7.6 33 56 MB/s
Performing below potential (2nd percentile) - Ensure that this drive is connected to a SATA 3.0 port with a SATA 3.0 cable
27.1% Poor
Read 178
Write 103
Mixed 84.8
SusWrite 50.7
23% 104 MB/s
4K Read 14.8
4K Write 24.8
4K Mixed 12.2
51% 17.3 MB/s
DQ Read 27.8
DQ Write 33.1
DQ Mixed 29.8
23% 30.2 MB/s
Poor: 33%
This bench: 27.1%
Great: 85%
WD WD25 00JS-58NCB1 250GB
24GB free
Firmware: 10.02E01
SusWrite @10s intervals: 57 57 56 56 56 57 MB/s
Performing as expected (52nd percentile)
27.6% Poor
Read 39
Write 40.5
Mixed 33.5
SusWrite 56.5
31% 42.4 MB/s
4K Read 0.6
4K Write 1.9
4K Mixed 1
171% 1.17 MB/s
Poor: 11%
This bench: 27.6%
Great: 35%
Seagate Backup+ BK 1TB
110GB free
Firmware: 0412
SusWrite @10s intervals: 64 69 70 68 68 71 MB/s
Performing as expected (47th percentile)
35.6% Below average
Read 55.5
Write 43.5
Mixed 45.3
SusWrite 68.3
39% 53.2 MB/s
4K Read 0.5
4K Write 1.5
4K Mixed 0.7
126% 0.9 MB/s
Poor: 14%
This bench: 35.6%
Great: 58%
WDC WD32 00BEVT-22ZCT0 320GB
287GB free, PID 0621
Operating at USB 3.0 Speed
SusWrite @10s intervals: 55 55 54 55 54 56 MB/s
Performing way above expectations (95th percentile)
27.1% Poor
Read 59.5
Write 60.2
Mixed 41.5
SusWrite 54.8
73% 54 MB/s
4K Read 0.5
4K Write 2.1
4K Mixed 0.8
100% 1.13 MB/s
Poor: 6%
This bench: 27.1%
Great: 27%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
G.SKILL TridentX DDR3 2400 C10 2x8GB
2 of 4 slots used
16GB DIMM DDR3 1333 MHz
Performing below potential (22nd percentile) - ensure that a dual+ channel XMP BIOS profile is enabled: How to enable XMP
49.5% Average
MC Read 17.4
MC Write 17.4
MC Mixed 15.5
48% 16.8 GB/s
SC Read 13.6
SC Write 16.3
SC Mixed 14.8
43% 14.9 GB/s
Latency 65.2
61% 65.2 ns
Poor: 40%
This bench: 49.5%
Great: 88%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Typical Aspire M3970 Builds (Compare 451 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 6%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 61%
Destroyer
Workstation
Workstation 6%
Tree trunk

System: Acer Aspire M3970

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 68% - Good Total price: $227
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate thousands of reddit accounts. Our benchmarks expose their spiel so they attack our reputation.
Why don’t PC brands endorse UserBenchmark?
Brands make boatloads on flagships like the 4090 and 14900KS. We help users get similar real-world performance for less money.
Why don’t youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't pay youtubers, so they don't praise us. Moreover, our data obstructs youtubers who promote overpriced or inferior products.
Why does UserBenchmark have negative trustpilot reviews?
The 200+ trustpilot reviews are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users don't give a monkey's about big brands.
Why is UserBenchmark popular with users?
Instead of pursuing brands for sponsorship, we've spent 13 years publishing real-world data for users.
The Best
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $164Nvidia RTX 4060 $293WD Black SN850X M.2 2TB $150
Intel Core i5-12400F $110Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385WD Black SN850X M.2 1TB $89
Intel Core i5-13600K $249Nvidia RTX 4070 $549Crucial T700 M.2 4TB $369
Today's hottest deals
If you buy something via a price link, UserBenchmark may earn a commission
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback