HP h8-1417c

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 19%
Surfboard
Desktop
Desktop 79%
Battleship
Workstation
Workstation 16%
Surfboard
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing above expectations (81st percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 19 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
ProcessorWith a good single core score, this CPU can easily handle the majority of general computing tasks. Additionally this processor can handle light workstation, and even some light server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 77.6%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is good.
Graphics17.6% is a below average 3D score (RTX 2060S = 100%). This GPU can handle older games but it will struggle to render recent games at resolutions greater than 1080p. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Boot Drive69.1% is a good SSD score. This drive enables fast boots, responsive applications and ensures minimum system IO wait times.
Memory12GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's more than sufficient for nearly all games. 12GB also allows for very large file and system caches, software development and batch photo editing/processing.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.
Sub-optimal background CPU (19%). High background CPU reduces benchmark accuracy. How to reduce background CPU.
SystemHP h8-1417c  (all builds)
MotherboardPEGATRON 2AD5
Memory9.7 GB free of 12 GB @ 1.6 GHz
Display1920 x 1200 - 32 Bit colors
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20120925
Uptime0 Days
Run DateSep 12 '20 at 17:47
Run Duration126 Seconds
Run User USA-User
Background CPU 19%

 PC Performing above expectations (81st percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
Intel Core i7-3770-$297
SOCKET 0, 1 CPU, 4 cores, 8 threads
Base clock 3.4 GHz, turbo 3.7 GHz (avg)
Performing way above expectations (98th percentile)
77.6% Very good
Memory 84
1-Core 103
2-Core 214
76% 133 Pts
4-Core 391
8-Core 521
58% 456 Pts
64-Core 520
32% 520 Pts
Poor: 57%
This bench: 77.6%
Great: 76%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
Nvidia GTX 750-Ti-$92
CLim: 1333 MHz, MLim: 1350 MHz, Ram: 2GB, Driver: 432.00
Performing above expectations (85th percentile)
17.6% Very poor
Lighting 21.8
Reflection 17.6
Parallax 20.4
18% 19.9 fps
MRender 25.5
Gravity 22.8
Splatting 17.3
17% 21.9 fps
Poor: 16%
This bench: 17.6%
Great: 19%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Adata SU635 240GB-$20
45GB free (System drive)
Firmware: V8X01c89
SusWrite @10s intervals: 226 353 359 364 360 186 MB/s
Performing as expected (48th percentile)
69.1% Good
Read 400
Write 345
Mixed 326
SusWrite 308
77% 345 MB/s
4K Read 17.8
4K Write 46.9
4K Mixed 25
84% 29.9 MB/s
DQ Read 148
DQ Write 221
DQ Mixed 188
141% 186 MB/s
Poor: 32%
This bench: 69.1%
Great: 97%
Seagate Barracuda 7200.14 2TB-$37
2TB free
Firmware: HP16
SusWrite @10s intervals: 146 175 172 172 176 184 MB/s
Performing above expectations (77th percentile)
104% Outstanding
Read 192
Write 156
Mixed 82.2
SusWrite 171
110% 150 MB/s
4K Read 1.1
4K Write 1.2
4K Mixed 0.9
168% 1.07 MB/s
Poor: 51%
This bench: 104%
Great: 114%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Samsung M378B5273CH0-CK0 M378B1G73BH0-CK0 12GB
1600, 1600 MHz
4096, 8192 MB
Performing way above expectations (96th percentile)
57.1% Above average
MC Read 21.9
MC Write 19.8
MC Mixed 17.7
57% 19.8 GB/s
SC Read 16.6
SC Write 17.1
SC Mixed 19.2
50% 17.6 GB/s
Latency 73.5
54% 73.5 ns
Poor: 28%
This bench: 57.1%
Great: 57%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Typical h8-1417c Builds (Compare 29 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 7%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 64%
Destroyer
Workstation
Workstation 7%
Tree trunk

System: HP h8-1417c

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 68% - Good Total price: $297
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate thousands of reddit accounts. Our benchmarks expose their spiel so they attack our reputation.
Why don’t PC brands endorse UserBenchmark?
Brands make boatloads on flagships like the 4090 and 14900KS. We help users get similar real-world performance for less money.
Why don’t youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't pay youtubers, so they don't praise us. Moreover, our data obstructs youtubers who promote overpriced or inferior products.
Why does UserBenchmark have negative trustpilot reviews?
The 200+ trustpilot reviews are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users don't give a monkey's about big brands.
Why is UserBenchmark popular with users?
Instead of pursuing brands for sponsorship, we've spent 13 years publishing real-world data for users.
The Best
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $169Nvidia RTX 4060 $293WD Black SN850X M.2 2TB $135
Intel Core i5-12400F $110Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385WD Black SN850X M.2 1TB $75
Intel Core i5-13600K $249Nvidia RTX 4070 $549Crucial T700 M.2 4TB $369
Today's hottest deals
If you buy something via a price link, UserBenchmark may earn a commission
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback