TEST
YOUR PC
ADD TO PC
BUILD

Gigabyte GA-P61A-D3

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 19%
Surfboard
Desktop
Desktop 80%
Battleship
Workstation
Workstation 16%
Surfboard
Save results Copy results User guide
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing as expected (59th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 41 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
ProcessorWith a brilliant single core score, this CPU is the business: It demolishes everyday tasks such as web browsing, office apps and audio/video playback. Additionally this processor can handle light workstation, and even some light server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 77.2%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is good.
Graphics18.3% is a below average 3D score (RTX 2060S = 100%). This GPU can handle older games but it will struggle to render recent games at resolutions greater than 1080p. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Boot Drive45% is a reasonable SSD score. This drive enables fast boots and responsive applications.
Memory8GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's sufficient for the vast majority of games. 8GB is also enough for moderate file and system caches which result in a very responsive system.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.
Run History
MotherboardGigabyte GA-P61A-D3  (all builds)
Memory5 GB free of 8 GB @ 1.3 GHz
Display1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit colors
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20130417
Uptime11 Days
Run DateSep 10 '20 at 15:38
Run Duration149 Seconds
Run User IRN-User
Background CPU7%

 PC Performing as expected (59th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
Intel Core i7-3770-$297
Intel(R) Core(TM) i7-3770 CPU @ 3.40GHz, 1 CPU, 4 cores, 8 threads
Base clock 3.9 GHz, turbo 4.25 GHz (avg)
Performing way above expectations (97th percentile)
77.2% Very good
Memory 92.5
1-Core 105
2-Core 177
75% 125 Pts
4-Core 335
8-Core 504
52% 420 Pts
64-Core 504
31% 504 Pts
Poor: 57% ↑
This bench: 77.2%
 Great: 76%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
Nvidia GTX 750-Ti-$92
MSI(1462 3102)
CLim: 1359 MHz, MLim: 1350 MHz, Ram: 2GB, Driver: 446.14
Performing above expectations (85th percentile)
18.3% Very poor
Lighting 22.7
Reflection 17.8
Parallax 20.8
18% 20.5 fps
MRender 26
Gravity 23.1
Splatting 17.7
18% 22.3 fps
Poor: 16% ↑
This bench: 18.3%
 Great: 19%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Biostar S100-120GB 120GB
76GB free (System drive)
Firmware: R0724S
SusWrite @10s intervals: 131 188 202 203 204 202 MB/s
Performing below potential (16th percentile) - Ensure that this drive is connected to a SATA 3.0 port with a SATA 3.0 cable
45% Average
Read 222
Write 194
Mixed 181
SusWrite 188
44% 196 MB/s
4K Read 25.1
4K Write 40.1
4K Mixed 13.5
77% 26.2 MB/s
DQ Read 32.3
DQ Write 69.3
DQ Mixed 17.8
23% 39.8 MB/s
Poor: 39% ↑
This bench: 45%
 Great: 88%
WD Blue 500GB (2010)-$25
139GB free
Firmware: 15.01H15
SusWrite @10s intervals: 75 84 81 83 81 83 MB/s
Performing below expectations (21st percentile)
41.9% Average
Read 64.8
Write 59.7
Mixed 46.6
SusWrite 81.1
46% 63.1 MB/s
4K Read 0.5
4K Write 1.3
4K Mixed 0.5
100% 0.77 MB/s
Poor: 24% ↑
This bench: 41.9%
 Great: 69%
UFD 3.0 Silicon-Power64G 64GB
11GB free, PID 0917
Operating at USB 2.1 Speed
SusWrite @10s intervals: 24 25 25 26 26 26 MB/s
Performing as expected (51st percentile)
11.7% Very poor
Read 32.2
Write 25.9
Mixed 28
SusWrite 25.2
37% 27.8 MB/s
4K Read 4.1
4K Write 0.2
4K Mixed 0
22% 1.43 MB/s
Poor: 7% ↑
This bench: 11.7%
 Great: 27%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Unknown-002.AOOLF 2x4GB
2 of 2 slots used
8GB DIMM DDR3 clocked @ 1333 MHz
Performing way above expectations (86th percentile)
51.6% Above average
MC Read 18.5
MC Write 17.7
MC Mixed 16
50% 17.4 GB/s
SC Read 14.6
SC Write 17.7
SC Mixed 15.8
46% 16 GB/s
Latency 63.1
63% 63.1 ns
Poor: 23% ↑
This bench: 51.6%
 Great: 52%
Take a copy of your results How to check your in-game FPS

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Custom PC Builder (Explore upgrades for this PC) Build your perfect PC: compare component prices, popularity, speed and value for money

CHOOSE AN UPGRADE:

CPU GPU SSD HDD RAM MBD
Typical GA-P61A-D3 Builds (Compare 416 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 4%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 60%
Gunboat
Workstation
Workstation 4%
Tree trunk

Motherboard: Gigabyte GA-P61A-D3

CPU
Core i5-3570IntelBench 65%, 104,858 samples69x
Core i5-3470Intel  $59Bench 63%, 223,595 samples57x
Core i7-3770Intel  $297Bench 69%, 278,207 samples48x
GPU
GeForce GT 610NvidiaBench 2%, 62,458 samples32x
GeForce GT 630NvidiaBench 4%, 60,212 samples29x
GTX 960Nvidia  $198Bench 33%, 440,282 samples26x
SSD
WDS2 40G2G0A-00JH30 240GBWDCBench 44%, 768 samples21x
SSD 120GBGigabyte  $30Bench 70%, 13,685 samples10x
A400 480GBKingston  $38Bench 74%, 237,487 samples8x
RAM
KVR16N11/8 1x8GBKingstonBench 29%, 181 samples13x
KVR16N11/8 2x8GBKingstonBench 52%, 276 samples10x
2x4GBUnknownBench 39%, 424,126 samples8x
EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate countless reddit accounts. UserBenchmark’s data exposes their marketing spiel so they systematically attack our reputation.
Why don’t large PC brands support UserBenchmark?
PC brands profit greatly from flagship hardware like the 4090, 14900KS, and 7950X3D. We help users get similar real-world performance for less money.
Why don’t any youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't sponsor youtubers, so they have no incentive to praise us. Moreover, brands pay youtubers extra to promote inferior products but UserBenchmark’s data exposes them.
Why does UserBenchmark have so many negative trustpilot reviews?
Trustpilot hosts user-generated online reviews. It's obvious that the 200+ UserBenchmark reviews, are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users aren't interested in promoting billon-dollar brands.
Why is UserBenchmark so popular with users?
Instead of pursuing lucrative sponsorships with billion-dollar PC brands, we have dedicated 13 years to publishing accurate real-world data. As a result, our users save millions every year and they keep returning.
The Best.
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $170Nvidia RTX 4060 $293Crucial MX500 250GB $39
Intel Core i5-12400F $122Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-13600K $260Nvidia RTX 4070 $550Samsung 870 Evo 250GB $45
HDDRAMUSB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $37Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $40SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $28Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $48SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $62G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16
If you make a purchase via one of these links, our site may earn a commission
Today's hottest
Amazon Ebay
deals
Build Test EFps
Can You Run It?
►
YouTube
*NEW*
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback