ADD TO PC
BUILD

Gigabyte GA-F2A75M-D3H

Performance Results


Gaming 7% Tree trunk	Desktop 42% Speed boat	Workstation 6% Tree trunk


PC Status	Overall this PC is performing as expected (50th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 50 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
Processor	With a relatively low single core score, this CPU can handle email, light web browsing and basic audio/video playback, but it will struggle to handle CPU intensive tasks. Finally, with a gaming score of 37%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is poor.
Graphics	9.42% is a very low 3D score (RTX 2060S = 100%). This GPU can only handle very basic 3D games but it's fine for general computing tasks.
Boot Drive	87.6% is a very good SSD score. This drive is suitable for moderate workstation use, it will facilitate fast boots, responsive applications and ensure minimum IO wait times.
Memory	8GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's sufficient for the vast majority of games. 8GB is also enough for moderate file and system caches which result in a very responsive system.
OS Version	Although Windows 7 is still a viable option, it's now 14 years and 10 months old. This system should be upgraded to Windows 10 which is generally faster and has an improved set of core utilities including better versions of explorer and task manager.

Run History

7 years ago, 7 years ago, 7 years ago, 7 years ago.

Motherboard	Gigabyte GA-F2A75M-D3H (all builds)
Memory	4.3 GB free of 8 GB @ 1.3 GHz
Display	1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit colors,
OS	Windows 7
BIOS Date	20131215
Uptime	0.1 Days
Run Date	Mar 31 '17 at 18:23
Run Duration	254 Seconds
Run User	HKG-User
Background CPU	0%

PC Performing as expected (50^th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor	Bench	Normal	Heavy	Server
AMD A8-5600K APU-$250 14,744 User benchmarks, average bench 49% P0, 1 CPU, 2 cores, 4 threads Base clock 3.6 GHz Performing way below expectations (7^th percentile)	37% Below average	Memory 49.2 1-Core 43.8 2-Core 88.5 36% 60.5 Pts	4-Core 146 8-Core 135 19% 141 Pts	64-Core 161 10% 161 Pts
Poor: 34% ↑ This bench: 37% Great: 59%

Graphics Card	Bench	3D DX9	3D DX10	3D DX11
Nvidia GTX 650-$112 69,673 User benchmarks, average bench 8% Gigabyte(1458 3553) 1GB CLim: 1110 MHz, MLim: 1250 MHz, Ram: 1GB, Driver: 376.53 Performing way above expectations (92^nd percentile)	9.42% Terrible	Lighting 10.6 Reflection 9.42 Parallax 11.6 9% 10.5 fps	MRender 14.4 Gravity 12.3 Splatting 13.4 11% 13.4 fps
Poor: 8% ↑ This bench: 9.42% Great: 9%

Drives	Bench	Sequential	Random 4k	Deep queue 4k
SanDisk Extreme Pro 240GB-$79 10,862 User benchmarks, average bench 92% 101GB free (System drive) Firmware: X212 Max speed: SATA 3.0 600 MB/s Performing as expected (41^st percentile) (ID) Attribute Now Worst Value (05) Reallocated sector count 100 100 0 (09) Power-on hours count 253 100 1397 (0C) Power cycle count 100 100 1475 (A6) Unknown 100 100 1 (A7) Unknown 100 100 20 (A8) Unknown 100 100 101 (A9) Unknown 100 100 395 (AB) Unknown 100 100 0 (AC) Unknown 100 100 0 (AD) Unknown 100 100 28 (AE) Unknown 100 100 735 (B8) Unknown 100 100 0 (BB) vendor-specific 100 100 0 (BC) Unknown 100 100 2 (C2) HDA temperature 69 48 206159544351 (C7) UDMA CRC error rate 100 100 0 (D4) Unknown 100 100 5 (E6) GMR head amplitude 100 100 93 (E8) Unknown 100 100 100 (E9) Unknown 100 100 7620 (F1) Unknown 253 253 5055 (F2) Unknown 253 253 7517 (F4) Unknown 0 100 0	87.6% Excellent	Read 509 Write 441 Mixed 437 103% 462 MB/s	4K Read 29.2 4K Write 66.3 4K Mixed 23.4 109% 39.7 MB/s	DQ Read 206 DQ Write 139 DQ Mixed 62.9 77% 136 MB/s
Poor: 65% ↑ This bench: 87.6% Great: 114%
WD Black 1.5TB (2010) 6,983 User benchmarks, average bench 65% 506GB free Firmware: 05.0 Max speed: SATA 3.0 600 MB/s Performing way above expectations (100^th percentile) (ID) Attribute Now Worst Value (01) Raw read error rate 200 200 0 (03) Spinup time 253 253 8850 (04) Start/Stop count 96 96 4767 (05) Reallocated sector count 200 200 0 (07) Seek error rate 200 200 0 (09) Power-on hours count 80 80 14829 (0A) Spinup retry count 100 100 0 (0B) Calibration retry count 100 100 0 (0C) Power cycle count 98 98 2556 (C0) Power-off retract count 200 200 674 (C1) Load/Unload cycle count 199 199 4092 (C2) HDA temperature 109 94 43 (C4) Reallocation count 200 200 0 (C5) Current pending sector count 200 200 0 (C6) Offline scan uncorrectable count 200 200 0 (C7) UDMA CRC error rate 200 200 0 (C8) Write error rate 200 200 1	90.9% Outstanding	Read 200 Write 117 Mixed 120 109% 146 MB/s	4K Read 0.5 4K Write 2.44 4K Mixed 0.44 115% 1.13 MB/s
Poor: 44% ↑ This bench: 90.9% Great: 85%
TOSHIBA Q300 Pro 256GB 42 User benchmarks, average bench 40% 238GB free, PID 2329 Operating at USB 2.0 Speed Performing above expectations (80^th percentile)	59.3% Above average	Read 37.6 Write 37.5 Mixed 37.3 48% 37.5 MB/s	4K Read 10.2 4K Write 14.1 4K Mixed 7.62 776% 10.6 MB/s	DQ Read 11.9 DQ Write 18.6 DQ Mixed 8.76 976% 13.1 MB/s
Poor: 22% ↑ This bench: 59.3% Great: 77%
BUFFALO External HDD 256GB 8 User benchmarks, average bench 170% 198GB free, PID 01f0 Operating at USB 3.0 Speed Performing way below expectations (13^th percentile)	144% Outstanding	Read 170 Write 147 Mixed 94.8 167% 137 MB/s	4K Read 8.37 4K Write 27.8 4K Mixed 6.57 1,200% 14.2 MB/s	DQ Read 9.54 DQ Write 46.7 DQ Mixed 7.31 1,873% 21.2 MB/s
Poor: 144% ↑ This bench: 144% Great: 180%

Memory Kit	Bench	Multi core	Single core	Latency
Adata DDR3 1866G 2O 2x4GB 411 User benchmarks, average bench 35% 2 of 4 slots used 8GB DIMM DDR3 1333 MHz clocked @ 1866 MHz Performing way below expectations (17^th percentile)	30.5% Below average	MC Read 15.3 MC Write 6.6 MC Mixed 12.2 32% 11.4 GB/s	SC Read 5.3 SC Write 5.6 SC Mixed 8.4 18% 6.43 GB/s	Latency 164 24% 164 ns
Poor: 29% ↑ This bench: 30.5% Great: 39%

Take a copy of your results How to check your in-game FPS

System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Custom PC Builder (Explore upgrades for this PC) Build your perfect PC: compare component prices, popularity, speed and value for money

CHOOSE AN UPGRADE:

CPU

GPU

SSD

HDD

RAM

Typical GA-F2A75M-D3H Builds (Compare 78 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings

Gaming

Gaming 7%

Tree trunk

Desktop

Desktop 51%

Yacht

Workstation

Workstation 6%

Tree trunk

Motherboard: Gigabyte GA-F2A75M-D3H

CPU
Athlon II X4 740KAMDBench 49%, 4,318 samples	23x
A4-5300 APUAMD $36Bench 40%, 7,032 samples	9x
A10-5800K APU (2012 D.Tr)AMD $119Bench 50%, 18,312 samples	9x

GPU
HD 7750AMDBench 8%, 22,655 samples	12x
GTX 650Nvidia $112Bench 8%, 69,673 samples	9x
Radeon HD 7660DAMDBench 5%, 7,665 samples	6x

SSD
0 500GBCt500mx5Bench 92%, 2,476 samples	4x
MX500 1TBCrucial $84Bench 106%, 202,785 samples	4x
M550 mSATA 512GBCrucial $458Bench 87%, 441 samples	4x

RAM
99P5471-002.A 4x2GBKingstonBench 29%, 47 samples	4x
SHARETRONIC 1x4GBUnknownBench 27%, 954 samples	4x
DDR3 1600G 4x2GBAdataBench 43%, 200 samples	4x

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER

Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?

Marketers operate thousands of reddit accounts. Our benchmarks expose their spiel so they attack our reputation.

Why don’t PC brands endorse UserBenchmark?

Brands make boatloads on flagships like the 4090 and 14900KS. We help users get similar real-world performance for less money.

Why don’t youtubers promote UserBenchmark?

We don't pay youtubers, so they don't praise us. Moreover, our data obstructs youtubers who promote overpriced or inferior products.

Why does UserBenchmark have negative trustpilot reviews?

The 200+ trustpilot reviews are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users don't give a monkey's about big brands.

Why is UserBenchmark popular with users?

Instead of pursuing brands for sponsorship, we've spent 13 years publishing real-world data for users.

The Best

CPU	GPU	SSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $169	Nvidia RTX 4060 $293	WD Black SN850X M.2 2TB $135
Intel Core i5-12400F $110	Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385	WD Black SN850X M.2 1TB $89
Intel Core i5-13600K $249	Nvidia RTX 4070 $549	Crucial T700 M.2 4TB $369

Today's hottest

Amazon Ebay

deals

CPU GPU SSD HDD USB RAM MBD

If you buy something via a price link, UserBenchmark may earn a commission

Build

Test

EFps

Can You Run It?

►
YouTube
*NEW*

About • User Guide • FAQs • Email • Privacy • Developer • YouTube Feedback