Gigabyte GA-F2A75M-D3H

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 9%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 58%
Gunboat
Workstation
Workstation 7%
Tree trunk
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing above expectations (67th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 33 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
ProcessorWith a good single core score, this CPU can easily handle the majority of general computing tasks. Despite its good single core score this processor isn't appropriate for workstation use due to its relatively weak multi-core performance. Finally, with a gaming score of 56.6%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is average.
Graphics9.37% is a very low 3D score (RTX 2060S = 100%). This GPU can only handle very basic 3D games but it's fine for general computing tasks.
Boot Drive88% is a very good SSD score. This drive is suitable for moderate workstation use, it will facilitate fast boots, responsive applications and ensure minimum IO wait times.
Memory8GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's sufficient for the vast majority of games. 8GB is also enough for moderate file and system caches which result in a very responsive system.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 7 is still a viable option, it's now 14 years and 10 months old. This system should be upgraded to Windows 10 which is generally faster and has an improved set of core utilities including better versions of explorer and task manager.
Run History
MotherboardGigabyte GA-F2A75M-D3H  (all builds)
Memory1.7 GB free of 8 GB @ 1.3 GHz
Display1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit colors,
OSWindows 7
BIOS Date20131215
Uptime0.4 Days
Run DateApr 08 '17 at 09:47
Run Duration150 Seconds
Run User HKG-User
Background CPU0%

 PC Performing above expectations (67th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
AMD A8-5600K APU-$250
P0, 1 CPU, 2 cores, 4 threads
Base clock 3.6 GHz
Performing way above expectations (89th percentile)
56.6% Above average
Memory 81.6
1-Core 58
2-Core 105
52% 81.5 Pts
4-Core 185
8-Core 188
25% 187 Pts
64-Core 180
11% 180 Pts
Poor: 34%
This bench: 56.6%
Great: 59%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
Nvidia GTX 650-$112
Gigabyte(1458 3553) 1GB
CLim: 1110 MHz, MLim: 1250 MHz, Ram: 1GB, Driver: 376.53
Performing way above expectations (92nd percentile)
9.37% Terrible
Lighting 10.5
Reflection 9.31
Parallax 11.6
9% 10.5 fps
MRender 14
Gravity 12.3
Splatting 13.6
11% 13.3 fps
Poor: 8%
This bench: 9.37%
Great: 9%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
SanDisk Extreme Pro 240GB-$79
100GB free (System drive)
Firmware: X212 Max speed: SATA 3.0 600 MB/s
Performing as expected (41st percentile)
88% Excellent
Read 503
Write 447
Mixed 416
102% 455 MB/s
4K Read 28
4K Write 63.2
4K Mixed 25.5
108% 38.9 MB/s
DQ Read 206
DQ Write 145
DQ Mixed 63.8
78% 138 MB/s
Poor: 65%
This bench: 88%
Great: 114%
WD Black 1.5TB (2010)
506GB free
Firmware: 05.0 Max speed: SATA 3.0 600 MB/s
Performing way above expectations (87th percentile)
78.5% Very good
Read 171
Write 103
Mixed 128
101% 134 MB/s
4K Read 0.5
4K Write 2.39
4K Mixed 0.45
115% 1.11 MB/s
Poor: 44%
This bench: 78.5%
Great: 85%
BUFFALO External HDD 500GB
161GB free, PID 01f0
Operating at USB 3.0 Speed
Performing above expectations (60th percentile)
32% Below average
Read 72.3
Write 75.2
Mixed 45
80% 64.2 MB/s
4K Read 0.64
4K Write 1.62
4K Mixed 0.29
67% 0.85 MB/s
Poor: 30%
This bench: 32%
Great: 42%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Adata DDR3 1866G 2O 2x4GB
2 of 4 slots used
8GB DIMM DDR3 1333 MHz clocked @ 1866 MHz
Performing below potential (36th percentile) - ensure that a dual+ channel XMP BIOS profile is enabled: How to enable XMP
33.3% Below average
MC Read 14.3
MC Write 7
MC Mixed 12.7
32% 11.3 GB/s
SC Read 8.4
SC Write 6.4
SC Mixed 10
24% 8.27 GB/s
Latency 77.7
52% 77.7 ns
Poor: 29%
This bench: 33.3%
Great: 39%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Typical GA-F2A75M-D3H Builds (Compare 78 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 7%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 51%
Yacht
Workstation
Workstation 6%
Tree trunk

Motherboard: Gigabyte GA-F2A75M-D3H

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate thousands of reddit accounts. Our benchmarks expose their spiel so they attack our reputation.
Why don’t PC brands endorse UserBenchmark?
Brands make boatloads on flagships like the 4090 and 14900KS. We help users get similar real-world performance for less money.
Why don’t youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't pay youtubers, so they don't praise us. Moreover, our data obstructs youtubers who promote overpriced or inferior products.
Why does UserBenchmark have negative trustpilot reviews?
The 200+ trustpilot reviews are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users don't give a monkey's about big brands.
Why is UserBenchmark popular with users?
Instead of pursuing brands for sponsorship, we've spent 13 years publishing real-world data for users.
The Best
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $174Nvidia RTX 4060 $293WD Black SN850X M.2 2TB $135
Intel Core i5-12400F $110Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385WD Black SN850X M.2 1TB $89
Intel Core i5-13600K $249Nvidia RTX 4070 $549Crucial T700 M.2 4TB $369
Today's hottest deals
If you buy something via a price link, UserBenchmark may earn a commission
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback