Gigabyte GA-F2A75M-D3H

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 8%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 53%
Yacht
Workstation
Workstation 7%
Tree trunk
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing above expectations (62nd percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 38 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
ProcessorWith an average single core score, this CPU can handle browsing the web, email, video playback and the majority of general computing tasks including light gaming when coupled with an appropriate GPU. Finally, with a gaming score of 47.4%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is below average.
Graphics9.48% is a very low 3D score (RTX 2060S = 100%). This GPU can only handle very basic 3D games but it's fine for general computing tasks.
Boot Drive90.3% is a very good SSD score. This drive is suitable for moderate workstation use, it will facilitate fast boots, responsive applications and ensure minimum IO wait times.
Memory8GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's sufficient for the vast majority of games. 8GB is also enough for moderate file and system caches which result in a very responsive system.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 7 is still a viable option, it's now 14 years and 10 months old. This system should be upgraded to Windows 10 which is generally faster and has an improved set of core utilities including better versions of explorer and task manager.
Run History
MotherboardGigabyte GA-F2A75M-D3H  (all builds)
Memory5 GB free of 8 GB @ 1.3 GHz
Display1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit colors,
OSWindows 7
BIOS Date20131215
Uptime0 Days
Run DateApr 01 '17 at 05:32
Run Duration179 Seconds
Run User HKG-User
Background CPU0%

 PC Performing above expectations (62nd percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
AMD A8-5600K APU-$250
P0, 1 CPU, 2 cores, 4 threads
Base clock 3.6 GHz
Performing below expectations (38th percentile)
47.4% Average
Memory 66.3
1-Core 63.4
2-Core 122
50% 83.8 Pts
4-Core 160
8-Core 200
23% 180 Pts
64-Core 191
12% 191 Pts
Poor: 34%
This bench: 47.4%
Great: 59%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
Nvidia GTX 650-$112
Gigabyte(1458 3553) 1GB
CLim: 1110 MHz, MLim: 1250 MHz, Ram: 1GB, Driver: 376.53
Performing way above expectations (92nd percentile)
9.48% Terrible
Lighting 10.7
Reflection 9.69
Parallax 13.5
9% 11.3 fps
MRender 14
Gravity 12.5
Splatting 13.4
11% 13.3 fps
Poor: 8%
This bench: 9.48%
Great: 9%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
SanDisk Extreme Pro 240GB-$79
101GB free (System drive)
Firmware: X212 Max speed: SATA 3.0 600 MB/s
Performing as expected (47th percentile)
90.3% Outstanding
Read 508
Write 449
Mixed 438
104% 465 MB/s
4K Read 30
4K Write 70.4
4K Mixed 24.6
114% 41.7 MB/s
DQ Read 234
DQ Write 145
DQ Mixed 62.5
81% 147 MB/s
Poor: 65%
This bench: 90.3%
Great: 114%
WD Black 1.5TB (2010)
506GB free
Firmware: 05.0 Max speed: SATA 3.0 600 MB/s
Performing way above expectations (91st percentile)
81% Excellent
Read 170
Write 113
Mixed 127
102% 136 MB/s
4K Read 0.85
4K Write 2.39
4K Mixed 0.33
117% 1.19 MB/s
Poor: 44%
This bench: 81%
Great: 85%
BUFFALO External HDD 240GB
185GB free, PID 01f0
Operating at USB 3.0 Speed
Performing above expectations (71st percentile)
182% Outstanding
Read 171
Write 193
Mixed 166
231% 177 MB/s
4K Read 20.4
4K Write 35.7
4K Mixed 11
1,666% 22.4 MB/s
DQ Read 24
DQ Write 49
DQ Mixed 11.7
2,152% 28.2 MB/s
Poor: 157%
This bench: 182%
Great: 184%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Adata DDR3 1866G 2O 2x4GB
2 of 4 slots used
8GB DIMM DDR3 1333 MHz clocked @ 1866 MHz
Performing below potential (36th percentile) - ensure that a dual+ channel XMP BIOS profile is enabled: How to enable XMP
32.5% Below average
MC Read 15.4
MC Write 7
MC Mixed 11.7
32% 11.4 GB/s
SC Read 8.8
SC Write 7
SC Mixed 10.6
25% 8.8 GB/s
Latency 110
36% 110 ns
Poor: 29%
This bench: 32.5%
Great: 39%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Typical GA-F2A75M-D3H Builds (Compare 78 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 7%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 51%
Yacht
Workstation
Workstation 6%
Tree trunk

Motherboard: Gigabyte GA-F2A75M-D3H

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate thousands of reddit accounts. Our benchmarks expose their spiel so they attack our reputation.
Why don’t PC brands endorse UserBenchmark?
Brands make boatloads on flagships like the 4090 and 14900KS. We help users get similar real-world performance for less money.
Why don’t youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't pay youtubers, so they don't praise us. Moreover, our data obstructs youtubers who promote overpriced or inferior products.
Why does UserBenchmark have negative trustpilot reviews?
The 200+ trustpilot reviews are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users don't give a monkey's about big brands.
Why is UserBenchmark popular with users?
Instead of pursuing brands for sponsorship, we've spent 13 years publishing real-world data for users.
The Best
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $169Nvidia RTX 4060 $293WD Black SN850X M.2 2TB $135
Intel Core i5-12400F $110Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385WD Black SN850X M.2 1TB $75
Intel Core i5-13600K $249Nvidia RTX 4070 $549Crucial T700 M.2 4TB $369
Today's hottest deals
If you buy something via a price link, UserBenchmark may earn a commission
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback