Gigabyte Z390 AORUS MASTER

Performance Results


Gaming 18% Surfboard	Desktop 94% Nuclear submarine	Workstation 18% Surfboard


PC Status	Overall this PC is performing as expected (58th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 42 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
Processor	With an outstanding single core score, this CPU is the cat's whiskers: It demolishes everyday tasks such as web browsing, office apps and audio/video playback. Additionally this processor can handle intensive workstation, and even full-fledged server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 102%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is outstanding.
Graphics	7.24% is a very low 3D score (RTX 2060S = 100%). This GPU can only handle very basic 3D games but it's fine for general computing tasks.
Memory	32GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's far more than any current game requires. 32GB will also allow for large file and system caches, virtual machine hosting, software development, video editing and batch multimedia processing.
OS Version	Although Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.

System	Gigabyte Z390 AORUS MASTER
Motherboard	Gigabyte Z390 AORUS MASTER (all builds)
Memory	25.3 GB free of 32 GB @ 3.2 GHz
Display	3440 x 1440 - 32 Bit Farben
OS	Windows 10
BIOS Date	20191015
Uptime	1.2 Days
Run Date	Sep 02 '20 at 21:10
Run Duration	339 Seconds
Run User	DEU-User
Background CPU	0%

PC Performing as expected (58^th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor	Bench	Normal	Heavy	Server
Intel Core i9-9900K-$410 354,223 User benchmarks, average bench 98% U3E1, 1 CPU, 8 cores, 16 threads Base clock 3.6 GHz, turbo 4.95 GHz (avg) Performing way above expectations (92^nd percentile)	102% Outstanding	Memory 96 1-Core 159 2-Core 305 102% 186 Pts	4-Core 583 8-Core 1,084 100% 833 Pts	64-Core 1,659 103% 1,659 Pts
Poor: 89% ↑ This bench: 102% Great: 104%

Graphics Card	Bench	3D DX9	3D DX10	3D DX11
Intel UHD Graphics 630 65,338 User benchmarks, average bench 5% Gigabyte(1458 D000) 1GB Driver: igdumdim64.dll Ver. 26.20.100.7642 Performing way above expectations (98^th percentile)	7.24% Terrible	Lighting 6.73 Reflection 12.2 Parallax 8.88 6% 9.27 fps	MRender 13.4 Gravity 7.57 Splatting 16.7 11% 12.5 fps
Poor: 4% ↑ This bench: 7.24% Great: 7%

Drives	Bench	Sequential	Random 4k	Deep queue 4k
Samsung 970 Evo NVMe PCIe M.2 500GB-$43 381,216 User benchmarks, average bench 273% 186GB free (System drive) Firmware: 2B2QEXE7 Max speed: PCIe 16,000 MB/s Relative performance n/a - sequential test incomplete		Read 2,530 Write 2,321 Mixed 1448 466% 2,100 MB/s	4K Read 64.5 4K Write 146 4K Mixed 83.6 282% 98.1 MB/s	DQ Read 1,651 DQ Write 1070 DQ Mixed 1,264 969% 1,329 MB/s
Poor: 199% Great: 340%
Samsung 850 Evo 500GB-$90 695,664 User benchmarks, average bench 112% 154GB free Firmware: EMT02B6Q SusWrite @10s intervals: 466 485 459 368 310 305 MB/s Performing below expectations (27^th percentile)	102% Outstanding	Read 500 Write 480 Mixed 396 SusWrite 399 100% 444 MB/s	4K Read 42.8 4K Write 88.5 4K Mixed 49 174% 60.1 MB/s	DQ Read 67.6 DQ Write 113 DQ Mixed 158 101% 113 MB/s
Poor: 80% ↑ This bench: 102% Great: 134%
Samsung 840 Evo 250GB-$95 217,115 User benchmarks, average bench 96% 29GB free Firmware: EXT0BB0Q Relative performance n/a - sequential test incomplete		Read 498 Write 436 Mixed 387 98% 441 MB/s	4K Read 43.5 4K Write 85.3 4K Mixed 52.6 178% 60.5 MB/s	DQ Read 374 DQ Write 341 DQ Mixed 228 207% 315 MB/s
Poor: 64% Great: 118%
WD Blue 640GB (2008)-$33 94,563 User benchmarks, average bench 50% 94GB free Firmware: 01.03B01 SusWrite @10s intervals: 82 82 85 85 85 85 MB/s Performing as expected (51^st percentile)	51% Above average	Read 93.3 Write 95.2 Mixed 63.9 SusWrite 84 62% 84.1 MB/s	4K Read 0.8 4K Write 2.2 4K Mixed 0.9 174% 1.3 MB/s
Poor: 31% ↑ This bench: 51% Great: 62%
Seagate Barracuda 7200.14 2TB-$50 815,515 User benchmarks, average bench 88% 340GB free Firmware: CC43 SusWrite @10s intervals: 148 154 157 155 156 157 MB/s Performing below expectations (28^th percentile)	77.4% Very good	Read 115 Write 89.8 Mixed 72.4 SusWrite 155 79% 108 MB/s	4K Read 0.7 4K Write 1.6 4K Mixed 0.7 137% 1 MB/s
Poor: 51% ↑ This bench: 77.4% Great: 114%
D4-310 TerraMaster_DAS 4TB 12 User benchmarks, average bench 56% 482GB free Firmware: 0 SusWrite @10s intervals: 83 79 83 82 83 83 MB/s Performing below expectations (33^rd percentile)	46.2% Average	Read 78.5 Write 81.6 Mixed 13.4 SusWrite 82.1 46% 63.9 MB/s	4K Read 1 4K Write 1.9 4K Mixed 0.7 155% 1.2 MB/s
Poor: 32% ↑ This bench: 46.2% Great: 71%
D4-310 TerraMaster_DAS 4TB 12 User benchmarks, average bench 56% 3TB free Firmware: 0 SusWrite @10s intervals: 167 167 168 168 167 167 MB/s Relative performance n/a - RAM cached drive detected
Poor: 32% Great: 71%
Generic STORAGE DEVICE 128GB 536 User benchmarks, average bench 33% 60GB free, PID 0743 Operating at USB 3.0 Speed SusWrite @10s intervals: 30 25 17 36 23 34 MB/s Performing way below expectations (20^th percentile)	23.2% Poor	Read 89.2 Write 50.5 Mixed 64.6 SusWrite 27.4 72% 57.9 MB/s	4K Read 6.3 4K Write 0.9 4K Mixed 0 54% 2.4 MB/s
Poor: 14% ↑ This bench: 23.2% Great: 45%
INTENSO USB 4GB 78 User benchmarks, average bench 6% 0GB free, PID 1000 Operating at USB 2.0 Speed SusWrite @10s intervals: 7.8 8.3 8.3 7.6 7.8 8.3 MB/s Performing way above expectations (89^th percentile)	7.03% Terrible	Read 18.9 Write 5 Mixed 6.7 SusWrite 8 11% 9.65 MB/s	4K Read 10.8 4K Write 0 4K Mixed 0 40% 3.6 MB/s
Poor: 4% ↑ This bench: 7.03% Great: 8%

Memory Kit	Bench	Multi core	Single core	Latency
G.SKILL F4 DDR4 3200 C16 2x16GB 6,768 User benchmarks, average bench 90% 2 of 4 slots used 32GB DIMM DDR4 clocked @ 3200 MHz Performing above expectations (81^st percentile)	101% Outstanding	MC Read 37.8 MC Write 39.6 MC Mixed 29 101% 35.5 GB/s	SC Read 22.5 SC Write 44.3 SC Mixed 32 94% 32.9 GB/s	Latency 54.1 74% 54.1 ns
Poor: 64% ↑ This bench: 101% Great: 115%

Take a copy of your results How to check your in-game FPS

System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Custom PC Builder (Explore upgrades for this PC) Build your perfect PC: compare component prices, popularity, speed and value for money

CHOOSE AN UPGRADE:

CPU

GPU

SSD

HDD

RAM

MBD

Typical GA-Z390 AORUS MASTER-CF Builds (Compare 8,510 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings

Gaming 152%

UFO

Desktop 102%

UFO

Workstation 151%

UFO

Motherboard: Gigabyte Z390 AORUS MASTER - $380

CPU
Core i9-9900KIntel $410Bench 98%, 354,223 samples	4,870x
Core i7-9700KIntel $295Bench 97%, 550,833 samples	1,610x
Core i9-9900KFIntel $295Bench 98%, 50,265 samples	557x

GPU
RTX 2080-TiNvidia $441Bench 156%, 357,946 samples	1,304x
RTX 3080Nvidia $600Bench 187%, 424,051 samples	650x
RTX 3080-TiNvidia $660Bench 204%, 155,335 samples	641x

SSD
970 Evo Plus NVMe PCIe M.2 1TBSamsung $67Bench 310%, 455,997 samples	857x
970 Evo NVMe PCIe M.2 1TBSamsung $158Bench 297%, 331,647 samples	567x
970 Evo Plus NVMe PCIe M.2 500GBSamsung $43Bench 276%, 367,854 samples	489x

RAM
CMW16GX4M2C3200C16 4x8GBCorsairBench 92%, 92,358 samples	289x
Trident Z DDR4 3200 C16 4x8GBG.SKILL $113Bench 91%, 87,239 samples	278x
Vengeance RGB PRO DDR4 3200 C16 2x16GBCorsair $114Bench 89%, 144,399 samples	255x

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER

Value: 91% - Outstanding

Total price: $1,298

CPU	GPU	SSD
Intel Core i5-13600K $269	Nvidia RTX 4060 $295	Crucial MX500 250GB $40
Intel Core i5-12400F $133	Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385	Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-12600K $177	Nvidia RTX 4070 $539	Samsung 860 Evo 250GB $52

HDD	RAM	USB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $39	Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $45	SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $37	Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $43	SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $51	G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351	SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16