Monster TULPAR T7 V5.3

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 34%
Sail boat
Desktop
Desktop 90%
Aircraft carrier
Workstation
Workstation 30%
Sail boat
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing above expectations (72nd percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 28 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
ProcessorWith a brilliant single core score, this CPU is the business: It demolishes everyday tasks such as web browsing, office apps and audio/video playback. Additionally this processor can handle moderate workstation, and even light server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 83.9%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is very good.
Graphics33% is a below average 3D score (RTX 2060S = 100%). This GPU can handle older games but it will struggle to render recent games at resolutions greater than 1080p. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Boot Drive101% is a very good SSD score. This drive is suitable for moderate workstation use, it will facilitate fast boots, responsive applications and ensure minimum IO wait times.
Memory16GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's more than sufficient for nearly all games. 16GB also allows for very large file and system caches, software development and batch photo editing/processing.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.
Run History
SystemMonster TULPAR T7 V5.3  (all builds)
MotherboardMONSTER TULPAR T7 V5.3
Memory11 GB free of 16 GB @ 2.4 GHz
Display1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit renk
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20160517
Uptime3.1 Days
Run DateSep 02 '20 at 12:50
Run Duration124 Seconds
Run User TUR-User
Background CPU2%

 PC Performing above expectations (72nd percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
Intel Core i7-6700K-$170
U3E1, 1 CPU, 4 cores, 8 threads
Base clock 4 GHz, turbo 4 GHz (avg)
Performing above expectations (72nd percentile)
83.9% Excellent
Memory 91.9
1-Core 126
2-Core 242
86% 153 Pts
4-Core 408
8-Core 686
67% 547 Pts
64-Core 685
42% 685 Pts
Poor: 70%
This bench: 83.9%
Great: 90%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
Nvidia GeForce GTX 970M
Clevo(1558 7703) ≥ 4GB
CLim: 1038 MHz, MLim: 1252 MHz, Ram: 6GB, Driver: 441.66
Performing way above expectations (93rd percentile)
33% Below average
Lighting 40.6
Reflection 41.7
Parallax 37.9
33% 40.1 fps
MRender 44
Gravity 40.1
Splatting 37.2
33% 40.5 fps
Poor: 25%
This bench: 33%
Great: 33%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Samsung 850 Pro 512GB-$182
106GB free (System drive)
Firmware: EXM04B6Q
SusWrite @10s intervals: 167 140 133 130 117 121 MB/s
Performing as expected (47th percentile)
101% Outstanding
Read 495
Write 315
Mixed 352
SusWrite 135
72% 324 MB/s
4K Read 39.3
4K Write 112
4K Mixed 54.8
189% 68.8 MB/s
DQ Read 381
DQ Write 260
DQ Mixed 320
239% 320 MB/s
Poor: 71%
This bench: 101%
Great: 124%
Toshiba Notebook SSHD 2.5" 1TB
810GB free
Firmware: HKF05A
SusWrite @10s intervals: 105 108 108 108 108 108 MB/s
Performing above expectations (80th percentile)
55.8% Above average
Read 87
Write 90
Mixed 30.8
SusWrite 108
57% 78.8 MB/s
4K Read 0.5
4K Write 1
4K Mixed 0.6
106% 0.7 MB/s
Poor: 24%
This bench: 55.8%
Great: 64%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Unknown CT8G4SFS824A.C8FDD1 Kingston 9905700-012.A00G 16GB
2400, 2400 MHz
8192, 8192 MB
Performing above expectations (70th percentile)
75.8% Very good
MC Read 29.3
MC Write 28.7
MC Mixed 21.6
76% 26.5 GB/s
SC Read 17.2
SC Write 29.1
SC Mixed 24.8
68% 23.7 GB/s
Latency 64.2
62% 64.2 ns
Poor: 74%
This bench: 75.8%
Great: 77%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Typical TULPAR T7 V5.3 Builds (Compare 4 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 32%
Sail boat
Desktop
Desktop 87%
Aircraft carrier
Workstation
Workstation 28%
Raft

System: Monster TULPAR T7 V5.3

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 52% - Above average Total price: $352
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate thousands of reddit accounts. Our benchmarks expose their spiel so they attack our reputation.
Why don’t PC brands endorse UserBenchmark?
Brands make boatloads on flagships like the 4090 and 14900KS. We help users get similar real-world performance for less money.
Why don’t youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't pay youtubers, so they don't praise us. Moreover, our data obstructs youtubers who promote overpriced or inferior products.
Why does UserBenchmark have negative trustpilot reviews?
The 200+ trustpilot reviews are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users don't give a monkey's about big brands.
Why is UserBenchmark popular with users?
Instead of pursuing brands for sponsorship, we've spent 13 years publishing real-world data for users.
The Best
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $169Nvidia RTX 4060 $293WD Black SN850X M.2 2TB $135
Intel Core i5-12400F $110Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385WD Black SN850X M.2 1TB $89
Intel Core i5-13600K $249Nvidia RTX 4070 $549Crucial T700 M.2 4TB $369
Today's hottest deals
If you buy something via a price link, UserBenchmark may earn a commission
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback