Monster TULPAR T7 V5.3

Performance Results


Gaming 36% Jet ski	Desktop 91% Nuclear submarine	Workstation 31% Sail boat


PC Status	Overall this PC is performing way above expectations (93rd percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 7 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components. This PC is likely operated by a technical master!
Processor	With an outstanding single core score, this CPU is the cat's whiskers: It demolishes everyday tasks such as web browsing, office apps and audio/video playback. Additionally this processor can handle moderate workstation, and even light server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 88.1%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is very good.
Graphics	33.7% is a below average 3D score (RTX 2060S = 100%). This GPU can handle older games but it will struggle to render recent games at resolutions greater than 1080p. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Boot Drive	122% is an exceptional SSD score. This drive is suitable for heavy workstation use, it will facilitate fast boots, responsive applications and allow for fast transfers of multi-gigabyte files.
Memory	16GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's more than sufficient for nearly all games. 16GB also allows for very large file and system caches, software development and batch photo editing/processing.
OS Version	Although Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.

Run History

4 years ago, 4 years ago, 4 years ago, 3 years ago.

System	Monster TULPAR T7 V5.3 (all builds)
Motherboard	MONSTER TULPAR T7 V5.3
Memory	12.9 GB free of 16 GB @ 2.4 GHz
Display	1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit renk
OS	Windows 10
BIOS Date	20160517
Uptime	0 Days
Run Date	Oct 31 '19 at 18:19
Run Duration	123 Seconds
Run User	TUR-User
Background CPU	7%

PC Performing way above expectations (93^rd percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor	Bench	Normal	Heavy	Server
Intel Core i7-6700K-$219 588,978 User benchmarks, average bench 81% U3E1, 1 CPU, 4 cores, 8 threads Base clock 4 GHz, turbo 4 GHz (avg) Performing way above expectations (92^nd percentile)	88.1% Excellent	Memory 92.4 1-Core 126 2-Core 238 86% 152 Pts	4-Core 451 8-Core 653 69% 552 Pts	64-Core 698 43% 698 Pts
Poor: 70% ↑ This bench: 88.1% Great: 90%

Graphics Card	Bench	3D DX9	3D DX10	3D DX11
Nvidia GeForce GTX 970M 6,247 User benchmarks, average bench 31% Clevo(1558 7703) ≥ 4GB CLim: 1038 MHz, MLim: 1252 MHz, Ram: 6GB, Driver: 440.97 Performing below potential (98^th percentile) - Disable monitor sync before benchmarking (43 fps cap detected)	33.7% Below average	Lighting 42 Reflection 42.3 Parallax 42.5 34% 42.3 fps	MRender 43.9 Gravity 40.7 Splatting 36.7 33% 40.4 fps
Poor: 25% ↑ This bench: 33.7% Great: 33%

Drives	Bench	Sequential	Random 4k	Deep queue 4k
Samsung 850 Pro 512GB-$182 68,849 User benchmarks, average bench 102% 420GB free (System drive) Firmware: EXM04B6Q SusWrite @10s intervals: 432 465 463 470 470 466 MB/s Performing way above expectations (93^rd percentile)	122% Outstanding	Read 488 Write 462 Mixed 346 SusWrite 461 99% 439 MB/s	4K Read 42 4K Write 116 4K Mixed 50.8 190% 69.7 MB/s	DQ Read 371 DQ Write 322 DQ Mixed 326 250% 340 MB/s
Poor: 71% ↑ This bench: 122% Great: 124%
Toshiba Notebook SSHD 2.5" 1TB 27,655 User benchmarks, average bench 47% 931GB free Firmware: HKF05A SusWrite @10s intervals: 110 109 112 109 111 111 MB/s Performing way above expectations (92^nd percentile)	61.2% Good	Read 103 Write 108 Mixed 34 SusWrite 110 64% 88.8 MB/s	4K Read 0.5 4K Write 1.1 4K Mixed 0.6 108% 0.73 MB/s
Poor: 24% ↑ This bench: 61.2% Great: 64%

Memory Kit	Bench	Multi core	Single core	Latency
Unknown CT8G4SFS824A.C8FDD1 Kingston 9905700-012.A00G 16GB 5 User benchmarks, average bench 75% 2400, 2400 MHz 8192, 8192 MB Performing way above expectations (90^th percentile)	76.1% Very good	MC Read 29.2 MC Write 29 MC Mixed 21.8 76% 26.7 GB/s	SC Read 18.2 SC Write 28.8 SC Mixed 24.2 68% 23.7 GB/s	Latency 63.2 63% 63.2 ns
Poor: 74% ↑ This bench: 76.1% Great: 77%

Take a copy of your results How to check your in-game FPS

System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Custom PC Builder (Explore upgrades for this PC) Build your perfect PC: compare component prices, popularity, speed and value for money

CHOOSE AN UPGRADE:

CPU

GPU

SSD

HDD

RAM

MBD

Typical TULPAR T7 V5.3 Builds (Compare 4 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings

Gaming 32%

Sail boat

Desktop 87%

Aircraft carrier

Workstation 28%

Raft

System: Monster TULPAR T7 V5.3

CPU
Core i7-6700KIntel $219Bench 81%, 588,978 samples	4x

GPU
GeForce GTX 970MNvidiaBench 31%, 6,247 samples	2x
GeForce GTX 980MNvidiaBench 39%, 10,379 samples	1x
Quadro M3000MNvidiaBench 27%, 1,726 samples	1x

SSD
850 Pro 512GBSamsung $182Bench 102%, 68,849 samples	2x
SSDSCKKW480H6 480GBIntelBench 81%, 1,815 samples	1x

RAM
CT8G4SFS824A.C8FDD1 Kingston 9905700-012.A00G 16GBUnknownBench 75%, 5 samples	2x
KHX2400C14S4/8G GKE160SO102408-2133 KHX2400C14S4/8G 1321 SP016GBSFU213B02 48GBKingstonBench 70%, 1 sample	1x
GKE800SO51208-2400AH 4x8GBHynixBench 81%, 1 sample	1x

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER

Value: 54% - Above average

Total price: $401

CPU	GPU	SSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $171	Nvidia RTX 4060 $293	Crucial MX500 250GB $39
Intel Core i5-12400F $128	Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385	Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-13600K $260	Nvidia RTX 4070 $550	Samsung 870 Evo 250GB $45

HDD	RAM	USB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $39	Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $40	SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $32	Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $48	SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $62	G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351	SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16