Monster TULPAR T7 V5.3

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 33%
Sail boat
Desktop
Desktop 90%
Aircraft carrier
Workstation
Workstation 30%
Sail boat
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing above expectations (64th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 36 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
ProcessorWith a brilliant single core score, this CPU is the business: It demolishes everyday tasks such as web browsing, office apps and audio/video playback. Additionally this processor can handle moderate workstation, and even light server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 81.8%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is very good.
Graphics33.3% is a below average 3D score (RTX 2060S = 100%). This GPU can handle older games but it will struggle to render recent games at resolutions greater than 1080p. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Boot Drive119% is an exceptional SSD score. This drive is suitable for heavy workstation use, it will facilitate fast boots, responsive applications and allow for fast transfers of multi-gigabyte files.
Memory16GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's more than sufficient for nearly all games. 16GB also allows for very large file and system caches, software development and batch photo editing/processing.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.
Very high background CPU (36%). High background CPU reduces benchmark accuracy. How to reduce background CPU.
Run History
SystemMonster TULPAR T7 V5.3  (all builds)
MotherboardMONSTER TULPAR T7 V5.3
Memory11.6 GB free of 16 GB @ 2.4 GHz
Display1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit renk
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20160517
Uptime0.2 Days
Run DateDec 12 '19 at 15:55
Run Duration124 Seconds
Run User TUR-User
Background CPU 36%

 PC Performing above expectations (64th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
Intel Core i7-6700K-$170
U3E1, 1 CPU, 4 cores, 8 threads
Base clock 4 GHz, turbo 4 GHz (avg)
Performing as expected (57th percentile)
81.8% Excellent
Memory 92.1
1-Core 126
2-Core 244
87% 154 Pts
4-Core 385
8-Core 688
65% 536 Pts
64-Core 694
43% 694 Pts
Poor: 70%
This bench: 81.8%
Great: 90%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
Nvidia GeForce GTX 970M
Clevo(1558 7703) ≥ 4GB
CLim: 1038 MHz, MLim: 1252 MHz, Ram: 6GB, Driver: 441.41
Performing way above expectations (93rd percentile)
33.3% Below average
Lighting 41.2
Reflection 41.8
Parallax 38.2
34% 40.4 fps
MRender 44.2
Gravity 40.2
Splatting 37.3
33% 40.6 fps
Poor: 25%
This bench: 33.3%
Great: 33%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Samsung 850 Pro 512GB-$182
168GB free (System drive)
Firmware: EXM04B6Q
SusWrite @10s intervals: 445 416 454 446 467 445 MB/s
Performing way above expectations (89th percentile)
119% Outstanding
Read 490
Write 477
Mixed 381
SusWrite 446
101% 448 MB/s
4K Read 39.9
4K Write 95.1
4K Mixed 53.6
180% 62.9 MB/s
DQ Read 382
DQ Write 344
DQ Mixed 337
260% 354 MB/s
Poor: 71%
This bench: 119%
Great: 124%
Toshiba Notebook SSHD 2.5" 1TB
346GB free
Firmware: HKF05A
SusWrite @10s intervals: 85 86 87 87 87 87 MB/s
Performing above expectations (72nd percentile)
52.8% Above average
Read 97.5
Write 92.3
Mixed 32.5
SusWrite 86.5
56% 77.2 MB/s
4K Read 0.5
4K Write 1.1
4K Mixed 0.6
108% 0.73 MB/s
Poor: 24%
This bench: 52.8%
Great: 64%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Unknown CT8G4SFS824A.C8FDD1 Kingston 9905700-012.A00G 16GB
2400, 2400 MHz
8192, 8192 MB
Performing below potential (10th percentile) - ensure that a dual+ channel XMP BIOS profile is enabled: How to enable XMP
73.6% Very good
MC Read 28.7
MC Write 27.1
MC Mixed 21.4
74% 25.7 GB/s
SC Read 16.6
SC Write 28
SC Mixed 24
65% 22.9 GB/s
Latency 63.9
63% 63.9 ns
Poor: 74%
This bench: 73.6%
Great: 77%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Typical TULPAR T7 V5.3 Builds (Compare 4 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 32%
Sail boat
Desktop
Desktop 87%
Aircraft carrier
Workstation
Workstation 28%
Raft

System: Monster TULPAR T7 V5.3

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 52% - Above average Total price: $352
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate thousands of reddit accounts. Our benchmarks expose their spiel so they attack our reputation.
Why don’t PC brands endorse UserBenchmark?
Brands make boatloads on flagships like the 4090 and 14900KS. We help users get similar real-world performance for less money.
Why don’t youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't pay youtubers, so they don't praise us. Moreover, our data obstructs youtubers who promote overpriced or inferior products.
Why does UserBenchmark have negative trustpilot reviews?
The 200+ trustpilot reviews are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users don't give a monkey's about big brands.
Why is UserBenchmark popular with users?
Instead of pursuing brands for sponsorship, we've spent 13 years publishing real-world data for users.
The Best
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $169Nvidia RTX 4060 $293WD Black SN850X M.2 2TB $150
Intel Core i5-12400F $110Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385WD Black SN850X M.2 1TB $89
Intel Core i5-13600K $249Nvidia RTX 4070 $549Crucial T700 M.2 4TB $369
Today's hottest deals
If you buy something via a price link, UserBenchmark may earn a commission
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback