Monster TULPAR T7 V5.3

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 36%
Jet ski
Desktop
Desktop 92%
Nuclear submarine
Workstation
Workstation 32%
Sail boat
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing above expectations (84th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 16 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
ProcessorWith an outstanding single core score, this CPU is the cat's whiskers: It demolishes everyday tasks such as web browsing, office apps and audio/video playback. Additionally this processor can handle moderate workstation, and even light server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 89.9%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is very good.
Graphics33.8% is a below average 3D score (RTX 2060S = 100%). This GPU can handle older games but it will struggle to render recent games at resolutions greater than 1080p. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Boot Drive122% is an exceptional SSD score. This drive is suitable for heavy workstation use, it will facilitate fast boots, responsive applications and allow for fast transfers of multi-gigabyte files.
Memory16GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's more than sufficient for nearly all games. 16GB also allows for very large file and system caches, software development and batch photo editing/processing.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.
Run History
SystemMonster TULPAR T7 V5.3  (all builds)
MotherboardMONSTER TULPAR T7 V5.3
Memory13.6 GB free of 16 GB @ 2.4 GHz
Display1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit renk
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20160517
Uptime0 Days
Run DateOct 31 '19 at 09:04
Run Duration125 Seconds
Run User TUR-User
Background CPU2%

 PC Performing above expectations (84th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
Intel Core i7-6700K-$170
U3E1, 1 CPU, 4 cores, 8 threads
Base clock 4 GHz, turbo 4 GHz (avg)
Performing way above expectations (97th percentile)
89.9% Excellent
Memory 92.5
1-Core 123
2-Core 249
87% 155 Pts
4-Core 471
8-Core 687
72% 579 Pts
64-Core 697
43% 697 Pts
Poor: 70%
This bench: 89.9%
Great: 90%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
Nvidia GeForce GTX 970M
Clevo(1558 7703) ≥ 4GB
CLim: 1038 MHz, MLim: 1252 MHz, Ram: 6GB, Driver: 389.27
Performing way above expectations (98th percentile)
33.8% Below average
Lighting 42.2
Reflection 42.7
Parallax 38.5
34% 41.2 fps
MRender 43.9
Gravity 40.9
Splatting 36.6
33% 40.4 fps
Poor: 25%
This bench: 33.8%
Great: 33%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Samsung 850 Pro 512GB-$182
451GB free (System drive)
Firmware: EXM04B6Q
SusWrite @10s intervals: 467 440 441 454 461 451 MB/s
Performing way above expectations (94th percentile)
122% Outstanding
Read 472
Write 454
Mixed 350
SusWrite 452
97% 432 MB/s
4K Read 38.5
4K Write 127
4K Mixed 54.6
196% 73.3 MB/s
DQ Read 360
DQ Write 336
DQ Mixed 329
252% 342 MB/s
Poor: 71%
This bench: 122%
Great: 124%
Toshiba Notebook SSHD 2.5" 1TB
931GB free
Firmware: HKF05A
SusWrite @10s intervals: 98 102 103 107 106 102 MB/s
Performing way above expectations (92nd percentile)
61.1% Good
Read 110
Write 101
Mixed 34.9
SusWrite 103
63% 87.3 MB/s
4K Read 0.6
4K Write 1.1
4K Mixed 0.6
112% 0.77 MB/s
Poor: 24%
This bench: 61.1%
Great: 64%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Unknown CT8G4SFS824A.C8FDD1 Kingston 9905700-012.A00G 16GB
2400, 2400 MHz
8192, 8192 MB
Performing as expected (40th percentile)
74.3% Very good
MC Read 29
MC Write 27.9
MC Mixed 21.1
74% 26 GB/s
SC Read 16.3
SC Write 29.2
SC Mixed 23.8
66% 23.1 GB/s
Latency 63.2
63% 63.2 ns
Poor: 74%
This bench: 74.3%
Great: 77%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Typical TULPAR T7 V5.3 Builds (Compare 4 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 32%
Sail boat
Desktop
Desktop 87%
Aircraft carrier
Workstation
Workstation 28%
Raft

System: Monster TULPAR T7 V5.3

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 52% - Above average Total price: $352
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate thousands of reddit accounts. Our benchmarks expose their spiel so they attack our reputation.
Why don’t PC brands endorse UserBenchmark?
Brands make boatloads on flagships like the 4090 and 14900KS. We help users get similar real-world performance for less money.
Why don’t youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't pay youtubers, so they don't praise us. Moreover, our data obstructs youtubers who promote overpriced or inferior products.
Why does UserBenchmark have negative trustpilot reviews?
The 200+ trustpilot reviews are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users don't give a monkey's about big brands.
Why is UserBenchmark popular with users?
Instead of pursuing brands for sponsorship, we've spent 13 years publishing real-world data for users.
The Best
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $169Nvidia RTX 4060 $293WD Black SN850X M.2 2TB $150
Intel Core i5-12400F $110Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385WD Black SN850X M.2 1TB $89
Intel Core i5-13600K $249Nvidia RTX 4070 $549Crucial T700 M.2 4TB $369
Today's hottest deals
If you buy something via a price link, UserBenchmark may earn a commission
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback