Asus P8Z68-V PRO

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 22%
Surfboard
Desktop
Desktop 77%
Battleship
Workstation
Workstation 18%
Surfboard
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing above expectations (70th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 30 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
ProcessorWith a good single core score, this CPU can easily handle the majority of general computing tasks. Despite its good single core score this processor isn't appropriate for workstation use due to its relatively weak multi-core performance. Finally, with a gaming score of 71.7%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is good.
Graphics25.4% is a below average 3D score (RTX 2060S = 100%). This GPU can handle older games but it will struggle to render recent games at resolutions greater than 1080p. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Boot Drive45.5% is a reasonable SSD score. This drive enables fast boots and responsive applications.
Memory10GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's more than sufficient for nearly all games. 10GB also allows for very large file and system caches, software development and batch photo editing/processing.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 8.1 is a recent version of Windows, it's worth upgrading to Windows 10 which has had several improvements made to the user interface including a better homescreen.
Run History
MotherboardAsus P8Z68-V PRO  (all builds)
Memory7.2 GB free of 10 GB @ 1.3 GHz
Display1920x1080x4294967296 szín
OSWindows 8.1
BIOS Date20121109
Uptime0.1 Days
Run DateMar 26 '17 at 18:30
Run Duration112 Seconds
Run User HUN-User
Background CPU10%

 PC Performing above expectations (70th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
Intel Core i5-2400-$250
LGA1155, 1 CPU, 4 cores, 4 threads
Base clock 3.1 GHz, turbo 3.2 GHz (avg)
Performing way above expectations (99th percentile)
71.7% Very good
Memory 90
1-Core 85.2
2-Core 169
68% 115 Pts
4-Core 309
8-Core 315
42% 312 Pts
64-Core 330
20% 330 Pts
Poor: 42%
This bench: 71.7%
Great: 70%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
AMD HD 6970
Asus(1043 03B8) 2GB
Driver: aticfx64.dll Ver. 15.200.1062.1004
Performing way above expectations (100th percentile)
25.4% Poor
Lighting 33.5
Reflection 24.5
Parallax 27.5
27% 28.5 fps
MRender 21.5
Gravity 26.2
Splatting 30.3
22% 26 fps
Poor: 17%
This bench: 25.4%
Great: 22%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Samsung 840 Evo 120GB-$85
16GB free (System drive)
Firmware: EXT0BB6Q Max speed: SATA 3.0 600 MB/s
Performing way below expectations (2nd percentile)
45.5% Average
Read 339
Write 161
Mixed 193
51% 231 MB/s
4K Read 23.7
4K Write 26.4
4K Mixed 15
69% 21.7 MB/s
DQ Read 29.7
DQ Write 34.9
DQ Mixed 13.2
15% 25.9 MB/s
Poor: 63%
This bench: 45.5%
Great: 108%
WD Blue 500GB (2010)-$24
56GB free
Firmware: 15.01H15 Max speed: SATA 2.0 300 MB/s
Performing above expectations (80th percentile)
63.5% Good
Read 131
Write 89.8
Mixed 82.6
76% 101 MB/s
4K Read 0.41
4K Write 1.81
4K Mixed 0.23
76% 0.82 MB/s
Poor: 24%
This bench: 63.5%
Great: 69%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Unknown FLGD45F-B8KL9 Kingston KHX1866C10D3/4G 8325 FLGD45F-B8KJ9 Kingston KHX1866C10D3/4G 10GB
1333, 1333, 1333, 1333 MHz
1024, 4096, 1024, 4096 MB
Relative performance n/a - insufficient samples
49.8% Average
MC Read 16.9
MC Write 18.2
MC Mixed 15.8
48% 17 GB/s
SC Read 13.8
SC Write 15.3
SC Mixed 15.9
43% 15 GB/s
Latency 67.3
60% 67.3 ns

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Typical P8Z68-V PRO Builds (Compare 1,457 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 38%
Jet ski
Desktop
Desktop 78%
Battleship
Workstation
Workstation 31%
Sail boat

Motherboard: Asus P8Z68-V PRO - $390

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 60% - Above average Total price: $985
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate countless reddit accounts. UserBenchmark’s data exposes their marketing charade so they attack our reputation.
Why don’t PC brands endorse UserBenchmark?
PC brands profit a lot from flagships like the 4090, 14900KS, and 7950X3D. We help users get similar real-world performance for less money.
Why don’t youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't sponsor youtubers, so they've no incentive to praise us. Moreover, brands pay youtubers extra to market inferior products. UserBenchmark's data challenges the marketing and exposes the youtubers' biases.
Why does UserBenchmark have negative trustpilot reviews?
Trustpilot hosts user-generated online reviews. The 200+ UserBenchmark reviews, are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users aren't interested in promoting billon-dollar brands.
Why is UserBenchmark popular with users?
Instead of chasing lucrative sponsorships with billion-dollar PC brands, we've dedicated 13 years to publishing accurate real-world data which saves our users millions every year.
The Best.
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $176Nvidia RTX 4060 $293Crucial MX500 250GB $39
Intel Core i5-12400F $120Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-13600K $260Nvidia RTX 4070 $549Samsung 870 Evo 250GB $44
HDDRAMUSB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $37Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $40SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $28Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $48SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $62G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16
If you make a purchase via one of these links, our site may earn a commission
Today's hottest deals
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback