Asus P8P67 EVO

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 75%
Battleship
Desktop
Desktop 89%
Aircraft carrier
Workstation
Workstation 63%
Destroyer
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing as expected (49th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 51 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
ProcessorWith a brilliant single core score, this CPU is the business: It demolishes everyday tasks such as web browsing, office apps and audio/video playback. Additionally this processor can handle moderate workstation, and even light server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 86.2%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is very good.
Graphics83.4% is a very good 3D score, it's the business. This GPU can handle recent 3D games at high resolutions and ultra detail levels.
Boot Drive87.6% is a very good SSD score. This drive is suitable for moderate workstation use, it will facilitate fast boots, responsive applications and ensure minimum IO wait times.
Memory16GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's more than sufficient for nearly all games. 16GB also allows for very large file and system caches, software development and batch photo editing/processing.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.
Sub-optimal background CPU (15%). High background CPU reduces benchmark accuracy. How to reduce background CPU.
Run History
MotherboardAsus P8P67 EVO  (all builds)
Memory13.2 GB free of 16 GB @ 2.2 GHz
Display2560 x 1440 - 32 Bit colors
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20121101
Uptime0 Days
Run DateAug 21 '20 at 16:28
Run Duration182 Seconds
Run User MEX-User
Background CPU 15%
Watch Gameplay: 1660-Ti + 9600K How to compare your gameplay

 PC Performing as expected (49th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
Intel Core i7-3770K-$175
LGA1155, 1 CPU, 4 cores, 8 threads
Base clock 3.5 GHz, turbo 4.2 GHz (avg)
Performing way above expectations (99th percentile)
86.2% Excellent
Memory 96.8
1-Core 120
2-Core 212
83% 143 Pts
4-Core 408
8-Core 607
63% 508 Pts
64-Core 607
38% 607 Pts
Poor: 59%
This bench: 86.2%
Great: 83%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
Nvidia GTX 1660-Ti-$143
CLim: 2235 MHz, MLim: 3225 MHz, Ram: 6GB, Driver: 452.06
Performing way above expectations (100th percentile)
83.4% Excellent
Lighting 106
Reflection 99.1
Parallax 92.3
86% 99 fps
MRender 115
Gravity 93.8
Splatting 84.5
78% 97.8 fps
Poor: 70%
This bench: 83.4%
Great: 81%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Samsung 840 Evo 500GB-$150
160GB free (System drive)
Firmware: EXT0DB6Q
SusWrite @10s intervals: 199 215 240 226 229 222 MB/s
Performing way below expectations (16th percentile)
87.6% Excellent
Read 459
Write 436
Mixed 376
SusWrite 222
84% 373 MB/s
4K Read 28.7
4K Write 75.2
4K Mixed 35
128% 46.3 MB/s
DQ Read 382
DQ Write 350
DQ Mixed 240
215% 324 MB/s
Poor: 72%
This bench: 87.6%
Great: 126%
Crucial MX500 1TB-$88
132GB free
Firmware: M3CR032
SusWrite @10s intervals: 187 204 229 238 237 240 MB/s
Performing way below expectations (12th percentile)
88.4% Excellent
Read 469
Write 436
Mixed 389
SusWrite 223
85% 379 MB/s
4K Read 27.2
4K Write 77.9
4K Mixed 36.1
129% 47.1 MB/s
DQ Read 381
DQ Write 351
DQ Mixed 290
238% 341 MB/s
Poor: 75%
This bench: 88.4%
Great: 125%
Samsung Spinpoint T166 500GB-$40
390GB free
Firmware: CR100-10
SusWrite @10s intervals: 38 38 38 37 38 38 MB/s
Performing way below expectations (11th percentile)
24% Poor
Read 45.5
Write 59.6
Mixed 39.2
SusWrite 37.8
34% 45.5 MB/s
4K Read 0.7
4K Write 1.1
4K Mixed 0.6
116% 0.8 MB/s
Poor: 22%
This bench: 24%
Great: 44%
Seagate BUP BL 4TB
2TB free
Firmware: 0304
SusWrite @10s intervals: 55 55 53 52 54 55 MB/s
Performing below expectations (37th percentile)
41.4% Average
Read 89.4
Write 81.9
Mixed 66.5
SusWrite 53.9
54% 72.9 MB/s
4K Read 0.7
4K Write 3.9
4K Mixed 0.6
168% 1.73 MB/s
Poor: 15%
This bench: 41.4%
Great: 67%
WD Elements 1TB
310GB free, PID 1042
Operating at USB 3.0 Speed
SusWrite @10s intervals: 52 51 50 53 51 52 MB/s
Performing as expected (59th percentile)
26.5% Poor
Read 70.7
Write 71.8
Mixed 47.8
SusWrite 51.5
80% 60.5 MB/s
4K Read 0.5
4K Write 1.6
4K Mixed 0.7
80% 0.93 MB/s
Poor: 12%
This bench: 26.5%
Great: 43%
WD Elements 1TB
642GB free, PID 1021
Operating at USB 2.0 Speed
SusWrite @10s intervals: 20 21 20 21 21 21 MB/s
Performing way below expectations (13th percentile)
13.6% Very poor
Read 32
Write 23.9
Mixed 23.5
SusWrite 20.7
33% 25 MB/s
4K Read 0.5
4K Write 1.4
4K Mixed 0.6
70% 0.83 MB/s
Poor: 12%
This bench: 13.6%
Great: 43%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Kingston HyperX DDR3 2133 C11 2x8GB
2 of 4 slots used
16GB DIMM DDR3 2200 MHz
Performing way above expectations (92nd percentile)
77.9% Very good
MC Read 29.6
MC Write 27.8
MC Mixed 24.2
78% 27.2 GB/s
SC Read 23.5
SC Write 21.5
SC Mixed 22.4
64% 22.5 GB/s
Latency 51
78% 51 ns
Poor: 38%
This bench: 77.9%
Great: 79%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Typical P8P67 EVO Builds (Compare 606 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 43%
Speed boat
Desktop
Desktop 78%
Battleship
Workstation
Workstation 35%
Sail boat

Motherboard: Asus P8P67 EVO - $150

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 73% - Very good Total price: $662
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate a lot of reddit accounts. UserBenchmark exposes their spiel so they attack our reputation.
Why don’t PC brands endorse UserBenchmark?
PC brands make a lot on flagships like the 4090, 14900KS, and 7950X3D. We help users get similar real-world performance for less money.
Why don’t youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't pay youtubers, so they don't praise us. Moreover, our data exposes youtubers that promote overpriced/inferior products.
Why does UserBenchmark have negative trustpilot reviews?
The 200+ reviews on trustpilot are written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users aren't incentivized to back brands.
Why is UserBenchmark popular with users?
Instead of chasing sponsorship with billion-dollar brands, we've spent 13 years publishing real-world data which saves our users millions.
The Best.
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $174Nvidia RTX 4060 $293Crucial MX500 250GB $39
Intel Core i5-12400F $120Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-13600K $260Nvidia RTX 4070 $549Samsung 870 Evo 250GB $44
HDDRAMUSB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $37Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $40SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $28Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $48SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $62G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16
If you make a purchase via one of these links, our site may earn a commission
Today's hottest deals
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback