Asus P8P67 EVO

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 65%
Destroyer
Desktop
Desktop 85%
Aircraft carrier
Workstation
Workstation 56%
Gunboat
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing as expected (44th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 56 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
ProcessorWith a brilliant single core score, this CPU is the business: It demolishes everyday tasks such as web browsing, office apps and audio/video playback. Additionally this processor can handle light workstation, and even some light server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 77.9%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is good.
Graphics78.9% is a very good 3D score, it's the business. This GPU can handle recent 3D games at high resolutions and ultra detail levels.
Boot Drive80.5% is a very good SSD score. This drive is suitable for moderate workstation use, it will facilitate fast boots, responsive applications and ensure minimum IO wait times.
Memory16GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's more than sufficient for nearly all games. 16GB also allows for very large file and system caches, software development and batch photo editing/processing.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.
High background CPU (22%). High background CPU reduces benchmark accuracy. How to reduce background CPU.
Run History
MotherboardAsus P8P67 EVO  (all builds)
Memory12.2 GB free of 16 GB @ 2.1 GHz
Display2560 x 1440 - 32 Bit colors
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20121101
Uptime0 Days
Run DateAug 13 '20 at 06:01
Run Duration184 Seconds
Run User MEX-User
Background CPU 22%
Watch Gameplay: 1660-Ti + 9600K How to compare your gameplay

 PC Performing as expected (44th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
Intel Core i7-3770K-$175
LGA1155, 1 CPU, 4 cores, 8 threads
Base clock 3.5 GHz, turbo 4.25 GHz (avg)
Performing above expectations (84th percentile)
77.9% Very good
Memory 95.5
1-Core 107
2-Core 210
80% 137 Pts
4-Core 326
8-Core 596
55% 461 Pts
64-Core 593
37% 593 Pts
Poor: 59%
This bench: 77.9%
Great: 83%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
Nvidia GTX 1660-Ti-$143
CLim: 2160 MHz, MLim: 3000 MHz, Ram: 6GB, Driver: 451.67
Performing way above expectations (89th percentile)
78.9% Very good
Lighting 101
Reflection 92.2
Parallax 85.3
83% 93 fps
MRender 103
Gravity 88.8
Splatting 76.5
72% 89.4 fps
Poor: 70%
This bench: 78.9%
Great: 81%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Samsung 840 Evo 500GB-$150
164GB free (System drive)
Firmware: EXT0DB6Q
SusWrite @10s intervals: 183 220 143 104 102 102 MB/s
Performing way below expectations (11th percentile)
80.5% Excellent
Read 464
Write 442
Mixed 376
SusWrite 142
80% 356 MB/s
4K Read 34.4
4K Write 62.1
4K Mixed 43.3
140% 46.6 MB/s
DQ Read 242
DQ Write 174
DQ Mixed 185
144% 200 MB/s
Poor: 72%
This bench: 80.5%
Great: 126%
Crucial MX500 1TB-$88
204GB free
Firmware: M3CR032
SusWrite @10s intervals: 169 199 260 291 294 292 MB/s
Performing way below expectations (9th percentile)
84.1% Excellent
Read 477
Write 424
Mixed 385
SusWrite 251
86% 384 MB/s
4K Read 27.2
4K Write 65.1
4K Mixed 39.9
127% 44.1 MB/s
DQ Read 276
DQ Write 168
DQ Mixed 214
162% 220 MB/s
Poor: 75%
This bench: 84.1%
Great: 125%
Samsung Spinpoint T166 500GB-$40
465GB free
Firmware: CR100-10
SusWrite @10s intervals: 50 51 51 51 53 51 MB/s
Performing below expectations (20th percentile)
27.1% Poor
Read 43.2
Write 22.7
Mixed 31.4
SusWrite 51.1
28% 37.1 MB/s
4K Read 0.6
4K Write 1.1
4K Mixed 0.7
123% 0.8 MB/s
Poor: 22%
This bench: 27.1%
Great: 44%
Seagate BUP BL 4TB
2TB free
Firmware: 0304
SusWrite @10s intervals: 54 56 63 69 68 68 MB/s
Performing as expected (42nd percentile)
44.4% Average
Read 90.7
Write 102
Mixed 63.7
SusWrite 63
59% 79.9 MB/s
4K Read 0.8
4K Write 3.5
4K Mixed 0.6
165% 1.63 MB/s
Poor: 15%
This bench: 44.4%
Great: 67%
WD Elements 1TB
383GB free, PID 1042
Operating at USB 3.0 Speed
SusWrite @10s intervals: 52 50 56 60 61 60 MB/s
Performing as expected (56th percentile)
25% Poor
Read 67.5
Write 68.9
Mixed 47.7
SusWrite 56.5
81% 60.1 MB/s
4K Read 0.5
4K Write 0.9
4K Mixed 0.5
50% 0.63 MB/s
Poor: 12%
This bench: 25%
Great: 43%
WD Elements 1TB
680GB free, PID 1021
Operating at USB 2.0 Speed
SusWrite @10s intervals: 19 20 21 21 21 21 MB/s
Performing way below expectations (13th percentile)
13.6% Very poor
Read 30
Write 24.8
Mixed 24.3
SusWrite 20.8
33% 25 MB/s
4K Read 0.5
4K Write 1.5
4K Mixed 0.7
77% 0.9 MB/s
Poor: 12%
This bench: 13.6%
Great: 43%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Kingston HyperX DDR3 2133 C11 2x8GB
2 of 4 slots used
16GB DIMM DDR3 2133 MHz
Performing above expectations (76th percentile)
74.1% Very good
MC Read 28.1
MC Write 26.8
MC Mixed 23.4
75% 26.1 GB/s
SC Read 21.5
SC Write 19.8
SC Mixed 21
59% 20.8 GB/s
Latency 55.6
72% 55.6 ns
Poor: 38%
This bench: 74.1%
Great: 79%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Typical P8P67 EVO Builds (Compare 603 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 43%
Speed boat
Desktop
Desktop 78%
Battleship
Workstation
Workstation 35%
Sail boat

Motherboard: Asus P8P67 EVO - $150

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 73% - Very good Total price: $662
The Best.
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $176Nvidia RTX 4060 $288Crucial MX500 250GB $39
Intel Core i5-12400F $128Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-13600K $260Nvidia RTX 4070 $550Samsung 870 Evo 250GB $45
HDDRAMUSB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $39Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $40SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $32Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $48SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $62G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16
If you make a purchase via one of these links, our site may earn a commission
Today's hottest deals
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback