Asus P8P67 EVO

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 74%
Battleship
Desktop
Desktop 89%
Aircraft carrier
Workstation
Workstation 61%
Destroyer
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing as expected (53rd percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 47 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
ProcessorWith a brilliant single core score, this CPU is the business: It demolishes everyday tasks such as web browsing, office apps and audio/video playback. Additionally this processor can handle light workstation, and even some light server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 84.4%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is very good.
Graphics83.8% is a very good 3D score, it's the business. This GPU can handle recent 3D games at high resolutions and ultra detail levels.
Boot Drive88.8% is a very good SSD score. This drive is suitable for moderate workstation use, it will facilitate fast boots, responsive applications and ensure minimum IO wait times.
Memory16GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's more than sufficient for nearly all games. 16GB also allows for very large file and system caches, software development and batch photo editing/processing.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.
Run History
MotherboardAsus P8P67 EVO  (all builds)
Memory13.1 GB free of 16 GB @ 2.2 GHz
Display2560 x 1440 - 32 Bit colors
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20121101
Uptime0 Days
Run DateAug 15 '20 at 05:07
Run Duration183 Seconds
Run User MEX-User
Background CPU1%
Watch Gameplay: 1660-Ti + 9600K How to compare your gameplay

 PC Performing as expected (53rd percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
Intel Core i7-3770K-$175
LGA1155, 1 CPU, 4 cores, 8 threads
Base clock 3.5 GHz, turbo 4.25 GHz (avg)
Performing way above expectations (98th percentile)
84.4% Excellent
Memory 96.9
1-Core 124
2-Core 209
84% 143 Pts
4-Core 390
8-Core 552
59% 471 Pts
64-Core 581
36% 581 Pts
Poor: 59%
This bench: 84.4%
Great: 83%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
Nvidia GTX 1660-Ti-$143
CLim: 2235 MHz, MLim: 3225 MHz, Ram: 6GB, Driver: 451.67
Performing way above expectations (100th percentile)
83.8% Excellent
Lighting 106
Reflection 99.5
Parallax 92.7
87% 99.5 fps
MRender 114
Gravity 94
Splatting 84
78% 97.4 fps
Poor: 70%
This bench: 83.8%
Great: 81%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Samsung 840 Evo 500GB-$150
167GB free (System drive)
Firmware: EXT0DB6Q
SusWrite @10s intervals: 194 215 239 239 241 240 MB/s
Performing way below expectations (18th percentile)
88.8% Excellent
Read 455
Write 409
Mixed 376
SusWrite 228
82% 367 MB/s
4K Read 30.3
4K Write 71.9
4K Mixed 36.7
131% 46.3 MB/s
DQ Read 380
DQ Write 348
DQ Mixed 248
218% 325 MB/s
Poor: 72%
This bench: 88.8%
Great: 126%
Crucial MX500 1TB-$84
93GB free
Firmware: M3CR032
SusWrite @10s intervals: 185 206 224 227 226 227 MB/s
Performing way below expectations (12th percentile)
88.1% Excellent
Read 470
Write 436
Mixed 379
SusWrite 216
84% 375 MB/s
4K Read 27.2
4K Write 78.6
4K Mixed 35.9
129% 47.2 MB/s
DQ Read 380
DQ Write 356
DQ Mixed 290
239% 342 MB/s
Poor: 75%
This bench: 88.1%
Great: 125%
Samsung Spinpoint T166 500GB-$40
316GB free
Firmware: CR100-10
SusWrite @10s intervals: 42 42 43 43 42 42 MB/s
Performing as expected (42nd percentile)
32.1% Below average
Read 69.2
Write 82.5
Mixed 49.2
SusWrite 42.4
45% 60.8 MB/s
4K Read 0.7
4K Write 1.1
4K Mixed 0.9
150% 0.9 MB/s
Poor: 22%
This bench: 32.1%
Great: 44%
Seagate BUP BL 4TB
2TB free
Firmware: 0304
SusWrite @10s intervals: 58 57 54 55 54 55 MB/s
Performing as expected (42nd percentile)
44.5% Average
Read 98.7
Write 100
Mixed 53.2
SusWrite 55.3
56% 76.8 MB/s
4K Read 0.7
4K Write 3.7
4K Mixed 0.6
164% 1.67 MB/s
Poor: 15%
This bench: 44.5%
Great: 67%
WD Elements 1TB
383GB free, PID 1042
Operating at USB 3.0 Speed
SusWrite @10s intervals: 50 52 48 49 49 48 MB/s
Performing as expected (59th percentile)
26.6% Poor
Read 74.7
Write 76.9
Mixed 49.6
SusWrite 49.2
83% 62.6 MB/s
4K Read 0.5
4K Write 1.6
4K Mixed 0.6
77% 0.9 MB/s
Poor: 12%
This bench: 26.6%
Great: 43%
WD Elements 1TB
642GB free, PID 1021
Operating at USB 2.0 Speed
SusWrite @10s intervals: 20 21 21 21 21 21 MB/s
Performing way below expectations (13th percentile)
13.8% Very poor
Read 31.2
Write 24.9
Mixed 23
SusWrite 20.7
33% 25 MB/s
4K Read 0.5
4K Write 1.5
4K Mixed 0.6
73% 0.87 MB/s
Poor: 12%
This bench: 13.8%
Great: 43%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Kingston HyperX DDR3 2133 C11 2x8GB
2 of 4 slots used
16GB DIMM DDR3 2200 MHz
Performing way above expectations (92nd percentile)
77.8% Very good
MC Read 29.6
MC Write 27.8
MC Mixed 24.1
78% 27.2 GB/s
SC Read 22.3
SC Write 22
SC Mixed 23.1
64% 22.5 GB/s
Latency 50.6
79% 50.6 ns
Poor: 38%
This bench: 77.8%
Great: 79%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Typical P8P67 EVO Builds (Compare 605 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 43%
Speed boat
Desktop
Desktop 78%
Battleship
Workstation
Workstation 35%
Sail boat

Motherboard: Asus P8P67 EVO - $150

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 72% - Very good Total price: $666
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate thousands of reddit accounts. Our benchmarks expose their spiel so they attack our reputation.
Why don’t PC brands endorse UserBenchmark?
Brands make boatloads on flagships like the 4090 and 14900KS. We help users get similar real-world performance for less money.
Why don’t youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't pay youtubers, so they don't praise us. Moreover, our data obstructs youtubers who promote overpriced or inferior products.
Why does UserBenchmark have negative trustpilot reviews?
The 200+ trustpilot reviews are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users don't give a monkey's about big brands.
Why is UserBenchmark popular with users?
Instead of pursuing brands for sponsorship, we've spent 13 years publishing real-world data for users.
The Best
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $169Nvidia RTX 4060 $293WD Black SN850X M.2 2TB $150
Intel Core i5-12400F $110Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385WD Black SN850X M.2 1TB $89
Intel Core i5-13600K $249Nvidia RTX 4070 $549Crucial T700 M.2 4TB $369
Today's hottest deals
If you buy something via a price link, UserBenchmark may earn a commission
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback