Asus P8P67 EVO

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 70%
Battleship
Desktop
Desktop 90%
Nuclear submarine
Workstation
Workstation 59%
Gunboat
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing as expected (48th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 52 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
ProcessorWith an outstanding single core score, this CPU is the cat's whiskers: It demolishes everyday tasks such as web browsing, office apps and audio/video playback. Additionally this processor can handle light workstation, and even some light server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 84.7%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is very good.
Graphics79% is a very good 3D score, it's the business. This GPU can handle recent 3D games at high resolutions and ultra detail levels.
Boot Drive84.8% is a very good SSD score. This drive is suitable for moderate workstation use, it will facilitate fast boots, responsive applications and ensure minimum IO wait times.
Memory16GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's more than sufficient for nearly all games. 16GB also allows for very large file and system caches, software development and batch photo editing/processing.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.
Run History
MotherboardAsus P8P67 EVO  (all builds)
Memory12.9 GB free of 16 GB @ 2.1 GHz
Display2560 x 1440 - 32 Bit colors
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20121101
Uptime0.1 Days
Run DateAug 13 '20 at 09:02
Run Duration183 Seconds
Run User MEX-User
Background CPU4%
Watch Gameplay: 1660-Ti + 9600K How to compare your gameplay

 PC Performing as expected (48th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
Intel Core i7-3770K-$175
LGA1155, 1 CPU, 4 cores, 8 threads
Base clock 3.5 GHz, turbo 4.25 GHz (avg)
Performing way above expectations (98th percentile)
84.7% Excellent
Memory 96.5
1-Core 122
2-Core 238
87% 152 Pts
4-Core 394
8-Core 619
62% 506 Pts
64-Core 622
38% 622 Pts
Poor: 59%
This bench: 84.7%
Great: 83%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
Nvidia GTX 1660-Ti-$143
CLim: 2160 MHz, MLim: 3000 MHz, Ram: 6GB, Driver: 451.67
Performing way above expectations (89th percentile)
79% Very good
Lighting 101
Reflection 93
Parallax 93.1
82% 95.7 fps
MRender 104
Gravity 88.9
Splatting 76.9
72% 90 fps
Poor: 70%
This bench: 79%
Great: 81%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Samsung 840 Evo 500GB-$150
163GB free (System drive)
Firmware: EXT0DB6Q
SusWrite @10s intervals: 160 210 235 173 103 102 MB/s
Performing way below expectations (13th percentile)
84.8% Excellent
Read 471
Write 445
Mixed 365
SusWrite 164
81% 361 MB/s
4K Read 28.9
4K Write 75.8
4K Mixed 35.2
129% 46.6 MB/s
DQ Read 384
DQ Write 349
DQ Mixed 244
217% 326 MB/s
Poor: 72%
This bench: 84.8%
Great: 126%
Crucial MX500 1TB-$84
194GB free
Firmware: M3CR032
SusWrite @10s intervals: 156 200 220 260 305 306 MB/s
Performing way below expectations (12th percentile)
89.3% Excellent
Read 472
Write 431
Mixed 379
SusWrite 241
85% 381 MB/s
4K Read 27.3
4K Write 75.6
4K Mixed 35.9
127% 46.3 MB/s
DQ Read 380
DQ Write 354
DQ Mixed 290
239% 341 MB/s
Poor: 75%
This bench: 89.3%
Great: 125%
Samsung Spinpoint T166 500GB-$40
465GB free
Firmware: CR100-10
SusWrite @10s intervals: 58 58 58 59 58 58 MB/s
Performing below expectations (28th percentile)
28.7% Poor
Read 41.7
Write 28.6
Mixed 26
SusWrite 58
28% 38.6 MB/s
4K Read 0.6
4K Write 0.9
4K Mixed 0.9
142% 0.8 MB/s
Poor: 22%
This bench: 28.7%
Great: 44%
Seagate BUP BL 4TB
2TB free
Firmware: 0304
SusWrite @10s intervals: 56 57 54 60 68 69 MB/s
Performing below expectations (37th percentile)
41.6% Average
Read 83.5
Write 88.4
Mixed 65.4
SusWrite 60.6
55% 74.5 MB/s
4K Read 0.6
4K Write 3.8
4K Mixed 0.6
162% 1.67 MB/s
Poor: 15%
This bench: 41.6%
Great: 67%
WD Elements 1TB
383GB free, PID 1042
Operating at USB 3.0 Speed
SusWrite @10s intervals: 50 52 48 54 60 60 MB/s
Performing as expected (57th percentile)
25.3% Poor
Read 69.2
Write 70.5
Mixed 47.7
SusWrite 54.1
81% 60.4 MB/s
4K Read 0.5
4K Write 1.1
4K Mixed 0.5
56% 0.7 MB/s
Poor: 12%
This bench: 25.3%
Great: 43%
WD Elements 1TB
680GB free, PID 1021
Operating at USB 2.0 Speed
SusWrite @10s intervals: 19 21 20 21 22 21 MB/s
Performing way below expectations (13th percentile)
13.7% Very poor
Read 30.7
Write 23.6
Mixed 24
SusWrite 20.7
32% 24.8 MB/s
4K Read 0.6
4K Write 1.5
4K Mixed 0.6
74% 0.9 MB/s
Poor: 12%
This bench: 13.7%
Great: 43%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Kingston HyperX DDR3 2133 C11 2x8GB
2 of 4 slots used
16GB DIMM DDR3 2133 MHz
Performing above expectations (83rd percentile)
75.5% Very good
MC Read 28.8
MC Write 26.8
MC Mixed 23.2
75% 26.3 GB/s
SC Read 22.5
SC Write 22
SC Mixed 22.2
64% 22.2 GB/s
Latency 52.2
77% 52.2 ns
Poor: 38%
This bench: 75.5%
Great: 79%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Typical P8P67 EVO Builds (Compare 605 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 43%
Speed boat
Desktop
Desktop 78%
Battleship
Workstation
Workstation 35%
Sail boat

Motherboard: Asus P8P67 EVO - $150

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 72% - Very good Total price: $666
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate thousands of reddit accounts. Our benchmarks expose their spiel so they attack our reputation.
Why don’t PC brands endorse UserBenchmark?
Brands make boatloads on flagships like the 4090 and 14900KS. We help users get similar real-world performance for less money.
Why don’t youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't pay youtubers, so they don't praise us. Moreover, our data obstructs youtubers who promote overpriced or inferior products.
Why does UserBenchmark have negative trustpilot reviews?
The 200+ trustpilot reviews are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users don't give a monkey's about big brands.
Why is UserBenchmark popular with users?
Instead of pursuing brands for sponsorship, we've spent 13 years publishing real-world data for users.
The Best
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $169Nvidia RTX 4060 $293WD Black SN850X M.2 2TB $150
Intel Core i5-12400F $110Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385WD Black SN850X M.2 1TB $89
Intel Core i5-13600K $249Nvidia RTX 4070 $549Crucial T700 M.2 4TB $369
Today's hottest deals
If you buy something via a price link, UserBenchmark may earn a commission
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback