Gigabyte GA-H110M-A

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 49%
Yacht
Desktop
Desktop 84%
Aircraft carrier
Workstation
Workstation 42%
Speed boat
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing above expectations (76th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 24 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
ProcessorWith a brilliant single core score, this CPU is the business: It demolishes everyday tasks such as web browsing, office apps and audio/video playback. Additionally this processor can handle light workstation, and even some light server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 82%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is very good.
Graphics53.6% is a reasonable 3D score (RTX 2060S = 100%). This GPU can handle the majority of recent games but it will struggle with resolutions greater than 1080p at ultra detail levels. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Boot Drive115% is an exceptional SSD score. This drive is suitable for heavy workstation use, it will facilitate fast boots, responsive applications and allow for fast transfers of multi-gigabyte files.
Memory16GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's more than sufficient for nearly all games. 16GB also allows for very large file and system caches, software development and batch photo editing/processing.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 7 is still a viable option, it's now 14 years and 10 months old. This system should be upgraded to Windows 10 which is generally faster and has an improved set of core utilities including better versions of explorer and task manager.
High background CPU (28%). High background CPU reduces benchmark accuracy. How to reduce background CPU.
Run History
MotherboardGigabyte GA-H110M-A  (all builds)
Memory13.4 GB free of 16 GB @ 2.1 GHz
Display1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit colors
OSWindows 7
BIOS Date20160307
Uptime0 Days
Run DateAug 20 '20 at 00:02
Run Duration135 Seconds
Run User USA-User
Background CPU 28%

 PC Performing above expectations (76th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
Intel Core i7-6700-$170
U3E1, 1 CPU, 4 cores, 8 threads
Base clock 3.4 GHz
Performing way above expectations (99th percentile)
82% Excellent
Memory 84.4
1-Core 110
2-Core 206
76% 134 Pts
4-Core 429
8-Core 645
67% 537 Pts
64-Core 652
40% 652 Pts
Poor: 60%
This bench: 82%
Great: 80%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
AMD R9 290-$399
CLim: 995 MHz, MLim: 1400 MHz, Ram: 4GB, Driver: 20.7.2
Performing way above expectations (100th percentile)
53.6% Above average
Lighting 66.5
Reflection 58.7
Parallax 80.4
54% 68.5 fps
MRender 58.8
Gravity 54.9
Splatting 74
52% 62.5 fps
Poor: 41%
This bench: 53.6%
Great: 50%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Samsung 850 Evo 500GB-$94
172GB free (System drive)
Firmware: EMT0
SusWrite @10s intervals: 380 393 358 410 299 226 MB/s
Performing as expected (55th percentile)
115% Outstanding
Read 471
Write 441
Mixed 388
SusWrite 344
92% 411 MB/s
4K Read 40.3
4K Write 115
4K Mixed 55.2
193% 70.3 MB/s
DQ Read 372
DQ Write 320
DQ Mixed 343
258% 345 MB/s
Poor: 80%
This bench: 115%
Great: 134%
WD WD1001FALS-00J7B 1TB
409GB free
Firmware: 05.0
SusWrite @10s intervals: 83 86 86 86 86 87 MB/s
Performing as expected (49th percentile)
50.2% Above average
Read 89
Write 83.8
Mixed 66
SusWrite 85.5
60% 81.1 MB/s
4K Read 0.8
4K Write 2.5
4K Mixed 0.9
180% 1.4 MB/s
Poor: 34%
This bench: 50.2%
Great: 61%
Seagate Barracuda 7200.12 500GB-$25
932GB free
Firmware: CC46
SusWrite @10s intervals: 118 123 121 123 124 124 MB/s
Performing way above expectations (93rd percentile)
69.3% Good
Read 119
Write 119
Mixed 64.8
SusWrite 122
78% 106 MB/s
4K Read 0.7
4K Write 1.9
4K Mixed 1
176% 1.2 MB/s
Poor: 28%
This bench: 69.3%
Great: 70%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
G.SKILL Value DDR4 2400 C15 2x8GB
2 of 4 slots used
16GB DIMM DDR4 clocked @ 2133 MHz
Performing above expectations (63rd percentile)
74.8% Very good
MC Read 28
MC Write 29
MC Mixed 23.9
77% 27 GB/s
SC Read 15.1
SC Write 26.3
SC Mixed 21.1
60% 20.8 GB/s
Latency 72.8
55% 72.8 ns
Poor: 53%
This bench: 74.8%
Great: 87%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Typical GA-H110M-A-CF Builds (Compare 1,644 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 42%
Speed boat
Desktop
Desktop 74%
Battleship
Workstation
Workstation 34%
Sail boat

Motherboard: Gigabyte GA-H110M-A - $60

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 109% - Outstanding Total price: $305
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketing teams operate large numbers of reddit accounts. When UserBenchmark’s data contradicts their marketing spiel, they deflect by systematically attacking our reputation.
Why don’t large PC brands support UserBenchmark?
PC brands make a large proportion lot of their profit from flagship hardware sales (4090, 14900KS, 7950X3D etc.). UserBenchmark's data helps consumers to choose hardware that offers similar real world performance at a fraction of the cost.
Why don’t any youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't sponsor youtubers, so they have no incentive to make positive content about us. In addition, the brands with weaker products tend to spend more on youtube marketing, which puts their youtubers at odds with UserBenchmark.
Why does UserBenchmark have so many negative trustpilot reviews?
Trustpilot hosts user-generated reviews in an online community that's open and accessible to all. Looking at its 200+ UserBenchmark reviews, which are mostly written by virgin accounts, it is glaringly obvious that they were created by a marketing team. Real users don’t have any time or interest to promote one brand over another.
Why is UserBenchmark so popular with users?
Instead of trying to win lucrative sponsorship deals with billion dollar PC brands, we have spent the last 13 years 100% focussed on providing comprehensive, accurate and relevant information for our users. As a result, most of our users return over and over again because collectively they save millions of dollars every year.
The Best.
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $159Nvidia RTX 4060 $280Crucial MX500 250GB $39
Intel Core i5-12400F $120Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-13600K $260Nvidia RTX 4070 $550Samsung 870 Evo 250GB $45
HDDRAMUSB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $37Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $40SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $39Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $48SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $62G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16
If you make a purchase via one of these links, our site may earn a commission
Today's hottest deals
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback