Gigabyte GA-H110M-A

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 46%
Yacht
Desktop
Desktop 87%
Aircraft carrier
Workstation
Workstation 40%
Speed boat
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing above expectations (77th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 23 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
ProcessorWith a brilliant single core score, this CPU is the business: It demolishes everyday tasks such as web browsing, office apps and audio/video playback. Additionally this processor can handle light workstation, and even some light server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 80.2%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is very good.
Graphics50.5% is a reasonable 3D score (RTX 2060S = 100%). This GPU can handle the majority of recent games but it will struggle with resolutions greater than 1080p at ultra detail levels. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Boot Drive114% is an exceptional SSD score. This drive is suitable for heavy workstation use, it will facilitate fast boots, responsive applications and allow for fast transfers of multi-gigabyte files.
Memory16GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's more than sufficient for nearly all games. 16GB also allows for very large file and system caches, software development and batch photo editing/processing.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 7 is still a viable option, it's now 14 years and 10 months old. This system should be upgraded to Windows 10 which is generally faster and has an improved set of core utilities including better versions of explorer and task manager.
Run History
MotherboardGigabyte GA-H110M-A  (all builds)
Memory13.4 GB free of 16 GB @ 2.1 GHz
Display1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit colors
OSWindows 7
BIOS Date20160307
Uptime0 Days
Run DateJul 20 '20 at 06:32
Run Duration136 Seconds
Run User USA-User
Background CPU4%

 PC Performing above expectations (77th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
Intel Core i7-6700-$170
U3E1, 1 CPU, 4 cores, 8 threads
Base clock 3.4 GHz
Performing way above expectations (96th percentile)
80.2% Excellent
Memory 88.5
1-Core 120
2-Core 235
83% 148 Pts
4-Core 387
8-Core 656
63% 521 Pts
64-Core 652
40% 652 Pts
Poor: 60%
This bench: 80.2%
Great: 80%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
AMD R9 290-$399
CLim: 957 MHz, MLim: 1300 MHz, Ram: 4GB, Driver: 20.4.2
Performing way above expectations (98th percentile)
50.5% Above average
Lighting 62.2
Reflection 55.5
Parallax 75.3
51% 64.3 fps
MRender 56.4
Gravity 52
Splatting 71.7
50% 60 fps
Poor: 41%
This bench: 50.5%
Great: 50%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Samsung 850 Evo 500GB-$94
178GB free (System drive)
Firmware: EMT0
SusWrite @10s intervals: 346 367 155 89 88 184 MB/s
Performing as expected (53rd percentile)
114% Outstanding
Read 473
Write 457
Mixed 398
SusWrite 205
86% 383 MB/s
4K Read 41.1
4K Write 134
4K Mixed 64.4
216% 79.7 MB/s
DQ Read 374
DQ Write 324
DQ Mixed 345
260% 348 MB/s
Poor: 80%
This bench: 114%
Great: 134%
WD WD1001FALS-00J7B 1TB
423GB free
Firmware: 05.0
SusWrite @10s intervals: 86 87 86 86 87 85 MB/s
Performing as expected (49th percentile)
50.3% Above average
Read 88.5
Write 86.8
Mixed 64.8
SusWrite 86.2
60% 81.6 MB/s
4K Read 0.9
4K Write 2.3
4K Mixed 0.9
180% 1.37 MB/s
Poor: 34%
This bench: 50.3%
Great: 61%
Seagate Barracuda 7200.12 500GB-$25
932GB free
Firmware: CC46
SusWrite @10s intervals: 124 124 123 124 125 123 MB/s
Performing way above expectations (95th percentile)
69.7% Good
Read 119
Write 113
Mixed 66.8
SusWrite 124
78% 106 MB/s
4K Read 0.7
4K Write 1.8
4K Mixed 1
174% 1.17 MB/s
Poor: 28%
This bench: 69.7%
Great: 70%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
G.SKILL Value DDR4 2400 C15 2x8GB
2 of 4 slots used
16GB DIMM DDR4 clocked @ 2133 MHz
Performing above expectations (69th percentile)
76.4% Very good
MC Read 28.5
MC Write 29.1
MC Mixed 23.8
78% 27.1 GB/s
SC Read 17.1
SC Write 28.8
SC Mixed 23.1
66% 23 GB/s
Latency 69
58% 69 ns
Poor: 53%
This bench: 76.4%
Great: 87%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Typical GA-H110M-A-CF Builds (Compare 1,644 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 42%
Speed boat
Desktop
Desktop 74%
Battleship
Workstation
Workstation 34%
Sail boat

Motherboard: Gigabyte GA-H110M-A - $60

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 109% - Outstanding Total price: $305
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketing teams operate large numbers of reddit accounts. When UserBenchmark’s data contradicts their marketing spiel, they deflect by systematically attacking our reputation.
Why don’t large PC brands support UserBenchmark?
PC brands make a large proportion lot of their profit from flagship hardware sales (4090, 14900KS, 7950X3D etc.). UserBenchmark's data helps consumers to choose hardware that offers similar real world performance at a fraction of the cost.
Why don’t any youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't sponsor youtubers, so they have no incentive to make positive content about us. In addition, the brands with weaker products tend to spend more on youtube marketing, which puts their youtubers at odds with UserBenchmark.
Why does UserBenchmark have so many negative trustpilot reviews?
Trustpilot hosts user-generated reviews in an online community that's open and accessible to all. Looking at its 200+ UserBenchmark reviews, which are mostly written by virgin accounts, it is glaringly obvious that they were created by a marketing team. Real users don’t have any time or interest to promote one brand over another.
Why is UserBenchmark so popular with users?
Instead of trying to win lucrative sponsorship deals with billion dollar PC brands, we have spent the last 13 years 100% focussed on providing comprehensive, accurate and relevant information for our users. As a result, most of our users return over and over again because collectively they save millions of dollars every year.
The Best.
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $159Nvidia RTX 4060 $280Crucial MX500 250GB $39
Intel Core i5-12400F $120Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-13600K $260Nvidia RTX 4070 $550Samsung 870 Evo 250GB $45
HDDRAMUSB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $37Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $40SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $39Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $48SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $62G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16
If you make a purchase via one of these links, our site may earn a commission
Today's hottest deals
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback