Gigabyte GA-H110M-A

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 46%
Yacht
Desktop
Desktop 87%
Aircraft carrier
Workstation
Workstation 40%
Speed boat
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing above expectations (74th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 26 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
ProcessorWith a brilliant single core score, this CPU is the business: It demolishes everyday tasks such as web browsing, office apps and audio/video playback. Additionally this processor can handle light workstation, and even some light server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 81.2%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is very good.
Graphics50.3% is a reasonable 3D score (RTX 2060S = 100%). This GPU can handle the majority of recent games but it will struggle with resolutions greater than 1080p at ultra detail levels. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Boot Drive113% is an exceptional SSD score. This drive is suitable for heavy workstation use, it will facilitate fast boots, responsive applications and allow for fast transfers of multi-gigabyte files.
Memory16GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's more than sufficient for nearly all games. 16GB also allows for very large file and system caches, software development and batch photo editing/processing.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 7 is still a viable option, it's now 14 years and 10 months old. This system should be upgraded to Windows 10 which is generally faster and has an improved set of core utilities including better versions of explorer and task manager.
Sub-optimal background CPU (20%). High background CPU reduces benchmark accuracy. How to reduce background CPU.
Run History
MotherboardGigabyte GA-H110M-A  (all builds)
Memory12.1 GB free of 16 GB @ 2.1 GHz
Display1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit colors
OSWindows 7
BIOS Date20160307
Uptime0.4 Days
Run DateMar 21 '20 at 02:36
Run Duration136 Seconds
Run User USA-User
Background CPU 20%

 PC Performing above expectations (74th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
Intel Core i7-6700-$170
U3E1, 1 CPU, 4 cores, 8 threads
Base clock 3.4 GHz
Performing way above expectations (98th percentile)
81.2% Excellent
Memory 89.5
1-Core 117
2-Core 228
82% 145 Pts
4-Core 393
8-Core 640
63% 516 Pts
64-Core 633
39% 633 Pts
Poor: 60%
This bench: 81.2%
Great: 80%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
AMD R9 290-$399
CLim: 947 MHz, MLim: 1250 MHz, Ram: 4GB, Driver: 20.2.2
Performing way above expectations (96th percentile)
50.3% Above average
Lighting 62.3
Reflection 55.7
Parallax 75.7
51% 64.6 fps
MRender 53.8
Gravity 52.7
Splatting 69.9
49% 58.8 fps
Poor: 41%
This bench: 50.3%
Great: 50%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Samsung 850 Evo 500GB-$76
148GB free (System drive)
Firmware: EMT0
SusWrite @10s intervals: 418 258 231 211 217 218 MB/s
Performing as expected (51st percentile)
113% Outstanding
Read 442
Write 438
Mixed 386
SusWrite 259
86% 381 MB/s
4K Read 39
4K Write 132
4K Mixed 60.9
207% 77.3 MB/s
DQ Read 372
DQ Write 320
DQ Mixed 344
258% 345 MB/s
Poor: 80%
This bench: 113%
Great: 134%
WD WD1001FALS-00J7B 1TB
386GB free
Firmware: 05.0
SusWrite @10s intervals: 71 72 70 70 70 69 MB/s
Performing below expectations (38th percentile)
46.4% Average
Read 91.3
Write 91
Mixed 65.8
SusWrite 70.3
59% 79.6 MB/s
4K Read 0.7
4K Write 1
4K Mixed 0.9
148% 0.87 MB/s
Poor: 34%
This bench: 46.4%
Great: 61%
Seagate Barracuda 7200.12 500GB-$25
465GB free
Firmware: CC46
SusWrite @10s intervals: 123 122 121 121 122 120 MB/s
Performing way above expectations (95th percentile)
69.9% Good
Read 122
Write 119
Mixed 64.5
SusWrite 122
78% 107 MB/s
4K Read 0.7
4K Write 1.9
4K Mixed 1
176% 1.2 MB/s
Poor: 28%
This bench: 69.9%
Great: 70%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
G.SKILL Value DDR4 2400 C15 2x8GB
2 of 4 slots used
16GB DIMM DDR4 clocked @ 2133 MHz
Performing above expectations (63rd percentile)
75.3% Very good
MC Read 27.2
MC Write 29
MC Mixed 23.9
76% 26.7 GB/s
SC Read 16
SC Write 28.5
SC Mixed 23.1
64% 22.5 GB/s
Latency 67.9
59% 67.9 ns
Poor: 53%
This bench: 75.3%
Great: 87%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Typical GA-H110M-A-CF Builds (Compare 1,650 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 42%
Speed boat
Desktop
Desktop 74%
Battleship
Workstation
Workstation 34%
Sail boat

Motherboard: Gigabyte GA-H110M-A - $60

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 109% - Outstanding Total price: $304
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate thousands of reddit accounts. Our benchmarks expose their spiel so they attack our reputation.
Why don’t PC brands endorse UserBenchmark?
Brands make boatloads on flagships like the 4090 and 14900KS. We help users get similar real-world performance for less money.
Why don’t youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't pay youtubers, so they don't praise us. Moreover, our data exposes youtubers that promote overpriced/inferior products.
Why does UserBenchmark have negative trustpilot reviews?
The 200+ trustpilot reviews are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users don't give a monkey's about big brands.
Why is UserBenchmark popular with users?
Instead of pursuing brands for sponsorship, we've spent 13 years publishing real-world data for users.
The Best
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $174Nvidia RTX 4060 $293Crucial MX500 250GB $39
Intel Core i5-12400F $110Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-13600K $260Nvidia RTX 4070 $549Samsung 870 Evo 250GB $48
Today's hottest deals
If you buy something via a price link, UserBenchmark may earn a commission
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback