Asrock X99 Extreme4

Performance Results


Gaming 50% Yacht	Desktop 86% Aircraft carrier	Workstation 45% Speed boat


PC Status	Overall this PC is performing as expected (56th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 44 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
Processor	With a brilliant single core score, this CPU is the business: It demolishes everyday tasks such as web browsing, office apps and audio/video playback. Additionally this processor can handle moderate workstation, and even light server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 83.3%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is very good.
Graphics	53.4% is a reasonable 3D score (RTX 2060S = 100%). This GPU can handle the majority of recent games but it will struggle with resolutions greater than 1080p at ultra detail levels. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Boot Drive	52% is a reasonable SSD score. This drive enables fast boots and responsive applications.
Memory	12GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's more than sufficient for nearly all games. 12GB also allows for very large file and system caches, software development and batch photo editing/processing.
OS Version	Although Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.

Sub-optimal background CPU (19%). High background CPU reduces benchmark accuracy. How to reduce background CPU.

Run History

7 years ago, 7 years ago, 7 years ago, 7 years ago, 7 years ago, 7 years ago.

Motherboard	Asrock X99 Extreme4 (all builds)
Memory	8.9 GB free of 12 GB @ 2.4 GHz
Display	1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit colors
OS	Windows 10
BIOS Date	20160302
Uptime	0 Days
Run Date	Mar 20 '17 at 06:39
Run Duration	142 Seconds
Run User	USA-User
Background CPU	19%

PC Performing as expected (56^th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor	Bench	Normal	Heavy	Server
Intel Core i7-5820K-$130 101,694 User benchmarks, average bench 77% CPUSocket, 1 CPU, 6 cores, 12 threads Base clock 3.3 GHz, turbo 3.1 GHz (avg) Performing way above expectations (86^th percentile)	83.3% Excellent	Memory 91.7 1-Core 101 2-Core 204 77% 132 Pts	4-Core 404 8-Core 642 64% 523 Pts	64-Core 798 49% 798 Pts
Poor: 68% ↑ This bench: 83.3% Great: 88%

Graphics Card	Bench	3D DX9	3D DX10	3D DX11
Nvidia GTX 970-$200 834,238 User benchmarks, average bench 49% EVGA(3842 3975) CLim: 1531 MHz, MLim: 1752 MHz, Ram: 4GB, Driver: 378.78 Performing way above expectations (92^nd percentile)	53.4% Above average	Lighting 66.8 Reflection 69.1 Parallax 61.4 54% 65.8 fps	MRender 71 Gravity 65 Splatting 55.7 52% 63.9 fps
Poor: 43% ↑ This bench: 53.4% Great: 54%

Drives	Bench	Sequential	Random 4k	Deep queue 4k
OCZ VERTEX3 90GB 979 User benchmarks, average bench 64% 60GB free (System drive) Firmware: 2.25 Max speed: SATA 3.0 600 MB/s Performing way below expectations (9^th percentile) (ID) Attribute Now Worst Value (01) Raw read error rate 107 107 14697759 (05) Reallocated sector count 100 100 0 (09) Power-on hours count 59 59 114306259651755 (0C) Power cycle count 100 100 333 (AB) Unknown 0 0 0 (AC) Unknown 0 0 0 (AE) Unknown 0 0 269 (B1) Unknown 0 0 7 (B5) Unknown 0 0 0 (B6) Unknown 0 0 0 (BB) vendor-specific 100 100 0 (C2) HDA temperature 30 30 128850984990 (C3) Hardware ECC recovered 120 120 14697759 (C4) Reallocation count 100 100 0 (C9) Soft read error rate 120 120 14697759 (CC) Soft ECC correction 120 120 14697759 (E6) GMR head amplitude 100 100 100 (E7) Temperature 94 94 0 (E9) Unknown 0 0 24653 (EA) Unknown 0 0 20533 (F1) Unknown 0 0 20533 (F2) Unknown 0 0 10687	52% Above average	Read 420 Write 118 Mixed 183 52% 240 MB/s	4K Read 16.6 4K Write 66.4 4K Mixed 13.3 77% 32.1 MB/s	DQ Read 124 DQ Write 118 DQ Mixed 10.4 38% 83.9 MB/s
Poor: 50% ↑ This bench: 52% Great: 77%
Samsung 850 Evo 250GB-$100 951,591 User benchmarks, average bench 103% 19GB free Firmware: EMT02B6Q Max speed: SATA 3.0 600 MB/s Performing below expectations (24^th percentile) (ID) Attribute Now Worst Value (05) Reallocated sector count 100 100 0 (09) Power-on hours count 98 98 9374 (0C) Power cycle count 99 99 179 (B1) Unknown 96 96 73 (B3) Unknown 100 100 0 (B5) Unknown 100 100 0 (B6) Unknown 100 100 0 (B7) Unknown 100 100 0 (BB) vendor-specific 100 100 0 (BE) vendor-specific 68 47 32 (C3) Hardware ECC recovered 200 200 0 (C7) UDMA CRC error rate 100 100 0 (EB) Unknown 99 99 108 (F1) Unknown 99 99 27299803127	94.3% Outstanding	Read 502 Write 402 Mixed 418 98% 441 MB/s	4K Read 31.3 4K Write 59.8 4K Mixed 32.4 121% 41.2 MB/s	DQ Read 312 DQ Write 261 DQ Mixed 102 126% 225 MB/s
Poor: 72% ↑ This bench: 94.3% Great: 124%
WD Blue 500GB (2010)-$23 496,077 User benchmarks, average bench 53% 14GB free Firmware: 18.01H18 Max speed: SATA 3.0 600 MB/s Performing as expected (44^th percentile) (ID) Attribute Now Worst Value (01) Raw read error rate 200 200 0 (03) Spinup time 138 136 4075 (04) Start/Stop count 100 100 665 (05) Reallocated sector count 200 200 0 (07) Seek error rate 100 253 0 (09) Power-on hours count 51 51 36114 (0A) Spinup retry count 100 100 0 (0B) Calibration retry count 100 100 0 (0C) Power cycle count 100 100 558 (B8) Unknown 100 100 0 (BB) vendor-specific 100 100 0 (BC) Unknown 100 100 0 (BE) vendor-specific 67 43 555810849 (C0) Power-off retract count 200 200 245 (C1) Load/Unload cycle count 200 200 419 (C4) Reallocation count 200 200 0 (C5) Current pending sector count 200 200 0 (C6) Offline scan uncorrectable count 200 200 0 (C7) UDMA CRC error rate 200 200 0 (C8) Write error rate 200 200 0	51.5% Above average	Read 99.2 Write 80.2 Mixed 112 74% 97.2 MB/s	4K Read 0.43 4K Write 1.73 4K Mixed 0.37 91% 0.84 MB/s
Poor: 24% ↑ This bench: 51.5% Great: 69%

Memory Kit	Bench	Multi core	Single core	Latency
Crucial BLS4G4D240FSA.8FADG 3x4GB 31 User benchmarks, average bench 67% 3 of 8 slots used 12GB DIMM DDR4 clocked @ 2400 MHz Performing above expectations (81^st percentile)	85% Excellent	MC Read 36.9 MC Write 29.9 MC Mixed 29.5 92% 32.1 GB/s	SC Read 13.9 SC Write 18.3 SC Mixed 18.6 48% 16.9 GB/s	Latency 64.6 62% 64.6 ns
Poor: 46% ↑ This bench: 85% Great: 87%

Take a copy of your results How to check your in-game FPS

System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Custom PC Builder (Explore upgrades for this PC) Build your perfect PC: compare component prices, popularity, speed and value for money

CHOOSE AN UPGRADE:

CPU

GPU

SSD

HDD

RAM

MBD

Typical X99 Extreme4 Builds (Compare 820 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings

Gaming 82%

Aircraft carrier

Desktop 82%

Aircraft carrier

Workstation 73%

Battleship

Motherboard: Asrock X99 Extreme4 - $261

CPU
Core i7-5820KIntel $130Bench 77%, 101,694 samples	475x
Core i7-6800KIntel $103Bench 81%, 50,196 samples	110x
Core i7-5960XIntel $504Bench 80%, 15,468 samples	48x

GPU
GTX 1080Nvidia $195Bench 102%, 1,082,454 samples	86x
GTX 970Nvidia $200Bench 49%, 834,238 samples	77x
GTX 1080-TiNvidia $485Bench 124%, 840,268 samples	46x

SSD
850 Evo 500GBSamsung $76Bench 112%, 695,664 samples	44x
850 Evo 250GBSamsung $100Bench 103%, 951,591 samples	34x
970 Evo Plus NVMe PCIe M.2 1TBSamsung $99Bench 310%, 455,997 samples	21x

RAM
Vengeance LPX DDR4 2400 C14 4x4GBCorsair $97Bench 83%, 3,926 samples	14x
Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 4x8GBCorsairBench 87%, 76,101 samples	9x
Ballistix Sport DDR4 2400 C16 4x4GBCrucial $84Bench 97%, 1,914 samples	9x

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER

Value: 92% - Outstanding

Total price: $759

CPU	GPU	SSD
Intel Core i5-12400F $110	Nvidia RTX 4060 $293	Crucial MX500 250GB $39
Intel Core i5-12600K $174	Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385	Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-13600K $260	Nvidia RTX 4070 $549	Samsung 870 Evo 250GB $48