Asrock X99 Extreme4

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 54%
Yacht
Desktop
Desktop 86%
Aircraft carrier
Workstation
Workstation 48%
Yacht
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing as expected (57th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 43 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
ProcessorWith a brilliant single core score, this CPU is the business: It demolishes everyday tasks such as web browsing, office apps and audio/video playback. Additionally this processor can handle moderate workstation, and even light server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 83.7%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is very good.
Graphics57.2% is a reasonable 3D score (RTX 2060S = 100%). This GPU can handle the majority of recent games but it will struggle with resolutions greater than 1080p at ultra detail levels. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Boot Drive86.7% is a very good SSD score. This drive is suitable for moderate workstation use, it will facilitate fast boots, responsive applications and ensure minimum IO wait times.
Memory12GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's more than sufficient for nearly all games. 12GB also allows for very large file and system caches, software development and batch photo editing/processing.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.
Run History
MotherboardAsrock X99 Extreme4  (all builds)
Memory10 GB free of 12 GB @ 2.4 GHz
Display1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit colors
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20160302
Uptime0 Days
Run DateMar 18 '17 at 02:03
Run Duration143 Seconds
Run User USA-User
Background CPU0%

 PC Performing as expected (57th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
Intel Core i7-5820K-$130
CPUSocket, 1 CPU, 6 cores, 12 threads
Base clock 3.3 GHz, turbo 3.4 GHz (avg)
Performing way above expectations (89th percentile)
83.7% Excellent
Memory 92
1-Core 105
2-Core 211
78% 136 Pts
4-Core 406
8-Core 674
66% 540 Pts
64-Core 804
50% 804 Pts
Poor: 68%
This bench: 83.7%
Great: 88%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
Nvidia GTX 970-$200
CLim: 1531 MHz, MLim: 1752 MHz, Ram: 4GB, Driver: 378.49
Performing way above expectations (100th percentile)
57.2% Above average
Lighting 72.5
Reflection 71.8
Parallax 65.9
59% 70.1 fps
MRender 74.9
Gravity 67.2
Splatting 58.1
54% 66.7 fps
Poor: 43%
This bench: 57.2%
Great: 54%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Samsung 850 Evo 250GB-$100
165GB free (System drive)
Firmware: EMT02B6Q Max speed: SATA 3.0 600 MB/s
Performing way below expectations (14th percentile)
86.7% Excellent
Read 517
Write 413
Mixed 420
100% 450 MB/s
4K Read 33.4
4K Write 57
4K Mixed 33.6
124% 41.3 MB/s
DQ Read 37.8
DQ Write 83.2
DQ Mixed 21.5
28% 47.5 MB/s
Poor: 72%
This bench: 86.7%
Great: 124%
OCZ VERTEX3 90GB
2GB free
Firmware: 2.25 Max speed: SATA 3.0 600 MB/s
Performing way below expectations (5th percentile)
49.9% Average
Read 496
Write 113
Mixed 135
53% 248 MB/s
4K Read 15.5
4K Write 58.6
4K Mixed 9.4
67% 27.9 MB/s
DQ Read 88.2
DQ Write 89.2
DQ Mixed 32.3
40% 69.9 MB/s
Poor: 50%
This bench: 49.9%
Great: 77%
WD Blue 500GB (2010)-$23
14GB free
Firmware: 18.01H18 Max speed: SATA 3.0 600 MB/s
Performing as expected (44th percentile)
52.3% Above average
Read 94.8
Write 87.2
Mixed 109
74% 96.9 MB/s
4K Read 0.44
4K Write 1.85
4K Mixed 0.31
88% 0.87 MB/s
Poor: 24%
This bench: 52.3%
Great: 69%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Crucial BLS4G4D240FSA.8FADG 3x4GB
3 of 8 slots used
12GB DIMM DDR4 clocked @ 2400 MHz
Performing way above expectations (87th percentile)
86.1% Excellent
MC Read 37.5
MC Write 29.9
MC Mixed 29.7
92% 32.4 GB/s
SC Read 14.6
SC Write 19.1
SC Mixed 20
51% 17.9 GB/s
Latency 64
62% 64 ns
Poor: 46%
This bench: 86.1%
Great: 87%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Typical X99 Extreme4 Builds (Compare 820 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 82%
Aircraft carrier
Desktop
Desktop 82%
Aircraft carrier
Workstation
Workstation 73%
Battleship

Motherboard: Asrock X99 Extreme4 - $261

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 89% - Excellent Total price: $777
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate thousands of reddit accounts. Our benchmarks expose their spiel so they attack our reputation.
Why don’t PC brands endorse UserBenchmark?
Brands make boatloads on flagships like the 4090 and 14900KS. We help users get similar real-world performance for less money.
Why don’t youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't pay youtubers, so they don't praise us. Moreover, our data exposes youtubers that promote overpriced/inferior products.
Why does UserBenchmark have negative trustpilot reviews?
The 200+ trustpilot reviews are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users don't give a monkey's about big brands.
Why is UserBenchmark popular with users?
Instead of pursuing brands for sponsorship, we've spent 13 years publishing real-world data for users.
The Best
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12400F $110Nvidia RTX 4060 $290WD Black SN850X M.2 2TB $145
Intel Core i5-12600K $174Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385WD Black SN850X M.2 1TB $89
Intel Core i5-13600K $260Nvidia RTX 4070 $549WD Black SN850X M.2 4TB $293
Today's hottest deals
If you buy something via a price link, UserBenchmark may earn a commission
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback