ADD TO PC
BUILD

Dell OptiPlex GX520

Performance Results

Benchmarks - missing GPU
Gaming 0% Incomplete	Desktop 0% Incomplete	Workstation 0% Incomplete


PC Status	Overall this PC is performing as expected (60th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 40 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
Processor	With a relatively low single core score, this CPU can handle email, light web browsing and basic audio/video playback, but it will struggle to handle CPU intensive tasks. Finally, with a gaming score of 35.6%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is poor.
Boot Drive	The boot partition is located on a mechanical or hybrid drive. Moving the system to an SSD will yield far faster boot times, better system responsiveness and faster application load times.
Memory	4GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and although it's sufficient for most games, some will benefit from up to 8GB of RAM. 4GB is also enough for modest file and system caches which allow for a responsive system.
OS Version	Although Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.

Run History

4 years ago, 4 years ago, 4 years ago, 4 years ago, 4 years ago, 4 years ago, 3 years ago, 3 years ago, 3 years ago, 3 years ago, 3 years ago, 3 years ago, 3 years ago, 3 years ago, 3 years ago, 3 years ago, 3 years ago, 3 years ago, 3 years ago, 3 years ago, 3 years ago, 3 years ago, 3 years ago, 3 years ago, 3 years ago, 3 years ago, 3 years ago, 3 years ago, 3 years ago, 3 years ago, 3 years ago. (Only the first run influences device rankings)

System	Dell OptiPlex GX520
Motherboard	Dell OptiPlex GX520 (all builds)
Memory	1.4 GB free of 4 GB @ 0.5 GHz
Display	1440 x 900 - 32 Bit colors,
OS	Windows 10
BIOS Date	20061130
Uptime	0 Days
Run Date	Jul 30 '20 at 17:12
Run Duration	170 Seconds
Run User	USA-User
Background CPU	5%

PC Performing as expected (60^th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor	Bench	Normal	Heavy	Server
Intel Pentium 4 3.20GHz 3,160 User benchmarks, average bench 30% Microprocessor, 1 CPU, 1 cores, 2 threads Base clock 3.2 GHz, turbo 3.2 GHz (avg) Performing way above expectations (94^th percentile)	35.6% Below average	Memory 65.7 1-Core 26.1 2-Core 35.9 32% 42.6 Pts	4-Core 36.2 8-Core 36 5% 36.1 Pts	64-Core 35.5 2% 35.5 Pts
Poor: 17% ↑ This bench: 35.6% Great: 36%

Drives	Bench	Sequential	Random 4k	Deep queue 4k
4GB ATA Flash Disk 4GB 13 User benchmarks, average bench 3% 2GB free Firmware: AD B61FK SusWrite @10s intervals: 16 17 17 17 17 16 MB/s Performing above expectations (79^th percentile)	3.98% Terrible	Read 23.5 Write 16.2 Mixed 13.2 SusWrite 16.6 4% 17.4 MB/s	4K Read 4.8 4K Write 0.1 4K Mixed 0.2 8% 1.7 MB/s
Poor: 1% ↑ This bench: 3.98% Great: 5%
Seagate ST3160318AS 160GB-$43 15,932 User benchmarks, average bench 41% 24GB free (System drive) Firmware: HP34 SusWrite @10s intervals: 94 93 91 95 94 90 MB/s Performing way above expectations (89^th percentile)	54.6% Above average	Read 97.3 Write 96.4 Mixed 50 SusWrite 92.8 62% 84.1 MB/s	4K Read 0.7 4K Write 1.8 4K Mixed 0.6 129% 1.03 MB/s
Poor: 14% ↑ This bench: 54.6% Great: 58%
Adata S102 Pro USB 3.0 16GB-$22 1,656 User benchmarks, average bench 17% 4GB free, PID 312b Operating at USB 2.1 Speed SusWrite @10s intervals: 11 8 8.3 10 1.6 8.8 MB/s Performing way below expectations (15^th percentile)	8.87% Terrible	Read 31.9 Write 5.3 Mixed 14.9 SusWrite 8 17% 15 MB/s	4K Read 2.8 4K Write 0.6 4K Mixed 0.8 58% 1.4 MB/s
Poor: 8% ↑ This bench: 8.87% Great: 27%
SanDisk Cruzer Blade 8GB 30,139 User benchmarks, average bench 10% 5GB free, PID 5567 Operating at USB 2.1 Speed SusWrite @10s intervals: 2.8 4.5 4.7 4.5 4.7 4.7 MB/s Performing as expected (53^rd percentile)	10.2% Very poor	Read 32 Write 4 Mixed 7.5 SusWrite 4.3 12% 11.9 MB/s	4K Read 3.8 4K Write 1.2 4K Mixed 1.7 113% 2.23 MB/s
Poor: 6% ↑ This bench: 10.2% Great: 13%

Memory Kit	Bench	Multi core	Single core	Latency
Unknown 2x2GB 446,702 User benchmarks, average bench 20% 2 of 2 slots used 4GB DIMM DDR Performing below potential (28^th percentile) - ensure that a dual+ channel XMP BIOS profile is enabled: How to enable XMP	13.7% Very poor	MC Read 4.9 MC Write 3.8 MC Mixed 3.7 12% 4.13 GB/s	SC Read 3.5 SC Write 4.3 SC Mixed 2.9 10% 3.57 GB/s	Latency 112 36% 112 ns
Poor: 10% ↑ This bench: 13.7% Great: 44%

Take a copy of your results How to check your in-game FPS

System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Custom PC Builder (Explore upgrades for this PC) Build your perfect PC: compare component prices, popularity, speed and value for money

CHOOSE AN UPGRADE:

CPU

GPU

SSD

HDD

RAM

Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?

Marketers operate thousands of reddit accounts. Our benchmarks expose their spiel so they attack our reputation.

Why don’t PC brands endorse UserBenchmark?

Brands make boatloads on flagships like the 4090 and 14900KS. We help users get similar real-world performance for less money.

Why don’t youtubers promote UserBenchmark?

We don't pay youtubers, so they don't praise us. Moreover, our data obstructs youtubers who promote overpriced or inferior products.

Why does UserBenchmark have negative trustpilot reviews?

The 200+ trustpilot reviews are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users don't give a monkey's about big brands.

Why is UserBenchmark popular with users?

Instead of pursuing brands for sponsorship, we've spent 13 years publishing real-world data for users.

The Best

CPU	GPU	SSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $164	Nvidia RTX 4060 $293	WD Black SN850X M.2 2TB $149
Intel Core i5-12400F $110	Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385	WD Black SN850X M.2 1TB $89
Intel Core i5-13600K $249	Nvidia RTX 4070 $549	Crucial T700 M.2 4TB $359

Today's hottest

Amazon Ebay

deals

CPU GPU SSD HDD USB RAM MBD

If you buy something via a price link, UserBenchmark may earn a commission

Build

Test

EFps

Can You Run It?

►
YouTube
*NEW*

About • User Guide • FAQs • Email • Privacy • Developer • YouTube Feedback