Dell OptiPlex GX520

Performance Results

Benchmarks - missing GPU
Gaming
Gaming 0%
Incomplete
Desktop
Desktop 0%
Incomplete
Workstation
Workstation 0%
Incomplete
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing below expectations (37th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 63 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components. Use the charts in the benchmark sections of this report to identify problem areas.
ProcessorWith a relatively low single core score, this CPU can handle email, light web browsing and basic audio/video playback, but it will struggle to handle CPU intensive tasks. Finally, with a gaming score of 30.6%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is poor.
Boot DriveThe boot partition is located on a mechanical or hybrid drive. Moving the system to an SSD will yield far faster boot times, better system responsiveness and faster application load times.
Memory4GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and although it's sufficient for most games, some will benefit from up to 8GB of RAM. 4GB is also enough for modest file and system caches which allow for a responsive system.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.
High background CPU (26%). High background CPU reduces benchmark accuracy. How to reduce background CPU.
Run History
SystemDell OptiPlex GX520
MotherboardDell OptiPlex GX520  (all builds)
Memory1.9 GB free of 4 GB @ 0.5 GHz
Display1440 x 900 - 32 Bit colors,
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20061130
Uptime0.1 Days
Run DateJan 25 '20 at 22:50
Run Duration195 Seconds
Run User USA-User
Background CPU 26%

 PC Performing below expectations (37th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
Intel Pentium 4 3.20GHz
Microprocessor, 1 CPU, 1 cores, 2 threads
Base clock 3.2 GHz, turbo 3.2 GHz (avg)
Performing as expected (52nd percentile)
30.6% Below average
Memory 57.2
1-Core 21.1
2-Core 24.2
27% 34.2 Pts
4-Core 25.6
8-Core 29.4
4% 27.5 Pts
64-Core 28.2
2% 28.2 Pts
Poor: 17%
This bench: 30.6%
Great: 36%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
4GB ATA Flash Disk 4GB
4GB free
Firmware: AD B61FK
SusWrite @10s intervals: 11 12 13 14 16 13 MB/s
Performing above expectations (75th percentile)
2.97% Terrible
Read 22.4
Write 11.7
Mixed 9.2
SusWrite 13.1
3% 14.1 MB/s
4K Read 2.9
4K Write 0.1
4K Mixed 0.2
5% 1.07 MB/s
Poor: 1%
This bench: 2.97%
Great: 5%
Seagate ST3160318AS 160GB-$43
48GB free (System drive)
Firmware: HP34
SusWrite @10s intervals: 70 86 81 84 82 89 MB/s
Performing above expectations (62nd percentile)
45.9% Average
Read 78
Write 82.5
Mixed 45.3
SusWrite 81.9
53% 71.9 MB/s
4K Read 0.5
4K Write 1.7
4K Mixed 0.9
152% 1.03 MB/s
Poor: 14%
This bench: 45.9%
Great: 58%
Adata S102 Pro USB 3.0 16GB-$22
10GB free, PID 312b
Operating at USB 2.1 Speed
SusWrite @10s intervals: 11 8.4 8.6 9.6 9.6 8.3 MB/s
Performing way below expectations (15th percentile)
8.65% Terrible
Read 29.7
Write 18.2
Mixed 13.7
SusWrite 9.2
21% 17.7 MB/s
4K Read 2.1
4K Write 0.6
4K Mixed 0.2
35% 0.97 MB/s
Poor: 8%
This bench: 8.65%
Great: 27%
USB Disk 0GB
0GB free, PID 3234
Operating at USB 2.0 Speed
SusWrite @10s intervals: 0.9 0.9 1 0.9 1 0.9 MB/s
Performing way below expectations (3rd percentile)
0.7% Terrible
Read 0.7
Write 0.7
Mixed 0.8
SusWrite 0.9
1% 0.77 MB/s
4K Read 0.4
4K Write 0.1
4K Mixed 0.1
8% 0.2 MB/s
Poor: 1%
This bench: 0.7%
Great: 6%
Lexar USB Flash Drive 4GB
1GB free, PID a764
Operating at USB 2.0 Speed
SusWrite @10s intervals: 6.8 7 7.1 7 7 6.8 MB/s
Performing as expected (43rd percentile)
4.96% Terrible
Read 16.5
Write 5.5
Mixed 5.3
SusWrite 6.9
10% 8.55 MB/s
4K Read 4.5
4K Write 0
4K Mixed 0
17% 1.5 MB/s
Poor: 4%
This bench: 4.96%
Great: 7%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Unknown 2x2GB
2 of 2 slots used
4GB DIMM DDR
Performing below potential (5th percentile) - ensure that a dual+ channel XMP BIOS profile is enabled: How to enable XMP
9.02% Terrible
MC Read 3.4
MC Write 2.7
MC Mixed 2.2
8% 2.77 GB/s
SC Read 0.4
SC Write 2.4
SC Mixed 0.9
4% 1.23 GB/s
Latency 136
29% 136 ns
Poor: 10%
This bench: 9.02%
Great: 44%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate thousands of reddit accounts. Our benchmarks expose their spiel so they attack our reputation.
Why don’t PC brands endorse UserBenchmark?
Brands make boatloads on flagships like the 4090 and 14900KS. We help users get similar real-world performance for less money.
Why don’t youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't pay youtubers, so they don't praise us. Moreover, our data obstructs youtubers who promote overpriced or inferior products.
Why does UserBenchmark have negative trustpilot reviews?
The 200+ trustpilot reviews are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users don't give a monkey's about big brands.
Why is UserBenchmark popular with users?
Instead of pursuing brands for sponsorship, we've spent 13 years publishing real-world data for users.
The Best
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $164Nvidia RTX 4060 $293WD Black SN850X M.2 2TB $149
Intel Core i5-12400F $110Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385WD Black SN850X M.2 1TB $89
Intel Core i5-13600K $249Nvidia RTX 4070 $549Crucial T700 M.2 4TB $359
Today's hottest deals
If you buy something via a price link, UserBenchmark may earn a commission
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback