Dell OptiPlex GX520

Performance Results

Benchmarks - missing GPU
Gaming
Gaming 0%
Incomplete
Desktop
Desktop 0%
Incomplete
Workstation
Workstation 0%
Incomplete
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing above expectations (61st percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 39 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
ProcessorWith a relatively low single core score, this CPU can handle email, light web browsing and basic audio/video playback, but it will struggle to handle CPU intensive tasks. Finally, with a gaming score of 36.8%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is poor.
Boot DriveThe boot partition is located on a mechanical or hybrid drive. Moving the system to an SSD will yield far faster boot times, better system responsiveness and faster application load times.
Memory4GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and although it's sufficient for most games, some will benefit from up to 8GB of RAM. 4GB is also enough for modest file and system caches which allow for a responsive system.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.
Run History
SystemDell OptiPlex GX520
MotherboardDell OptiPlex GX520  (all builds)
Memory1.9 GB free of 4 GB @ 0.5 GHz
Display1440 x 900 - 32 Bit colors,
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20061130
Uptime0.1 Days
Run DateJul 16 '20 at 23:20
Run Duration165 Seconds
Run User USA-User
Background CPU5%

 PC Performing above expectations (61st percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
Intel Pentium 4 3.20GHz
Microprocessor, 1 CPU, 1 cores, 2 threads
Base clock 3.2 GHz, turbo 3.2 GHz (avg)
Performing way above expectations (97th percentile)
36.8% Below average
Memory 68.1
1-Core 22.4
2-Core 33.8
32% 41.4 Pts
4-Core 35.8
8-Core 33.8
5% 34.8 Pts
64-Core 35.8
2% 35.8 Pts
Poor: 17%
This bench: 36.8%
Great: 36%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
4GB ATA Flash Disk 4GB
2GB free
Firmware: AD B61FK
SusWrite @10s intervals: 16 17 17 17 17 17 MB/s
Performing above expectations (79th percentile)
4.15% Terrible
Read 23.4
Write 15.5
Mixed 19.5
SusWrite 16.8
4% 18.8 MB/s
4K Read 5.2
4K Write 0.1
4K Mixed 0.2
8% 1.83 MB/s
Poor: 1%
This bench: 4.15%
Great: 5%
Seagate ST3160318AS 160GB-$43
20GB free (System drive)
Firmware: HP34
SusWrite @10s intervals: 79 90 90 94 95 94 MB/s
Performing above expectations (81st percentile)
51.6% Above average
Read 89.1
Write 91.8
Mixed 51.2
SusWrite 90.5
59% 80.6 MB/s
4K Read 0.7
4K Write 1.8
4K Mixed 1.1
185% 1.2 MB/s
Poor: 14%
This bench: 51.6%
Great: 58%
Adata S102 Pro USB 3.0 16GB-$22
4GB free, PID 312b
Operating at USB 2.1 Speed
SusWrite @10s intervals: 2.8 3.9 6.6 9.4 9.4 13 MB/s
Performing way below expectations (15th percentile)
9.14% Terrible
Read 32.5
Write 6.2
Mixed 22.9
SusWrite 7.4
20% 17.2 MB/s
4K Read 2.8
4K Write 0.7
4K Mixed 1.1
72% 1.53 MB/s
Poor: 8%
This bench: 9.14%
Great: 27%
SanDisk Cruzer Blade 8GB
5GB free, PID 5567
Operating at USB 2.1 Speed
SusWrite @10s intervals: 3 4.5 4.6 4.7 4.7 4.7 MB/s
Performing above expectations (71st percentile)
11.4% Very poor
Read 31.8
Write 5.2
Mixed 6.7
SusWrite 4.4
12% 12 MB/s
4K Read 3.8
4K Write 1.6
4K Mixed 2.6
157% 2.67 MB/s
Poor: 6%
This bench: 11.4%
Great: 13%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Unknown 2x2GB
2 of 2 slots used
4GB DIMM DDR
Performing below potential (22nd percentile) - ensure that a dual+ channel XMP BIOS profile is enabled: How to enable XMP
12.9% Very poor
MC Read 4.5
MC Write 3.7
MC Mixed 3.6
11% 3.93 GB/s
SC Read 2.6
SC Write 3.6
SC Mixed 1.6
7% 2.6 GB/s
Latency 106
38% 106 ns
Poor: 10%
This bench: 12.9%
Great: 44%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate thousands of reddit accounts. Our benchmarks expose their spiel so they attack our reputation.
Why don’t PC brands endorse UserBenchmark?
Brands make boatloads on flagships like the 4090 and 14900KS. We help users get similar real-world performance for less money.
Why don’t youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't pay youtubers, so they don't praise us. Moreover, our data obstructs youtubers who promote overpriced or inferior products.
Why does UserBenchmark have negative trustpilot reviews?
The 200+ trustpilot reviews are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users don't give a monkey's about big brands.
Why is UserBenchmark popular with users?
Instead of pursuing brands for sponsorship, we've spent 13 years publishing real-world data for users.
The Best
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $164Nvidia RTX 4060 $293WD Black SN850X M.2 2TB $149
Intel Core i5-12400F $110Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385WD Black SN850X M.2 1TB $89
Intel Core i5-13600K $249Nvidia RTX 4070 $549Crucial T700 M.2 4TB $359
Today's hottest deals
If you buy something via a price link, UserBenchmark may earn a commission
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback