Performance Results

Benchmarks - missing GPU, SSD
Gaming 0% Incomplete	Desktop 0% Incomplete	Workstation 0% Incomplete


PC Status	Overall this PC is performing way below expectations (16th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 84 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components. Use the charts in the benchmark sections of this report to identify problem areas.
Processor	With an extremely low single core score, this CPU can barely handle email and light web browsing. Finally, with a gaming score of 16%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is terrible.
Boot Drive	The boot partition is located on a mechanical or hybrid drive. Moving the system to an SSD will yield far faster boot times, better system responsiveness and faster application load times.
Memory	4GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and although it's sufficient for most games, some will benefit from up to 8GB of RAM. 4GB is also enough for modest file and system caches which allow for a responsive system.
OS Version	Although Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.

Very high background CPU (32%). High background CPU reduces benchmark accuracy. How to reduce background CPU.

PC Performing way below expectations (16^th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor	Bench	Normal	Heavy	Server
Intel Pentium 4 3.20GHz 3,160 User benchmarks, average bench 30% Microprocessor, 1 CPU, 1 cores, 2 threads Base clock 3.2 GHz, turbo 3.2 GHz (avg) Performing way below expectations (5^th percentile)	16% Very poor	Memory 28.1 1-Core 23.4 2-Core 23.4 17% 25 Pts	4-Core 24.8 8-Core 22.4 3% 23.6 Pts	64-Core 28 2% 28 Pts
Poor: 17% ↑ This bench: 16% Great: 36%

Drives	Bench	Sequential	Random 4k
Seagate ST3160318AS 160GB-$43 15,932 User benchmarks, average bench 41% 55GB free (System drive) Firmware: HP34 SusWrite @10s intervals: 68 82 87 87 87 88 MB/s Performing way below expectations (20^th percentile)	30.2% Below average	Read 21.7 Write 19.3 Mixed 18.7 SusWrite 83.1 26% 35.7 MB/s	4K Read 0.4 4K Write 1.5 4K Mixed 0.8 133% 0.9 MB/s
Poor: 14% ↑ This bench: 30.2% Great: 58%
USB Disk 0GB 70 User benchmarks, average bench 4% 0GB free, PID 3234 Operating at USB 2.0 Speed SusWrite @10s intervals: 0.9 0.9 1 0.9 1 0.9 MB/s Performing way below expectations (7^th percentile)	0.71% Terrible	Read 0.8 Write 0.7 Mixed 0.8 SusWrite 0.9 1% 0.8 MB/s	4K Read 0.4 4K Write 0.1 4K Mixed 0.1 8% 0.2 MB/s
Poor: 1% ↑ This bench: 0.71% Great: 6%
Lexar USB Flash Drive 4GB 119 User benchmarks, average bench 6% 1GB free, PID a764 Operating at USB 2.0 Speed SusWrite @10s intervals: 6.4 7.1 7.1 7.1 6.9 6.9 MB/s Performing as expected (43^rd percentile)	5.01% Terrible	Read 16.7 Write 5.7 Mixed 5.2 SusWrite 6.9 10% 8.63 MB/s	4K Read 4.6 4K Write 0 4K Mixed 0 17% 1.53 MB/s
Poor: 4% ↑ This bench: 5.01% Great: 7%

Memory Kit	Bench	Multi core	Single core	Latency
Unknown 2x2GB 446,702 User benchmarks, average bench 20% 2 of 2 slots used 4GB DIMM DDR Performing way below expectations (4^th percentile)	8.44% Terrible	MC Read 3.6 MC Write 2.4 MC Mixed 2.4 8% 2.8 GB/s	SC Read 2.3 SC Write 2.1 SC Mixed 1.9 6% 2.1 GB/s	Latency 266 15% 266 ns
Poor: 10% ↑ This bench: 8.44% Great: 44%

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

CPU

GPU

SSD

HDD

RAM