HP Z220 SFF Workstation

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 17%
Surfboard
Desktop
Desktop 75%
Battleship
Workstation
Workstation 14%
Tree trunk
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing as expected (44th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 56 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
ProcessorWith a good single core score, this CPU can easily handle the majority of general computing tasks. Additionally this processor can handle very light workstation, and even some very light server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 71.6%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is good.
Graphics16.7% is a below average 3D score (RTX 2060S = 100%). This GPU can handle older games but it will struggle to render recent games at resolutions greater than 1080p. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Boot Drive30.7% is low SSD score. With a better SSD this system will boot faster, make applications more responsive and reduce IO wait times.
Memory16GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's more than sufficient for nearly all games. 16GB also allows for very large file and system caches, software development and batch photo editing/processing.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.
Sub-optimal background CPU (12%). High background CPU reduces benchmark accuracy. How to reduce background CPU.
SystemHP Z220 SFF Workstation  (all builds)
MotherboardHewlett-Packard 1791
Memory7.8 GB free of 16 GB @ 1.6 GHz
Display4096 x 2160 - 32 Bit colors
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20120503
Uptime0.8 Days
Run DateJul 30 '20 at 09:30
Run Duration201 Seconds
Run User AUS-User
Background CPU 12%

 PC Performing as expected (44th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
Intel Core i7-3770-$297
SOCKET 0, 1 CPU, 4 cores, 8 threads
Base clock 3.4 GHz, turbo 3.7 GHz (avg)
Performing above expectations (78th percentile)
71.6% Very good
Memory 86.3
1-Core 101
2-Core 178
72% 122 Pts
4-Core 308
8-Core 493
49% 401 Pts
64-Core 490
30% 490 Pts
Poor: 57%
This bench: 71.6%
Great: 76%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
Nvidia Quadro P620
Nvidia(10DE 1264) 2GB
CLim: 1354 MHz, MLim: 1252 MHz, Ram: 2GB, Driver: 442.92
Performing way below expectations (19th percentile)
16.7% Very poor
Lighting 24.1
Reflection 22.2
Parallax 19.8
20% 22 fps
MRender 25
Gravity 21
Splatting 0.09
11% 15.4 fps
Poor: 17%
This bench: 16.7%
Great: 19%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Kingston A400 480GB-$38
183GB free (System drive)
Firmware: SBFK71B1
SusWrite @10s intervals: 262 20 44 60 14 5.8 MB/s
Performing below potential (1st percentile) - Ensure that this drive is connected to a SATA 3.0 port with a SATA 3.0 cable
30.7% Below average
Read 144
Write 97.5
Mixed 274
SusWrite 67.6
33% 146 MB/s
4K Read 19.7
4K Write 14
4K Mixed 14.8
56% 16.2 MB/s
DQ Read 152
DQ Write 13.8
DQ Mixed 25.6
33% 64 MB/s
Poor: 39%
This bench: 30.7%
Great: 102%
WD Blue 1TB (2012)-$29
546GB free
Firmware: 01.01A01
SusWrite @10s intervals: 148 150 143 150 154 154 MB/s
Performing as expected (52nd percentile)
84.8% Excellent
Read 145
Write 151
Mixed 84.2
SusWrite 150
97% 133 MB/s
4K Read 1.1
4K Write 2.9
4K Mixed 1.2
233% 1.73 MB/s
Poor: 52%
This bench: 84.8%
Great: 109%
Hitachi HUA722020ALA330 2TB
2TB free
Firmware: JKAOA3FB
SusWrite @10s intervals: 119 119 115 121 121 120 MB/s
Performing above expectations (84th percentile)
67.3% Good
Read 116
Write 118
Mixed 57.7
SusWrite 119
75% 103 MB/s
4K Read 0.7
4K Write 1.5
4K Mixed 0.8
146% 1 MB/s
Poor: 39%
This bench: 67.3%
Great: 70%
Multiple Flash Reader 1GB
1GB free, PID 6361
Operating at USB 2.0 Speed
SusWrite @10s intervals: 0.5 0.5 0.5 0.5 0.5 0.5 MB/s
Performing way below expectations (5th percentile)
0.37% Terrible
Read 0.8
Write 0.8
Mixed 0.5
SusWrite 0.5
1% 0.65 MB/s
4K Read 0.6
4K Write 0
4K Mixed 0
2% 0.2 MB/s
Poor: 0%
This bench: 0.37%
Great: 5%
AXXEN SKY XM 2GB
2GB free, PID 1603
Operating at USB 2.0 Speed
SusWrite @10s intervals: 0.5 0.5 0.5 0.5 0.5 0.5 MB/s
Relative performance n/a - insufficient samples
0.7% Terrible
Read 0.8
Write 0.7
Mixed 0.5
SusWrite 0.5
1% 0.62 MB/s
4K Read 0.7
4K Write 0.1
4K Mixed 0.1
9% 0.3 MB/s
Poor: 1%
This bench: 0.7%
Great: 6%
HP v125w 2GB
1GB free, PID 3307
Operating at USB 2.0 Speed
SusWrite @10s intervals: 3.1 3.2 3.4 3.2 3.4 3.2 MB/s
Performing below expectations (29th percentile)
4.13% Terrible
Read 12.8
Write 1
Mixed 1.8
SusWrite 3.2
4% 4.7 MB/s
4K Read 6.7
4K Write 0
4K Mixed 0
25% 2.23 MB/s
Poor: 3%
This bench: 4.13%
Great: 8%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Micron 16KTF51264AZ-1G6M1 16JTF51264AZ-1G6M1 16KTF51264AZ-1G6M1 16JTF51264AZ-1G6M1 16GB
1600, 1600, 1600, 1600 MHz
4096, 4096, 4096, 4096 MB
Performing way above expectations (86th percentile)
52.3% Above average
MC Read 20.6
MC Write 19.3
MC Mixed 15.9
53% 18.6 GB/s
SC Read 9.8
SC Write 17.4
SC Mixed 11.8
37% 13 GB/s
Latency 71
56% 71 ns
Poor: 34%
This bench: 52.3%
Great: 56%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Typical Z220 SFF Workstation Builds (Compare 383 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 7%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 62%
Destroyer
Workstation
Workstation 7%
Tree trunk

System: HP Z220 SFF Workstation

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 64% - Good Total price: $325
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate countless reddit accounts. UserBenchmark’s data exposes their marketing spiel so they systematically attack our reputation.
Why don’t large PC brands support UserBenchmark?
PC brands profit greatly from flagship hardware like the 4090, 14900KS, and 7950X3D. We help users get similar real-world performance for less money.
Why don’t any youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't sponsor youtubers, so they have no incentive to praise us. Moreover, brands pay more to market weaker products which puts their youtubers at odds with UserBenchmark.
Why does UserBenchmark have so many negative trustpilot reviews?
Trustpilot hosts user-generated online reviews. It's obvious that the 200+ UserBenchmark reviews, are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users aren't interested in promoting billon-dollar brands...
Why is UserBenchmark so popular with users?
Instead of pursuing lucrative sponsorships with billion-dollar PC brands, we have dedicated 13 years to publishing accurate real-world data. As a result, our users save millions every year and they return repeatedly.
The Best.
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $170Nvidia RTX 4060 $293Crucial MX500 250GB $39
Intel Core i5-12400F $122Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-13600K $260Nvidia RTX 4070 $550Samsung 870 Evo 250GB $45
HDDRAMUSB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $37Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $40SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $29Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $48SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $62G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16
If you make a purchase via one of these links, our site may earn a commission
Today's hottest deals
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback