MSI MAG Z390 TOMAHAWK (MS-7B18)

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 130%
UFO
Desktop
Desktop 105%
UFO
Workstation
Workstation 134%
UFO
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing above expectations (74th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 26 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
ProcessorWith an outstanding single core score, this CPU is the cat's whiskers: It demolishes everyday tasks such as web browsing, office apps and audio/video playback. Additionally this processor can handle intensive workstation, and even full-fledged server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 103%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is outstanding.
Graphics125% is an outstanding 3D score, it's the bee's knees. This GPU can handle almost all 3D games at very high resolutions and ultra detail levels.
Boot Drive306% is an exceptional SSD score. This drive is suitable for heavy workstation use, it will facilitate fast boots, responsive applications and allow for fast transfers of multi-gigabyte files.
Memory32GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's far more than any current game requires. 32GB will also allow for large file and system caches, virtual machine hosting, software development, video editing and batch multimedia processing.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.
Run History
3 years ago, 3 years ago.
SystemMicro-Star MS-7B18
MotherboardMSI MAG Z390 TOMAHAWK (MS-7B18)  (all builds)
Memory27.1 GB free of 32 GB @ 2.7 GHz
Display2560 x 1080 - 32 Bit colors
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20181114
Uptime0 Days
Run DateJul 30 '20 at 00:58
Run Duration379 Seconds
Run User USA-User
Background CPU2%
Watch Gameplay: 2080 + 9600K How to compare your gameplay

 PC Performing above expectations (74th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
Intel Core i9-9900K-$405
U3E1, 1 CPU, 8 cores, 16 threads
Base clock 3.6 GHz, turbo 4.7 GHz (avg)
Performing way above expectations (92nd percentile)
103% Outstanding
Memory 93.7
1-Core 154
2-Core 301
100% 183 Pts
4-Core 599
8-Core 1,173
105% 886 Pts
64-Core 1,656
102% 1,656 Pts
Poor: 89%
This bench: 103%
Great: 104%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
Nvidia RTX 2080-$270
MSI(1462 3722) ≥ 4GB
CLim: 2100 MHz, MLim: 3500 MHz, Ram: 8GB, Driver: 441.66
Performing below potential (58th percentile) - GPU OC Guide
125% Outstanding
Lighting 170
Reflection 162
Parallax 162
138% 165 fps
MRender 191
Gravity 149
Splatting 107
117% 149 fps
Poor: 109%
This bench: 125%
Great: 134%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Samsung 970 Evo Plus NVMe PCIe M.2 500GB-$55
191GB free (System drive)
Firmware: 1B2QEXM7 Max speed: PCIe 16,000 MB/s
SusWrite @10s intervals: 1098 851 827 815 810 808 MB/s
Performing above expectations (78th percentile)
306% Outstanding
Read 2,606
Write 2,402
Mixed 1,467
SusWrite 868
410% 1,836 MB/s
4K Read 65.7
4K Write 161
4K Mixed 90.3
300% 106 MB/s
DQ Read 1,456
DQ Write 1,042
DQ Mixed 1,209
914% 1,236 MB/s
Poor: 178%
This bench: 306%
Great: 346%
Samsung 860 Evo 500GB-$80
16GB free
Firmware: RVT01B6Q
Relative performance n/a - sequential test incomplete
Read 515
Write 483
Mixed 459
108% 486 MB/s
4K Read 42.2
4K Write 96.3
4K Mixed 54.9
185% 64.5 MB/s
DQ Read 377
DQ Write 337
DQ Mixed 352
266% 355 MB/s
Poor: 74% Great: 129%
Samsung 860 Evo 500GB-$80
27GB free
Firmware: RVT01B6Q
Relative performance n/a - sequential test incomplete
Read 514
Write 488
Mixed 452
108% 485 MB/s
4K Read 42
4K Write 96.4
4K Mixed 54.4
184% 64.3 MB/s
DQ Read 378
DQ Write 337
DQ Mixed 354
266% 357 MB/s
Poor: 74% Great: 129%
Adata Ultimate SU800 2TB-$668
1.5TB free
Firmware: R0427A
SusWrite @10s intervals: 478 479 479 479 478 479 MB/s
Performing above expectations (81st percentile)
119% Outstanding
Read 516
Write 469
Mixed 384
SusWrite 479
104% 462 MB/s
4K Read 36.4
4K Write 93.4
4K Mixed 50.8
170% 60.2 MB/s
DQ Read 381
DQ Write 341
DQ Mixed 302
242% 341 MB/s
Poor: 78%
This bench: 119%
Great: 127%
Seagate Barracuda 8TB (2017)-$79
4TB free
Firmware: 0001
SusWrite @10s intervals: 138 141 140 144 150 141 MB/s
Performing below expectations (31st percentile)
63.2% Good
Read 76.5
Write 116
Mixed 69.2
SusWrite 142
74% 101 MB/s
4K Read 1.6
4K Write 4.7
4K Mixed 0.5
209% 2.27 MB/s
Poor: 39%
This bench: 63.2%
Great: 90%
External USB3.0 DISK04 14TB
7.5TB free, PID 0567
Operating at USB 3.0 Speed
SusWrite @10s intervals: 0 0 0 MB/s
Performing above expectations (80th percentile)
47.9% Average
Read 243
Write 251
Mixed 130
SusWrite 0
193% 156 MB/s
4K Read 6.8
4K Write 3.6
4K Mixed 2.7
240% 4.37 MB/s
Poor: 16%
This bench: 47.9%
Great: 77%
External USB3.0 DISK03 5TB
4TB free, PID 0567
Operating at USB 3.0 Speed
SusWrite @10s intervals: 0 0 0 0 0 0.1 MB/s
Relative performance n/a - insufficient samples
48.5% Average
Read 109
Write 102
Mixed 92.5
SusWrite 0
96% 76 MB/s
4K Read 0.6
4K Write 10.6
4K Mixed 0.7
387% 3.97 MB/s
DQ Read 0.3
DQ Write 10.8
DQ Mixed 0.8
396% 3.97 MB/s
Poor: 12%
This bench: 48.5%
Great: 49%
External USB3.0 DISK02 5TB
4TB free, PID 0567
Operating at USB 3.0 Speed
SusWrite @10s intervals: 168 131 131 132 137 163 MB/s
Performing way above expectations (95th percentile)
80% Very good
Read 104
Write 123
Mixed 81.8
SusWrite 143
157% 113 MB/s
4K Read 0.7
4K Write 10.9
4K Mixed 0.8
400% 4.13 MB/s
DQ Read 0.4
DQ Write 10.5
DQ Mixed 0.8
386% 3.9 MB/s
Poor: 13%
This bench: 80%
Great: 54%
External USB3.0 DISK01 5TB
4TB free, PID 0567
Operating at USB 3.0 Speed
SusWrite @10s intervals: 165 131 131 132 136 165 MB/s
Performing way above expectations (96th percentile)
83.2% Excellent
Read 151
Write 112
Mixed 95.5
SusWrite 143
166% 125 MB/s
4K Read 1.2
4K Write 9.7
4K Mixed 1
368% 3.97 MB/s
DQ Read 0.6
DQ Write 10.6
DQ Mixed 1
397% 4.07 MB/s
Poor: 23%
This bench: 83.2%
Great: 66%
External USB3.0 DISK00 8TB
1.5TB free, PID 0567
Operating at USB 3.0 Speed
Relative performance n/a - sequential test incomplete
Read 133
Write 140
Mixed 131
175% 135 MB/s
4K Read 7.9
4K Write 4.8
4K Mixed 0.7
216% 4.47 MB/s
Poor: 19% Great: 75%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Unknown DDR4 3000 4x8GB
4 of 4 slots used
32GB DIMM DDR4 clocked @ 2667 MHz
Performing as expected (59th percentile)
87.8% Excellent
MC Read 31.9
MC Write 34.2
MC Mixed 26.4
88% 30.8 GB/s
SC Read 19.7
SC Write 36.8
SC Mixed 27.7
80% 28.1 GB/s
Latency 60.5
66% 60.5 ns
Poor: 71%
This bench: 87.8%
Great: 101%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Typical MAG Z390 TOMAHAWK (MS-7B18) Builds (Compare 7,373 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 114%
UFO
Desktop
Desktop 100%
UFO
Workstation
Workstation 105%
UFO

Motherboard: MSI MAG Z390 TOMAHAWK (MS-7B18) - $135

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 111% - Outstanding Total price: $719
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate thousands of reddit accounts. Our benchmarks expose their spiel so they attack our reputation.
Why don’t PC brands endorse UserBenchmark?
Brands make boatloads on flagships like the 4090 and 14900KS. We help users get similar real-world performance for less money.
Why don’t youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't pay youtubers, so they don't praise us. Moreover, our data obstructs youtubers who promote overpriced or inferior products.
Why does UserBenchmark have negative trustpilot reviews?
The 200+ trustpilot reviews are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users don't give a monkey's about big brands.
Why is UserBenchmark popular with users?
Instead of pursuing brands for sponsorship, we've spent 13 years publishing real-world data for users.
The Best
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $169Nvidia RTX 4060 $293WD Black SN850X M.2 2TB $135
Intel Core i5-12400F $110Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385WD Black SN850X M.2 1TB $75
Intel Core i5-13600K $249Nvidia RTX 4070 $549Crucial T700 M.2 4TB $369
Today's hottest deals
If you buy something via a price link, UserBenchmark may earn a commission
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback