Asus PRIME Z690-P D4

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 85%
Aircraft carrier
Desktop
Desktop 84%
Aircraft carrier
Workstation
Workstation 85%
Aircraft carrier
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing above expectations (62nd percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 38 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
ProcessorWith a good single core score, this CPU can easily handle the majority of general computing tasks. Additionally this processor can handle moderate workstation, and even light server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 74%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is good.
Graphics109% is an outstanding 3D score, it's the bee's knees. This GPU can handle almost all 3D games at very high resolutions and ultra detail levels.
Boot Drive346% is an exceptional SSD score. This drive is suitable for heavy workstation use, it will facilitate fast boots, responsive applications and allow for fast transfers of multi-gigabyte files.
Memory32GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's far more than any current game requires. 32GB will also allow for large file and system caches, virtual machine hosting, software development, video editing and batch multimedia processing.
OS VersionWindows 11 is the most recent version of Windows.
Run History
MotherboardAsus PRIME Z690-P D4  (all builds)
Memory21.2 GB free of 32 GB @ 2.4 GHz
Display1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit colors
OSWindows 11
BIOS Date20220813
Uptime2.3 Days
Run DateSep 20 '23 at 13:10
Run Duration402 Seconds
Run User USA-User
Background CPU2%

 PC Performing above expectations (62nd percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
Intel Core i5-12600K-$174
LGA1700, 1 CPU, 10 cores, 16 threads
Base clock 3.7 GHz, turbo 2.8 GHz (avg)
Performing way below expectations (0th percentile)
74% Very good
Memory 69.7
1-Core 113
2-Core 226
75% 136 Pts
4-Core 420
8-Core 753
70% 586 Pts
64-Core 1,181
73% 1,181 Pts
Poor: 100%
This bench: 74%
Great: 117%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
AMD RX 6600-XT-$334
Ram: 8GB, Driver: 23.9.1
Performing way above expectations (87th percentile)
109% Outstanding
Lighting 116
Reflection 136
Parallax 240
94% 164 fps
MRender 216
Gravity 122
Splatting 184
143% 174 fps
Poor: 105%
This bench: 109%
Great: 110%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Samsung 970 Evo Plus NVMe PCIe M.2 2TB-$159
1.5TB free (System drive)
Firmware: 2B2QEXM7 Max speed: PCIe 16,000 MB/s
SusWrite @10s intervals: 2197 2087 2130 1906 1513 1500 MB/s
Performing as expected (58th percentile)
346% Outstanding
Read 2,208
Write 1,914
Mixed 1,523
SusWrite 1,889
423% 1,883 MB/s
4K Read 63.5
4K Write 171
4K Mixed 90
302% 108 MB/s
DQ Read 1,173
DQ Write 1,009
DQ Mixed 1,105
824% 1,096 MB/s
Poor: 223%
This bench: 346%
Great: 435%
Samsung 980 NVMe PCIe M.2 500GB-$68
465GB free
Firmware: 1B4QFXO7 Max speed: PCIe 16,000 MB/s
SusWrite @10s intervals: 1662 1984 1988 1987 1905 177 MB/s
Performing way above expectations (91st percentile)
277% Outstanding
Read 1,464
Write 1,755
Mixed 1,453
SusWrite 1,617
356% 1,572 MB/s
4K Read 48.2
4K Write 106
4K Mixed 66
214% 73.5 MB/s
DQ Read 1,312
DQ Write 1071
DQ Mixed 1,185
889% 1,189 MB/s
Poor: 144%
This bench: 277%
Great: 295%
WD My Passport 0740 750GB
661GB free, PID 0740
Operating at USB 3.0 Speed
SusWrite @10s intervals: 86 85 85 86 86 86 MB/s
Performing way above expectations (96th percentile)
35.2% Below average
Read 81.3
Write 82.3
Mixed 43.7
SusWrite 85.8
99% 73.3 MB/s
4K Read 0.4
4K Write 1.5
4K Mixed 0.5
70% 0.8 MB/s
Poor: 11%
This bench: 35.2%
Great: 35%
External USB3.0 DISK00 5TB
2.5TB free, PID 0567
Operating at USB 3.0 Speed
SusWrite @10s intervals: 0.9 0.8 0.4 0.2 0 MB/s
Performing as expected (58th percentile)
43.4% Average
Read 103
Write 154
Mixed 85.7
SusWrite 0.4
113% 85.6 MB/s
4K Read 0.5
4K Write 9.2
4K Mixed 0.7
339% 3.47 MB/s
DQ Read 0.4
DQ Write 10.1
DQ Mixed 0.8
372% 3.77 MB/s
Poor: 21%
This bench: 43.4%
Great: 51%
External USB3.0 DISK01 5TB
4TB free, PID 0567
Operating at USB 3.0 Speed
SusWrite @10s intervals: 102 101 102 103 103 102 MB/s
Performing way above expectations (92nd percentile)
65.6% Good
Read 89.8
Write 164
Mixed 93.6
SusWrite 102
160% 113 MB/s
4K Read 0.8
4K Write 9.8
4K Mixed 0.9
367% 3.83 MB/s
DQ Read 0.4
DQ Write 10.7
DQ Mixed 0.9
396% 4 MB/s
Poor: 23%
This bench: 65.6%
Great: 66%
External USB3.0 DISK02 750GB
602GB free, PID 0567
Operating at USB 3.0 Speed
SusWrite @10s intervals: 102 101 102 104 103 102 MB/s
Relative performance n/a - insufficient samples
45.4% Average
Read 107
Write 101
Mixed 74.8
SusWrite 102
130% 96.2 MB/s
4K Read 0.8
4K Write 2.4
4K Mixed 0.9
115% 1.37 MB/s
Poor: 20%
This bench: 45.4%
Great: 46%
External USB3.0 DISK03 320GB
289GB free, PID 0567
Operating at USB 3.0 Speed
SusWrite @10s intervals: 100 104 103 103 69 100 MB/s
Performing above expectations (80th percentile)
41.8% Average
Read 102
Write 100
Mixed 48.2
SusWrite 96.5
115% 86.6 MB/s
4K Read 0.6
4K Write 1.9
4K Mixed 0.8
94% 1.1 MB/s
Poor: 19%
This bench: 41.8%
Great: 42%
External USB3.0 DISK00 8TB
3.5TB free, PID null
SusWrite @10s intervals: 55 57 56 56 56 55 MB/s
Relative performance n/a - insufficient samples
53.6% Above average
Read 179
Write 188
Mixed 115
SusWrite 55.8
174% 135 MB/s
4K Read 3.3
4K Write 4.8
4K Mixed 1.9
240% 3.33 MB/s
Poor: 54%
This bench: 53.6%
Great: 74%
External USB3.0 DISK01 8TB
6TB free, PID null
SusWrite @10s intervals: 55 57 56 56 56 55 MB/s
Performing below expectations (30th percentile)
45.2% Average
Read 121
Write 131
Mixed 99.5
SusWrite 55.7
135% 102 MB/s
4K Read 4.1
4K Write 4.7
4K Mixed 1.7
233% 3.5 MB/s
Poor: 37%
This bench: 45.2%
Great: 66%
External USB3.0 DISK02 8TB
2TB free, PID null
SusWrite @10s intervals: 55 57 56 56 56 55 MB/s
Relative performance n/a - insufficient samples
45.5% Average
Read 138
Write 149
Mixed 130
SusWrite 55.7
158% 118 MB/s
4K Read 3.2
4K Write 4.1
4K Mixed 0.8
178% 2.7 MB/s
Poor: 33%
This bench: 45.5%
Great: 54%
External USB3.0 DISK03 8TB
7TB free, PID null
SusWrite @10s intervals: 166 170 169 168 170 165 MB/s
Relative performance n/a - insufficient samples
71.2% Very good
Read 145
Write 163
Mixed 121
SusWrite 168
206% 149 MB/s
4K Read 5.4
4K Write 4
4K Mixed 1
190% 3.47 MB/s
Poor: 35%
This bench: 71.2%
Great: 73%
External USB3.0 DISK04 8TB
7.5TB free, PID null
SusWrite @10s intervals: 193 191 193 192 193 190 MB/s
Relative performance n/a - insufficient samples
74.9% Very good
Read 173
Write 168
Mixed 111
SusWrite 192
218% 161 MB/s
4K Read 14.1
4K Write 1.5
4K Mixed 1.3
148% 5.63 MB/s
Poor: 35%
This bench: 74.9%
Great: 75%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Team Group Inc TEAMGROUP-UD4-3200 Group Inc TEAMGROUP-UD4-3200 Group Inc TEAMGROUP-UD4-3000 Group Inc TEAMGROUP-UD4-3000 32GB
2400, 2400, 2400, 2400 MHz
8192, 8192, 8192, 8192 MB
Performing below expectations (23rd percentile)
82.3% Excellent
MC Read 31
MC Write 30
MC Mixed 29
86% 30 GB/s
SC Read 18.4
SC Write 30.1
SC Mixed 24.6
70% 24.4 GB/s
Latency 97
41% 97 ns
Poor: 75%
This bench: 82.3%
Great: 109%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

 SkillBench Score 36: 0P 5R 3G 2B (High Scores)

Measures user input accuracy relative to the given hardware

Score Hit Rate Shots EFps 0.1% Low Refresh Rate Screen Resolution Monitor
36% 31% 32 475 358 75 21.7" 1280 720 GSM5B55 LG FULL HD
History: Score 0: 0P 0R 0G 0B | Score 36: 0P 5R 3G 2B
Typical PRIME Z690-P D4 Builds (Compare 9,772 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 199%
UFO
Desktop
Desktop 111%
UFO
Workstation
Workstation 203%
UFO

Motherboard: Asus PRIME Z690-P D4 - $306

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 97% - Outstanding Total price: $1,135
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate thousands of reddit accounts. Our benchmarks expose their spiel so they attack our reputation.
Why don’t PC brands endorse UserBenchmark?
Brands make boatloads on flagships like the 4090 and 14900KS. We help users get similar real-world performance for less money.
Why don’t youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't pay youtubers, so they don't praise us. Moreover, our data obstructs youtubers who promote overpriced or inferior products.
Why does UserBenchmark have negative trustpilot reviews?
The 200+ trustpilot reviews are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users don't give a monkey's about big brands.
Why is UserBenchmark popular with users?
Instead of pursuing brands for sponsorship, we've spent 13 years publishing real-world data for users.
The Best
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $174Nvidia RTX 4060 $293WD Black SN850X M.2 2TB $135
Intel Core i5-12400F $110Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385WD Black SN850X M.2 1TB $89
Intel Core i5-13600K $249Nvidia RTX 4070 $549Crucial T700 M.2 4TB $369
Today's hottest deals
If you buy something via a price link, UserBenchmark may earn a commission
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback