Default string

Performance Results

Benchmarks - missing GPU
Gaming
Gaming 0%
Incomplete
Desktop
Desktop 0%
Incomplete
Workstation
Workstation 0%
Incomplete
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing way below expectations (13th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 87 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components. Use the charts in the benchmark sections of this report to identify problem areas.
ProcessorWith a brilliant single core score, this CPU is the business: It demolishes everyday tasks such as web browsing, office apps and audio/video playback. Additionally this processor can handle intensive workstation, and even full-fledged server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 82.3%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is very good.
Boot Drive60.2% is a good SSD score. This drive enables fast boots, responsive applications and ensures minimum system IO wait times.
Memory176GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's far more than any current game requires. 176GB will also allow for large file and system caches, virtual machine hosting, software development, video editing and batch multimedia processing.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.
Run History
SystemDefault string  (all builds)
MotherboardDefault Default string
Memory171.9 GB free of 176 GB @ 2.7 GHz
Display1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit colors
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20200727
Uptime0 Days
Run DateJul 28 '20 at 03:59
Run Duration112 Seconds
Run User TWN-User
Background CPU0%

 PC Performing way below expectations (13th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
1st CPU: Intel Xeon Gold 6244
CPU0, 2 CPU, 16 cores, 32 threads
Base clock 3.6 GHz, turbo 3.8 GHz (avg)
Performing way below expectations (15th percentile)
82.3% Excellent
Memory 60.2
1-Core 130
2-Core 275
81% 155 Pts
4-Core 557
8-Core 1,069
97% 813 Pts
64-Core 2,695
167% 2,695 Pts
Poor: 79%
This bench: 82.3%
Great: 94%
Drive BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Transcend TS64ASTMM0000A 64GB
38GB free (System drive)
Firmware: 4A
SusWrite @10s intervals: 75 76 76 76 76 75 MB/s
Performing way below expectations (11th percentile)
60.2% Good
Read 420
Write 75.6
Mixed 121
SusWrite 75.4
38% 173 MB/s
4K Read 24.4
4K Write 67.6
4K Mixed 29
110% 40.3 MB/s
DQ Read 151
DQ Write 75.9
DQ Mixed 87.1
72% 105 MB/s
Poor: 60%
This bench: 60.2%
Great: 67%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Apacer AQD-D4U16R26-SE 11x16GB
11 of 24 slots used
176GB DIMM DDR4 clocked @ 2666 MHz
Relative performance n/a - insufficient samples
28.6% Poor
MC Read 11
MC Write 9.1
MC Mixed 9.9
29% 10 GB/s
SC Read 8.8
SC Write 7.5
SC Mixed 7
22% 7.77 GB/s
Latency 127
32% 127 ns
Poor: 29%
This bench: 28.6%
Great: 33%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Typical string Builds (Compare 14,707 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 25%
Surfboard
Desktop
Desktop 72%
Battleship
Workstation
Workstation 22%
Surfboard

System: Default string

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 87% - Excellent Total price: $87
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketing teams operate large numbers of reddit accounts. Because UserBenchmark’s data often contradicts their marketing spiel, they systematically attack our reputation.
Why don’t large PC brands support UserBenchmark?
PC brands make a lot of money on flagship hardware sales: 4090, 14900KS, 7950X3D etc. We help consumers get comparable real-world performance at a fraction of the cost.
Why don’t any youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't sponsor youtubers, so they have no incentive to praise us. Additionally, brands spend more on marketing weaker products which puts their youtubers at odds with UserBenchmark.
Why does UserBenchmark have so many negative trustpilot reviews?
Trustpilot hosts user-generated reviews in an online community. It's obvious that the 200+ UserBenchmark reviews, are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users aren't interested in promoting billon-dollar brands...
Why is UserBenchmark so popular with users?
Instead of pursuing lucrative sponsorships with billion-dollar PC brands, we have dedicated the last 13 years to providing comprehensive and accurate data to our users. As a result, most of our users return over and over again and collectively save millions every year.
The Best.
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $170Nvidia RTX 4060 $293Crucial MX500 250GB $39
Intel Core i5-12400F $120Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-13600K $260Nvidia RTX 4070 $550Samsung 870 Evo 250GB $45
HDDRAMUSB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $37Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $40SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $29Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $48SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $62G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16
If you make a purchase via one of these links, our site may earn a commission
Today's hottest deals
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback