Default string

Performance Results

Benchmarks - missing GPU
Gaming
Gaming 0%
Incomplete
Desktop
Desktop 0%
Incomplete
Workstation
Workstation 0%
Incomplete
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing as expected (43rd percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 57 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
ProcessorWith a brilliant single core score, this CPU is the business: It demolishes everyday tasks such as web browsing, office apps and audio/video playback. Additionally this processor can handle intensive workstation, and even full-fledged server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 90%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is excellent.
Boot Drive60.5% is a good SSD score. This drive enables fast boots, responsive applications and ensures minimum system IO wait times.
Memory176GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's far more than any current game requires. 176GB will also allow for large file and system caches, virtual machine hosting, software development, video editing and batch multimedia processing.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.
Run History
SystemDefault string  (all builds)
MotherboardDefault Default string
Memory171.9 GB free of 176 GB @ 2.7 GHz
Display1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit colors
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20200727
Uptime0 Days
Run DateJul 28 '20 at 04:24
Run Duration112 Seconds
Run User TWN-User
Background CPU0%

 PC Performing as expected (43rd percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
1st CPU: Intel Xeon Gold 6244
CPU0, 2 CPU, 16 cores, 32 threads
Base clock 3.6 GHz, turbo 4.2 GHz (avg)
Performing above expectations (60th percentile)
90% Outstanding
Memory 77.5
1-Core 137
2-Core 277
88% 164 Pts
4-Core 548
8-Core 1,065
96% 806 Pts
64-Core 2,687
166% 2,687 Pts
Poor: 79%
This bench: 90%
Great: 94%
Drive BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Transcend TS64ASTMM0000A 64GB
38GB free (System drive)
Firmware: 4A
SusWrite @10s intervals: 75 75 75 75 75 75 MB/s
Performing below expectations (25th percentile)
60.5% Good
Read 412
Write 75.5
Mixed 123
SusWrite 75.2
37% 171 MB/s
4K Read 24.8
4K Write 69.1
4K Mixed 29.5
112% 41.1 MB/s
DQ Read 150
DQ Write 76
DQ Mixed 86.6
71% 104 MB/s
Poor: 60%
This bench: 60.5%
Great: 67%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Apacer AQD-D4U16R26-SE 11x16GB
11 of 24 slots used
176GB DIMM DDR4 clocked @ 2666 MHz
Relative performance n/a - insufficient samples
94.3% Outstanding
MC Read 40.5
MC Write 42.4
MC Mixed 33.6
111% 38.8 GB/s
SC Read 6.6
SC Write 7.5
SC Mixed 7.2
20% 7.1 GB/s
Latency 85.3
47% 85.3 ns
Poor: 29%
This bench: 94.3%
Great: 33%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Typical string Builds (Compare 14,709 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 25%
Surfboard
Desktop
Desktop 72%
Battleship
Workstation
Workstation 22%
Surfboard

System: Default string

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 87% - Excellent Total price: $87
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate countless reddit accounts. UserBenchmark’s data exposes their marketing spiel so they systematically attack our reputation.
Why don’t large PC brands support UserBenchmark?
PC brands profit greatly from flagship hardware like the 4090, 14900KS, and 7950X3D. We help users get similar real-world performance for less money.
Why don’t any youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't sponsor youtubers, so they have no incentive to praise us. Moreover, brands pay more to market weaker products which puts their youtubers at odds with UserBenchmark.
Why does UserBenchmark have so many negative trustpilot reviews?
Trustpilot hosts user-generated online reviews. It's obvious that the 200+ UserBenchmark reviews, are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users aren't interested in promoting billon-dollar brands...
Why is UserBenchmark so popular with users?
Instead of pursuing lucrative sponsorships with billion-dollar PC brands, we have dedicated 13 years to publishing accurate real-world data. As a result, our users save millions every year and they return repeatedly.
The Best.
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $170Nvidia RTX 4060 $293Crucial MX500 250GB $39
Intel Core i5-12400F $122Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-13600K $260Nvidia RTX 4070 $550Samsung 870 Evo 250GB $45
HDDRAMUSB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $37Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $40SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $29Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $48SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $62G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16
If you make a purchase via one of these links, our site may earn a commission
Today's hottest deals
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback