TEST
YOUR PC
ADD TO PC
BUILD

Default string

Performance Results

Benchmarks - missing GPU
Gaming
Gaming 0%
Incomplete
Desktop
Desktop 0%
Incomplete
Workstation
Workstation 0%
Incomplete
Save results Copy results User guide
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing way below expectations (15th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 85 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components. Use the charts in the benchmark sections of this report to identify problem areas.
ProcessorWith a good single core score, this CPU can easily handle the majority of general computing tasks. Additionally this processor can handle intensive workstation, and even full-fledged server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 81.7%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is very good.
Boot Drive60.2% is a good SSD score. This drive enables fast boots, responsive applications and ensures minimum system IO wait times.
Memory176GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's far more than any current game requires. 176GB will also allow for large file and system caches, virtual machine hosting, software development, video editing and batch multimedia processing.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.
Run History
SystemDefault string  (all builds)
MotherboardDefault Default string
Memory171.9 GB free of 176 GB @ 2.7 GHz
Display1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit colors
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20200727
Uptime0 Days
Run DateJul 28 '20 at 04:14
Run Duration112 Seconds
Run User TWN-User
Background CPU0%

 PC Performing way below expectations (15th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
1st CPU: Intel Xeon Gold 6244
CPU0, 2 CPU, 16 cores, 32 threads
Base clock 3.6 GHz, turbo 3.7 GHz (avg)
Performing way below expectations (14th percentile)
81.7% Excellent
Memory 60.3
1-Core 118
2-Core 275
78% 151 Pts
4-Core 550
8-Core 1,072
96% 811 Pts
64-Core 2,712
168% 2,712 Pts
Poor: 79% ↑
This bench: 81.7%
 Great: 94%
Drive BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Transcend TS64ASTMM0000A 64GB
38GB free (System drive)
Firmware: 4A
SusWrite @10s intervals: 65 75 75 75 75 75 MB/s
Performing way below expectations (17th percentile)
60.2% Good
Read 422
Write 75.6
Mixed 122
SusWrite 73.5
38% 173 MB/s
4K Read 24.9
4K Write 66.4
4K Mixed 29.1
110% 40.1 MB/s
DQ Read 150
DQ Write 74.8
DQ Mixed 86.7
71% 104 MB/s
Poor: 60% ↑
This bench: 60.2%
 Great: 67%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Apacer AQD-D4U16R26-SE 11x16GB
11 of 24 slots used
176GB DIMM DDR4 clocked @ 2666 MHz
Relative performance n/a - insufficient samples
28% Poor
MC Read 10.4
MC Write 9.7
MC Mixed 9.1
28% 9.73 GB/s
SC Read 8.8
SC Write 7.5
SC Mixed 7
22% 7.77 GB/s
Latency 127
32% 127 ns
Poor: 29% ↑
This bench: 28%
 Great: 33%
Take a copy of your results How to check your in-game FPS

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Custom PC Builder (Explore upgrades for this PC) Build your perfect PC: compare component prices, popularity, speed and value for money

CHOOSE AN UPGRADE:

CPU GPU SSD HDD RAM MBD
Typical string Builds (Compare 14,708 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 25%
Surfboard
Desktop
Desktop 72%
Battleship
Workstation
Workstation 22%
Surfboard

System: Default string

CPU
Xeon E5-2620 v3IntelBench 66%, 6,890 samples1,027x
Xeon E5-2640 v3IntelBench 71%, 3,267 samples963x
Xeon E5-2670 v3IntelBench 66%, 3,953 samples911x
GPU
GTX 1050-TiNvidia  $59Bench 29%, 946,701 samples494x
UHD Graphics 600IntelBench 1%, 35,976 samples483x
GTX 1660S (Super)Nvidia  $195Bench 71%, 428,800 samples462x
SSD
A400 240GBKingston  $28Bench 66%, 424,288 samples333x
A400 480GBKingston  $38Bench 74%, 237,487 samples175x
A400 120GBKingston  $26Bench 61%, 166,392 samples150x
RAM
2x8GBUnknownBench 64%, 236,291 samples1,371x
Atermiter 2x8GBUnknownBench 59%, 2,316 samples491x
123456789012345678 4x2GBABCDBench 24%, 5,869 samples356x
EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 87% - Excellent Total price: $87
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate countless reddit accounts. UserBenchmark’s data exposes their marketing spiel so they systematically attack our reputation.
Why don’t large PC brands support UserBenchmark?
PC brands profit greatly from flagship hardware like the 4090, 14900KS, and 7950X3D. We help users get similar real-world performance for less money.
Why don’t any youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't sponsor youtubers, so they have no incentive to praise us. Moreover, brands pay more to market weaker products which puts their youtubers at odds with UserBenchmark.
Why does UserBenchmark have so many negative trustpilot reviews?
Trustpilot hosts user-generated online reviews. It's obvious that the 200+ UserBenchmark reviews, are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users aren't interested in promoting billon-dollar brands...
Why is UserBenchmark so popular with users?
Instead of pursuing lucrative sponsorships with billion-dollar PC brands, we have dedicated 13 years to publishing accurate real-world data. As a result, our users save millions every year and they return repeatedly.
The Best.
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $170Nvidia RTX 4060 $293Crucial MX500 250GB $39
Intel Core i5-12400F $120Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-13600K $260Nvidia RTX 4070 $550Samsung 870 Evo 250GB $45
HDDRAMUSB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $37Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $40SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $29Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $48SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $62G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16
If you make a purchase via one of these links, our site may earn a commission
Today's hottest
Amazon Ebay
deals
Build Test EFps
Can You Run It?
►
YouTube
*NEW*
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback