Gigabyte GA-X399 AORUS XTREME-CF

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 110%
UFO
Desktop
Desktop 93%
Nuclear submarine
Workstation
Workstation 137%
UFO
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing above expectations (66th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 34 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
ProcessorWith a brilliant single core score, this CPU is the business: It demolishes everyday tasks such as web browsing, office apps and audio/video playback. Additionally this processor can handle intensive workstation, and even full-fledged server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 85.1%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is very good.
Graphics124% is an outstanding 3D score, it's the bee's knees. This GPU can handle almost all 3D games at very high resolutions and ultra detail levels.
Boot Drive414% is an exceptional SSD score. This drive is suitable for heavy workstation use, it will facilitate fast boots, responsive applications and allow for fast transfers of multi-gigabyte files.
Memory64GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's far more than any current game requires. 64GB will also allow for large file and system caches, virtual machine hosting, software development, video editing and batch multimedia processing.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.
Run History
SystemGigabyte X399 AORUS XTREME
MotherboardGigabyte GA-X399 AORUS XTREME-CF  (all builds)
Memory59.8 GB free of 64 GB @ 3.2 GHz
Display3440 x 1440 - 32 Bit colors
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20191211
Uptime0 Days
Run DateJul 27 '20 at 07:40
Run Duration230 Seconds
Run User USA-User
Background CPU1%
Watch Gameplay: 2080-Ti + 9600K How to compare your gameplay

 PC Performing above expectations (66th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
AMD Ryzen TR 2950X-$1,075
SP3r2, 1 CPU, 16 cores, 32 threads
Base clock 3.5 GHz, turbo 4 GHz (avg)
Performing above expectations (79th percentile)
85.1% Excellent
Memory 76
1-Core 130
2-Core 256
84% 154 Pts
4-Core 504
8-Core 997
89% 751 Pts
64-Core 2,629
163% 2,629 Pts
Poor: 71%
This bench: 85.1%
Great: 90%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
Nvidia RTX 2080-Ti-$441
Nvidia(10DE 12A4) ≥ 4GB
CLim: 2160 MHz, MLim: 3500 MHz, Ram: 11GB, Driver: 451.67
Performing below potential (4th percentile) - GPU OC Guide
124% Outstanding
Lighting 142
Reflection 219
Parallax 233
116% 198 fps
MRender 254
Gravity 211
Splatting 136
157% 200 fps
Poor: 128%
This bench: 124%
Great: 174%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Amd-raid Array 4 1TB
875GB free (System drive)
Firmware: 9.2
SusWrite @10s intervals: 3992 4033 4036 4032 4147 4207 MB/s
Performing way above expectations (87th percentile)
414% Outstanding
Read 2,429
Write 3,883
Mixed 1,421
SusWrite 4,074
670% 2952 MB/s
4K Read 38.8
4K Write 77.9
4K Mixed 47.8
161% 54.8 MB/s
DQ Read 440
DQ Write 365
DQ Mixed 388
295% 398 MB/s
Poor: 59%
This bench: 414%
Great: 491%
Amd-raid Samsung SSD 860 1TB
819GB free
Firmware: RVQ0
SusWrite @10s intervals: 338 287 80 79 79 79 MB/s
Performing below expectations (22nd percentile)
62.8% Good
Read 392
Write 187
Mixed 312
SusWrite 157
58% 262 MB/s
4K Read 22.8
4K Write 46.5
4K Mixed 25.7
92% 31.7 MB/s
DQ Read 99.6
DQ Write 311
DQ Mixed 129
121% 180 MB/s
Poor: 51%
This bench: 62.8%
Great: 95%
Amd-raid Samsung SSD 850 1TB
221GB free
Firmware: EXM0
SusWrite @10s intervals: 407 414 408 417 416 420 MB/s
Performing above expectations (75th percentile)
84.3% Excellent
Read 452
Write 434
Mixed 377
SusWrite 414
94% 419 MB/s
4K Read 24.6
4K Write 44.8
4K Mixed 28.9
98% 32.8 MB/s
DQ Read 130
DQ Write 342
DQ Mixed 164
146% 212 MB/s
Poor: 64%
This bench: 84.3%
Great: 102%
Amd-raid CT2000BX50 2TB
648GB free
Firmware: M6CR
SusWrite @10s intervals: 386 393 388 396 396 399 MB/s
Performing way above expectations (100th percentile)
73.2% Very good
Read 453
Write 404
Mixed 368
SusWrite 393
91% 404 MB/s
4K Read 17.9
4K Write 47.3
4K Mixed 17.6
75% 27.6 MB/s
DQ Read 60
DQ Write 325
DQ Mixed 32.1
72% 139 MB/s
Poor: 29%
This bench: 73.2%
Great: 73%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Corsair CMW64GX4M8C3200C16 8x8GB
8 of 8 slots used
64GB DIMM DDR4 clocked @ 3200 MHz
Performing way above expectations (96th percentile)
189% Outstanding
MC Read 76.9
MC Write 76.2
MC Mixed 74
216% 75.7 GB/s
SC Read 20.8
SC Write 45.9
SC Mixed 29.5
92% 32.1 GB/s
Latency 88.3
45% 88.3 ns
Poor: 80%
This bench: 189%
Great: 189%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Typical GA-X399 AORUS XTREME-CF Builds (Compare 156 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 105%
UFO
Desktop
Desktop 89%
Aircraft carrier
Workstation
Workstation 127%
UFO

Motherboard: Gigabyte GA-X399 AORUS XTREME-CF

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 56% - Above average Total price: $1,894
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate thousands of reddit accounts. Our benchmarks expose their spiel so they attack our reputation.
Why don’t PC brands endorse UserBenchmark?
Brands make boatloads on flagships like the 4090 and 14900KS. We help users get similar real-world performance for less money.
Why don’t youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't pay youtubers, so they don't praise us. Moreover, our data obstructs youtubers who promote overpriced or inferior products.
Why does UserBenchmark have negative trustpilot reviews?
The 200+ trustpilot reviews are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users don't give a monkey's about big brands.
Why is UserBenchmark popular with users?
Instead of pursuing brands for sponsorship, we've spent 13 years publishing real-world data for users.
The Best
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $164Nvidia RTX 4060 $293WD Black SN850X M.2 2TB $150
Intel Core i5-12400F $110Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385WD Black SN850X M.2 1TB $89
Intel Core i5-13600K $245Nvidia RTX 4070 $549Crucial T700 M.2 4TB $359
Today's hottest deals
If you buy something via a price link, UserBenchmark may earn a commission
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback