Gigabyte GA-X399 AORUS XTREME-CF

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 108%
UFO
Desktop
Desktop 88%
Aircraft carrier
Workstation
Workstation 133%
UFO
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing as expected (54th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 46 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
ProcessorWith a brilliant single core score, this CPU is the business: It demolishes everyday tasks such as web browsing, office apps and audio/video playback. Additionally this processor can handle intensive workstation, and even full-fledged server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 82.6%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is very good.
Graphics126% is an outstanding 3D score, it's the bee's knees. This GPU can handle almost all 3D games at very high resolutions and ultra detail levels.
Boot Drive197% is an exceptional SSD score. This drive is suitable for heavy workstation use, it will facilitate fast boots, responsive applications and allow for fast transfers of multi-gigabyte files.
Memory64GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's far more than any current game requires. 64GB will also allow for large file and system caches, virtual machine hosting, software development, video editing and batch multimedia processing.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.
Run History
SystemGigabyte X399 AORUS XTREME
MotherboardGigabyte GA-X399 AORUS XTREME-CF  (all builds)
Memory59.3 GB free of 64 GB @ 3.2 GHz
Display3440 x 1440 - 32 Bit colors
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20191211
Uptime0 Days
Run DateJul 27 '20 at 01:25
Run Duration240 Seconds
Run User USA-User
Background CPU3%
Watch Gameplay: 2080-Ti + 9600K How to compare your gameplay

 PC Performing as expected (54th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
AMD Ryzen TR 2950X-$1,075
SP3r2, 1 CPU, 16 cores, 32 threads
Base clock 3.5 GHz, turbo 3.95 GHz (avg)
Performing above expectations (65th percentile)
82.6% Excellent
Memory 74.9
1-Core 123
2-Core 244
80% 147 Pts
4-Core 483
8-Core 962
85% 722 Pts
64-Core 2,460
152% 2,460 Pts
Poor: 71%
This bench: 82.6%
Great: 90%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
Nvidia RTX 2080-Ti-$441
Nvidia(10DE 12A4) ≥ 4GB
CLim: 2160 MHz, MLim: 3500 MHz, Ram: 11GB, Driver: 451.67
Performing below potential (4th percentile) - GPU OC Guide
126% Outstanding
Lighting 146
Reflection 211
Parallax 229
119% 195 fps
MRender 248
Gravity 211
Splatting 142
158% 201 fps
Poor: 128%
This bench: 126%
Great: 174%
Drive BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Amd-raid Array 4 1TB
888GB free (System drive)
Firmware: 9.2
SusWrite @10s intervals: 1539 1412 1414 1858 1696 1723 MB/s
Performing as expected (52nd percentile)
197% Outstanding
Read 1,406
Write 40.4
Mixed 194
SusWrite 1,607
180% 812 MB/s
4K Read 18.4
4K Write 25.1
4K Mixed 26.1
75% 23.2 MB/s
DQ Read 551
DQ Write 287
DQ Mixed 387
296% 408 MB/s
Poor: 59%
This bench: 197%
Great: 491%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Corsair CMW64GX4M8C3200C16 8x8GB
8 of 8 slots used
64GB DIMM DDR4 clocked @ 3200 MHz
Performing way above expectations (94th percentile)
189% Outstanding
MC Read 76.7
MC Write 77.4
MC Mixed 73.6
217% 75.9 GB/s
SC Read 20.3
SC Write 43.7
SC Mixed 29
89% 31 GB/s
Latency 90.6
44% 90.6 ns
Poor: 80%
This bench: 189%
Great: 189%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Typical GA-X399 AORUS XTREME-CF Builds (Compare 155 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 105%
UFO
Desktop
Desktop 89%
Aircraft carrier
Workstation
Workstation 127%
UFO

Motherboard: Gigabyte GA-X399 AORUS XTREME-CF

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 56% - Above average Total price: $1,880
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate countless reddit accounts. UserBenchmark’s data exposes their marketing spiel so they systematically attack our reputation.
Why don’t large PC brands support UserBenchmark?
PC brands profit greatly from flagship hardware like the 4090, 14900KS, and 7950X3D. We help users get similar real-world performance for less money.
Why don’t any youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't sponsor youtubers, so they have no incentive to praise us. Moreover, brands pay more to market weaker products which puts their youtubers at odds with UserBenchmark.
Why does UserBenchmark have so many negative trustpilot reviews?
Trustpilot hosts user-generated online reviews. It's obvious that the 200+ UserBenchmark reviews, are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users aren't interested in promoting billon-dollar brands...
Why is UserBenchmark so popular with users?
Instead of pursuing lucrative sponsorships with billion-dollar PC brands, we have dedicated 13 years to publishing accurate real-world data. As a result, our users save millions every year and they return repeatedly.
The Best.
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $170Nvidia RTX 4060 $293Crucial MX500 250GB $39
Intel Core i5-12400F $120Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-13600K $260Nvidia RTX 4070 $550Samsung 870 Evo 250GB $45
HDDRAMUSB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $37Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $40SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $29Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $48SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $62G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16
If you make a purchase via one of these links, our site may earn a commission
Today's hottest deals
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback