Gigabyte GA-X399 AORUS XTREME-CF

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 115%
UFO
Desktop
Desktop 92%
Nuclear submarine
Workstation
Workstation 141%
UFO
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing above expectations (64th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 36 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
ProcessorWith a brilliant single core score, this CPU is the business: It demolishes everyday tasks such as web browsing, office apps and audio/video playback. Additionally this processor can handle intensive workstation, and even full-fledged server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 84.5%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is very good.
Graphics131% is an outstanding 3D score, it's the bee's knees. This GPU can handle almost all 3D games at very high resolutions and ultra detail levels.
Boot Drive304% is an exceptional SSD score. This drive is suitable for heavy workstation use, it will facilitate fast boots, responsive applications and allow for fast transfers of multi-gigabyte files.
Memory64GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's far more than any current game requires. 64GB will also allow for large file and system caches, virtual machine hosting, software development, video editing and batch multimedia processing.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.
Run History
SystemGigabyte X399 AORUS XTREME
MotherboardGigabyte GA-X399 AORUS XTREME-CF  (all builds)
Memory60.3 GB free of 64 GB @ 3.2 GHz
Display3440 x 1440 - 32 Bit colors
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20191211
Uptime0 Days
Run DateJul 27 '20 at 02:54
Run Duration170 Seconds
Run User USA-User
Background CPU2%
Watch Gameplay: 2080-Ti + 9600K How to compare your gameplay

 PC Performing above expectations (64th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
AMD Ryzen TR 2950X-$1,075
SP3r2, 1 CPU, 16 cores, 32 threads
Base clock 3.5 GHz, turbo 3.95 GHz (avg)
Performing above expectations (75th percentile)
84.5% Excellent
Memory 75.6
1-Core 126
2-Core 255
83% 152 Pts
4-Core 500
8-Core 984
88% 742 Pts
64-Core 2,472
153% 2,472 Pts
Poor: 71%
This bench: 84.5%
Great: 90%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
Nvidia RTX 2080-Ti-$441
Nvidia(10DE 12A4) ≥ 4GB
CLim: 2250 MHz, MLim: 3500 MHz, Ram: 11GB, Driver: 451.67
Performing below potential (6th percentile) - GPU OC Guide
131% Outstanding
Lighting 158
Reflection 209
Parallax 237
129% 202 fps
MRender 237
Gravity 224
Splatting 143
158% 201 fps
Poor: 128%
This bench: 131%
Great: 174%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Amd-raid Array 4 1TB
883GB free (System drive)
Firmware: 9.2
SusWrite @10s intervals: 2861 2771 2545 3024 3026 3073 MB/s
Performing above expectations (83rd percentile)
304% Outstanding
Read 1,763
Write 423
Mixed 1,204
SusWrite 2,884
353% 1,568 MB/s
4K Read 31.7
4K Write 59.1
4K Mixed 37.8
128% 42.9 MB/s
DQ Read 513
DQ Write 282
DQ Mixed 390
292% 395 MB/s
Poor: 59%
This bench: 304%
Great: 491%
Amd-raid Samsung SSD 860 1TB
922GB free
Firmware: RVQ0
SusWrite @10s intervals: 5.7 6.1 8.1 9.6 9.7 9.9 MB/s
Relative performance (0th percentile)
28.2% Poor
Read 299
Write 15.7
Mixed 45.5
SusWrite 8.2
20% 92.2 MB/s
4K Read 14.3
4K Write 13.4
4K Mixed 14.5
47% 14.1 MB/s
DQ Read 26.8
DQ Write 13.8
DQ Mixed 26.8
18% 22.5 MB/s
Poor: 51%
This bench: 28.2%
Great: 95%
Amd-raid Samsung SSD 850 1TB
221GB free
Firmware: EXM0
SusWrite @10s intervals: 9.9 9.4 8.7 10 10 10 MB/s
Relative performance (0th percentile)
35% Below average
Read 319
Write 18.7
Mixed 71.5
SusWrite 9.7
22% 105 MB/s
4K Read 19.8
4K Write 20.4
4K Mixed 19.3
66% 19.8 MB/s
DQ Read 35.5
DQ Write 23.5
DQ Mixed 56.3
35% 38.4 MB/s
Poor: 64%
This bench: 35%
Great: 102%
Amd-raid CT2000BX50 2TB
658GB free
Firmware: M6CR
SusWrite @10s intervals: 6.1 6.1 6.6 7.6 7.6 7.8 MB/s
Relative performance (0th percentile)
25.4% Poor
Read 294
Write 11.3
Mixed 26.7
SusWrite 6.9
18% 84.7 MB/s
4K Read 15.1
4K Write 10.1
4K Mixed 9.7
41% 11.6 MB/s
DQ Read 30.2
DQ Write 12.3
DQ Mixed 16.7
14% 19.7 MB/s
Poor: 29%
This bench: 25.4%
Great: 73%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Corsair CMW64GX4M8C3200C16 8x8GB
8 of 8 slots used
64GB DIMM DDR4 clocked @ 3200 MHz
Performing way above expectations (91st percentile)
188% Outstanding
MC Read 76.8
MC Write 75.1
MC Mixed 73.7
215% 75.2 GB/s
SC Read 20.4
SC Write 44.7
SC Mixed 30.6
91% 31.9 GB/s
Latency 89.2
45% 89.2 ns
Poor: 80%
This bench: 188%
Great: 189%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Typical GA-X399 AORUS XTREME-CF Builds (Compare 156 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 105%
UFO
Desktop
Desktop 89%
Aircraft carrier
Workstation
Workstation 127%
UFO

Motherboard: Gigabyte GA-X399 AORUS XTREME-CF

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 56% - Above average Total price: $1,894
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate thousands of reddit accounts. Our benchmarks expose their spiel so they attack our reputation.
Why don’t PC brands endorse UserBenchmark?
Brands make boatloads on flagships like the 4090 and 14900KS. We help users get similar real-world performance for less money.
Why don’t youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't pay youtubers, so they don't praise us. Moreover, our data obstructs youtubers who promote overpriced or inferior products.
Why does UserBenchmark have negative trustpilot reviews?
The 200+ trustpilot reviews are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users don't give a monkey's about big brands.
Why is UserBenchmark popular with users?
Instead of pursuing brands for sponsorship, we've spent 13 years publishing real-world data for users.
The Best
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $164Nvidia RTX 4060 $293WD Black SN850X M.2 2TB $150
Intel Core i5-12400F $110Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385WD Black SN850X M.2 1TB $89
Intel Core i5-13600K $245Nvidia RTX 4070 $549Crucial T700 M.2 4TB $359
Today's hottest deals
If you buy something via a price link, UserBenchmark may earn a commission
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback