Gigabyte GA-X399 AORUS XTREME-CF

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 108%
UFO
Desktop
Desktop 88%
Aircraft carrier
Workstation
Workstation 132%
UFO
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing as expected (40th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 60 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
ProcessorWith a brilliant single core score, this CPU is the business: It demolishes everyday tasks such as web browsing, office apps and audio/video playback. Additionally this processor can handle intensive workstation, and even full-fledged server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 82.9%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is very good.
Graphics125% is an outstanding 3D score, it's the bee's knees. This GPU can handle almost all 3D games at very high resolutions and ultra detail levels.
Boot Drive207% is an exceptional SSD score. This drive is suitable for heavy workstation use, it will facilitate fast boots, responsive applications and allow for fast transfers of multi-gigabyte files.
Memory64GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's far more than any current game requires. 64GB will also allow for large file and system caches, virtual machine hosting, software development, video editing and batch multimedia processing.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.
Run History
SystemGigabyte X399 AORUS XTREME
MotherboardGigabyte GA-X399 AORUS XTREME-CF  (all builds)
Memory60.7 GB free of 64 GB @ 3.2 GHz
Display3440 x 1440 - 32 Bit colors
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20191211
Uptime0 Days
Run DateJul 27 '20 at 01:50
Run Duration234 Seconds
Run User USA-User
Background CPU3%
Watch Gameplay: 2080-Ti + 9600K How to compare your gameplay

 PC Performing as expected (40th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
AMD Ryzen TR 2950X-$1,075
SP3r2, 1 CPU, 16 cores, 32 threads
Base clock 3.5 GHz, turbo 3.95 GHz (avg)
Performing above expectations (65th percentile)
82.9% Excellent
Memory 75.1
1-Core 122
2-Core 244
80% 147 Pts
4-Core 485
8-Core 967
86% 726 Pts
64-Core 2,456
152% 2,456 Pts
Poor: 71%
This bench: 82.9%
Great: 90%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
Nvidia RTX 2080-Ti-$441
Nvidia(10DE 12A4) ≥ 4GB
CLim: 2160 MHz, MLim: 3500 MHz, Ram: 11GB, Driver: 451.67
Performing below potential (4th percentile) - GPU OC Guide
125% Outstanding
Lighting 146
Reflection 213
Parallax 232
119% 197 fps
MRender 250
Gravity 211
Splatting 136
156% 199 fps
Poor: 128%
This bench: 125%
Great: 174%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Amd-raid Array 4 1TB
888GB free (System drive)
Firmware: 9.2
SusWrite @10s intervals: 1978 2064 2058 2022 2051 2052 MB/s
Performing as expected (52nd percentile)
207% Outstanding
Read 1,172
Write 1709
Mixed 1,026
SusWrite 2,037
337% 1,486 MB/s
4K Read 7.8
4K Write 20
4K Mixed 14.5
41% 14.1 MB/s
DQ Read 537
DQ Write 496
DQ Mixed 510
384% 514 MB/s
Poor: 59%
This bench: 207%
Great: 491%
Amd-raid Samsung SSD 860 1TB
922GB free
Firmware: RVQ0
SusWrite @10s intervals: 332 342 337 335 336 335 MB/s
Performing way below expectations (8th percentile)
54% Above average
Read 342
Write 444
Mixed 354
SusWrite 336
84% 369 MB/s
4K Read 8
4K Write 14.4
4K Mixed 9.2
32% 10.5 MB/s
DQ Read 102
DQ Write 354
DQ Mixed 137
131% 197 MB/s
Poor: 51%
This bench: 54%
Great: 95%
Amd-raid Samsung SSD 850 1TB
221GB free
Firmware: EXM0
SusWrite @10s intervals: 329 341 336 334 337 334 MB/s
Relative performance (0th percentile)
59.9% Above average
Read 446
Write 344
Mixed 379
SusWrite 335
84% 376 MB/s
4K Read 8.7
4K Write 14
4K Mixed 11.5
35% 11.4 MB/s
DQ Read 129
DQ Write 346
DQ Mixed 160
145% 212 MB/s
Poor: 64%
This bench: 59.9%
Great: 102%
Amd-raid CT2000BX50 2TB
658GB free
Firmware: M6CR
SusWrite @10s intervals: 39 217 354 354 368 353 MB/s
Performing way below expectations (17th percentile)
37.9% Below average
Read 312
Write 38.7
Mixed 37.8
SusWrite 281
37% 167 MB/s
4K Read 9.3
4K Write 14.7
4K Mixed 0.6
23% 8.2 MB/s
DQ Read 59.7
DQ Write 39.6
DQ Mixed 0.5
14% 33.3 MB/s
Poor: 29%
This bench: 37.9%
Great: 73%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Corsair CMW64GX4M8C3200C16 8x8GB
8 of 8 slots used
64GB DIMM DDR4 clocked @ 3200 MHz
Performing way above expectations (96th percentile)
189% Outstanding
MC Read 77.1
MC Write 78.7
MC Mixed 72.1
217% 76 GB/s
SC Read 20
SC Write 44
SC Mixed 29.8
89% 31.3 GB/s
Latency 90.1
44% 90.1 ns
Poor: 80%
This bench: 189%
Great: 189%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Typical GA-X399 AORUS XTREME-CF Builds (Compare 155 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 105%
UFO
Desktop
Desktop 89%
Aircraft carrier
Workstation
Workstation 127%
UFO

Motherboard: Gigabyte GA-X399 AORUS XTREME-CF

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 56% - Above average Total price: $1,880
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate countless reddit accounts. UserBenchmark’s data exposes their marketing spiel so they systematically attack our reputation.
Why don’t large PC brands support UserBenchmark?
PC brands profit greatly from flagship hardware like the 4090, 14900KS, and 7950X3D. We help users get similar real-world performance for less money.
Why don’t any youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't sponsor youtubers, so they have no incentive to praise us. Moreover, brands pay more to market weaker products which puts their youtubers at odds with UserBenchmark.
Why does UserBenchmark have so many negative trustpilot reviews?
Trustpilot hosts user-generated online reviews. It's obvious that the 200+ UserBenchmark reviews, are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users aren't interested in promoting billon-dollar brands...
Why is UserBenchmark so popular with users?
Instead of pursuing lucrative sponsorships with billion-dollar PC brands, we have dedicated 13 years to publishing accurate real-world data. As a result, our users save millions every year and they return repeatedly.
The Best.
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $170Nvidia RTX 4060 $293Crucial MX500 250GB $39
Intel Core i5-12400F $120Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-13600K $260Nvidia RTX 4070 $550Samsung 870 Evo 250GB $45
HDDRAMUSB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $37Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $40SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $29Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $48SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $62G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16
If you make a purchase via one of these links, our site may earn a commission
Today's hottest deals
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback