TEST
YOUR PC
ADD TO PC
BUILD

Gigabyte GA-H77M-D3H

Performance Results

Benchmarks - missing SSD
Gaming
Gaming 11%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 69%
Battle cruiser
Workstation
Workstation 8%
Tree trunk
Save results Copy results User guide
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing above expectations (66th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 34 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
ProcessorWith a good single core score, this CPU can easily handle the majority of general computing tasks. Despite its good single core score this processor isn't appropriate for workstation use due to its relatively weak multi-core performance. Finally, with a gaming score of 65.7%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is above average.
Graphics16.9% is a below average 3D score (RTX 2060S = 100%). This GPU can handle older games but it will struggle to render recent games at resolutions greater than 1080p. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Boot DriveThe boot partition is located on a mechanical or hybrid drive. Moving the system to an SSD will yield far faster boot times, better system responsiveness and faster application load times.
Memory8GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's sufficient for the vast majority of games. 8GB is also enough for moderate file and system caches which result in a very responsive system.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.
MotherboardGigabyte GA-H77M-D3H  (all builds)
Memory6 GB free of 8 GB @ 1.6 GHz
Display3440 x 1440 - 32 Bit barev
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20140116
Uptime0 Days
Run DateJul 19 '20 at 21:20
Run Duration112 Seconds
Run User CZE-User
Background CPU2%

 PC Performing above expectations (66th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
Intel Core i3-3220-$60
Intel(R) Core(TM) i3-3220 CPU @ 3.30GHz, 1 CPU, 2 cores, 4 threads
Base clock 3.3 GHz, turbo 3.3 GHz (avg)
Performing way above expectations (100th percentile)
65.7% Good
Memory 92.3
1-Core 90.6
2-Core 143
68% 109 Pts
4-Core 229
8-Core 230
31% 229 Pts
64-Core 228
14% 228 Pts
Poor: 38% ↑
This bench: 65.7%
 Great: 62%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
Nvidia GTX 750-Ti-$92
Zotac(19DA 288A) 2GB
CLim: 1306 MHz, MLim: 1350 MHz, Ram: 2GB, Driver: 446.14
Performing as expected (58th percentile)
16.9% Very poor
Lighting 20.8
Reflection 17
Parallax 20
17% 19.2 fps
MRender 24.5
Gravity 21.9
Splatting 16.9
17% 21.1 fps
Poor: 16% ↑
This bench: 16.9%
 Great: 19%
Drive BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
WD Blue 500GB (2010)-$25
352GB free (System drive)
Firmware: 19.01H19
SusWrite @10s intervals: 61 64 75 61 63 93 MB/s
Performing as expected (41st percentile)
50.8% Above average
Read 108
Write 90
Mixed 59
SusWrite 69.3
60% 81.4 MB/s
4K Read 0.7
4K Write 1.8
4K Mixed 0.7
140% 1.07 MB/s
Poor: 24% ↑
This bench: 50.8%
 Great: 69%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Hynix HMT325U6EFR8C-PB HMT325U6EFR8C-PB HMT451U6AFR8C-PB 8GB
1600, 1600, 1600 MHz
2048, 2048, 4096 MB
Relative performance n/a - insufficient samples
33% Below average
MC Read 11
MC Write 10.3
MC Mixed 9.6
29% 10.3 GB/s
SC Read 10.6
SC Write 11.3
SC Mixed 10.2
31% 10.7 GB/s
Latency 63.5
63% 63.5 ns
Poor: 33% ↑
This bench: 33%
 Great: 57%
Take a copy of your results How to check your in-game FPS

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Custom PC Builder (Explore upgrades for this PC) Build your perfect PC: compare component prices, popularity, speed and value for money

CHOOSE AN UPGRADE:

CPU GPU SSD HDD RAM MBD
Typical GA-H77M-D3H Builds (Compare 1,275 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 6%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 62%
Destroyer
Workstation
Workstation 6%
Tree trunk

Motherboard: Gigabyte GA-H77M-D3H - $99

CPU
Core i7-3770Intel  $297Bench 69%, 278,207 samples350x
Core i5-3470Intel  $59Bench 63%, 223,595 samples168x
Core i5-3570IntelBench 65%, 104,858 samples124x
GPU
HD 2500 (Desktop 1.05 GHz)IntelBench 1%, 146,665 samples96x
GTX 1050-TiNvidia  $59Bench 29%, 946,701 samples95x
GTX 1060-6GBNvidia  $117Bench 56%, 1,368,019 samples69x
SSD
A400 240GBKingston  $28Bench 66%, 424,288 samples60x
860 Evo 500GBSamsung  $76Bench 105%, 762,998 samples41x
850 Evo 500GBSamsung  $94Bench 112%, 695,664 samples23x
RAM
Savage DDR3 1600 C9 2x4GBHyperXBench 51%, 78,181 samples35x
HyperX DDR3 1600 C9 4x4GBKingstonBench 56%, 28,461 samples12x
99U5471-020.A00LF 2x4GBKingstonBench 48%, 6,486 samples9x
EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 64% - Good Total price: $424
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate countless reddit accounts. UserBenchmark’s data exposes their marketing spiel so they systematically attack our reputation.
Why don’t large PC brands support UserBenchmark?
PC brands profit greatly from flagship hardware like the 4090, 14900KS, and 7950X3D. We help users get similar real-world performance for less money.
Why don’t any youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't sponsor youtubers, so they have no incentive to praise us. Moreover, brands pay youtubers extra to promote inferior products but UserBenchmark’s data exposes them.
Why does UserBenchmark have so many negative trustpilot reviews?
Trustpilot hosts user-generated online reviews. It's obvious that the 200+ UserBenchmark reviews, are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users aren't interested in promoting billon-dollar brands.
Why is UserBenchmark so popular with users?
Instead of pursuing lucrative sponsorships with billion-dollar PC brands, we have dedicated 13 years to publishing accurate real-world data. As a result, our users save millions every year and they keep returning.
The Best.
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $170Nvidia RTX 4060 $293Crucial MX500 250GB $39
Intel Core i5-12400F $122Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-13600K $260Nvidia RTX 4070 $550Samsung 870 Evo 250GB $45
HDDRAMUSB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $37Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $40SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $28Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $48SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $62G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16
If you make a purchase via one of these links, our site may earn a commission
Today's hottest
Amazon Ebay
deals
Build Test EFps
Can You Run It?
►
YouTube
*NEW*
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback