Gigabyte GA-H61M-S1

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 15%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 75%
Battleship
Workstation
Workstation 12%
Tree trunk
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing above expectations (65th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 35 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
ProcessorWith a good single core score, this CPU can easily handle the majority of general computing tasks. Additionally this processor can handle very light workstation, and even some very light server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 74.7%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is good.
Graphics16.7% is a below average 3D score (RTX 2060S = 100%). This GPU can handle older games but it will struggle to render recent games at resolutions greater than 1080p. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Boot Drive21.5% is an extremely low SSD score, this system will benefit from a faster SSD.
Memory8GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's sufficient for the vast majority of games. 8GB is also enough for moderate file and system caches which result in a very responsive system.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.
MotherboardGigabyte GA-H61M-S1  (all builds)
Memory5.5 GB free of 8 GB @ 1.3 GHz
DisplayЦвета: 1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20140225
Uptime0.9 Days
Run DateJul 14 '20 at 11:44
Run Duration138 Seconds
Run User UKR-User
Background CPU3%

 PC Performing above expectations (65th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
Intel Core i5-2400-$250
Intel(R) Core(TM) i5-2400 CPU @ 3.10GHz, 1 CPU, 4 cores, 4 threads
Base clock 3.4 GHz, turbo 3.5 GHz (avg)
Performing way above expectations (100th percentile)
74.7% Very good
Memory 91.5
1-Core 87.5
2-Core 173
70% 117 Pts
4-Core 336
8-Core 336
45% 336 Pts
64-Core 333
21% 333 Pts
Poor: 42%
This bench: 74.7%
Great: 70%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
AMD RX 550-$79
Asus(1043 0553) 2GB
CLim: 1071 MHz, MLim: 1500 MHz, Ram: 2GB, Driver: 19.12.3
Performing way above expectations (99th percentile)
16.7% Very poor
Lighting 18.1
Reflection 27.1
Parallax 23.3
15% 22.8 fps
MRender 26.2
Gravity 17.6
Splatting 29.9
21% 24.6 fps
Poor: 12%
This bench: 16.7%
Great: 16%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Kingston A400 120GB-$28
18GB free (System drive)
Firmware: SBFKB1D1
SusWrite @10s intervals: 94 51 6.4 2.3 4.5 37 MB/s
Performing below potential (2nd percentile) - Ensure that this drive is connected to a SATA 3.0 port with a SATA 3.0 cable
21.5% Poor
Read 182
Write 86
Mixed 71.3
SusWrite 32.7
20% 93.1 MB/s
4K Read 11.4
4K Write 16.3
4K Mixed 9.6
38% 12.4 MB/s
DQ Read 9.5
DQ Write 15.3
DQ Mixed 11.6
9% 12.1 MB/s
Poor: 33%
This bench: 21.5%
Great: 85%
Seagate Barracuda 7200.14 500GB-$20
252GB free
Firmware: KC45
SusWrite @10s intervals: 92 93 93 94 91 91 MB/s
Performing below expectations (30th percentile)
50.9% Above average
Read 85.5
Write 83.8
Mixed 48
SusWrite 92.1
57% 77.3 MB/s
4K Read 0.7
4K Write 0.9
4K Mixed 0.7
124% 0.77 MB/s
Poor: 27%
This bench: 50.9%
Great: 88%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Unknown TEAMGROUP-UD3-1333 1x8GB
1 of 2 slots used
8GB DIMM DDR3 clocked @ 1333 MHz
Performing way above expectations (95th percentile)
29.8% Poor
MC Read 9.5
MC Write 9.5
MC Mixed 8.5
26% 9.17 GB/s
SC Read 8.9
SC Write 9.8
SC Mixed 9.7
27% 9.47 GB/s
Latency 64.9
62% 64.9 ns
Poor: 21%
This bench: 29.8%
Great: 30%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Typical GA-H61M-S1 Builds (Compare 2,461 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 2%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 58%
Gunboat
Workstation
Workstation 2%
Tree trunk

Motherboard: Gigabyte GA-H61M-S1 - $200

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 72% - Very good Total price: $287
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate thousands of reddit accounts. Our benchmarks expose their spiel so they attack our reputation.
Why don’t PC brands endorse UserBenchmark?
Brands make boatloads on flagships like the 4090 and 14900KS. We help users get similar real-world performance for less money.
Why don’t youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't pay youtubers, so they don't praise us. Moreover, our data obstructs youtubers who promote overpriced or inferior products.
Why does UserBenchmark have negative trustpilot reviews?
The 200+ trustpilot reviews are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users don't give a monkey's about big brands.
Why is UserBenchmark popular with users?
Instead of pursuing brands for sponsorship, we've spent 13 years publishing real-world data for users.
The Best
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $169Nvidia RTX 4060 $293WD Black SN850X M.2 2TB $135
Intel Core i5-12400F $110Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385WD Black SN850X M.2 1TB $75
Intel Core i5-13600K $249Nvidia RTX 4070 $549Crucial T700 M.2 4TB $369
Today's hottest deals
If you buy something via a price link, UserBenchmark may earn a commission
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback