Performance Results


Gaming 36% Jet ski	Desktop 64% Destroyer	Workstation 25% Raft


PC Status	Overall this PC is performing below expectations (29th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 71 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components. Use the charts in the benchmark sections of this report to identify problem areas.
Processor	With an average single core score, this CPU can handle browsing the web, email, video playback and the majority of general computing tasks including light gaming when coupled with an appropriate GPU. Finally, with a gaming score of 55.4%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is average.
Graphics	64.1% is a good 3D score. This GPU can handle the majority of recent games at high resolutions and ultra detail levels.
Boot Drive	48.4% is a reasonable SSD score. This drive enables fast boots and responsive applications.
Memory	8GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's sufficient for the vast majority of games. 8GB is also enough for moderate file and system caches which result in a very responsive system.
OS Version	Although Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.

Very high background CPU (42%). High background CPU reduces benchmark accuracy. How to reduce background CPU.

PC Performing below expectations (29^th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor	Bench	Normal	Heavy	Server
AMD FX-4300-$73 55,454 User benchmarks, average bench 52% CPUSocket, 1 CPU, 2 cores, 4 threads Base clock 3.8 GHz, turbo 3.75 GHz (avg) Performing above expectations (73^rd percentile)	55.4% Above average	Memory 87.2 1-Core 52.7 2-Core 88.7 51% 76.2 Pts	4-Core 145 8-Core 117 18% 131 Pts	64-Core 125 8% 125 Pts
Poor: 36% ↑ This bench: 55.4% Great: 60%

Graphics Card	Bench	3D DX9	3D DX10	3D DX11
Nvidia GTX 1660-$209 230,793 User benchmarks, average bench 68% Zotac(19DA 5543) CLim: 2100 MHz, MLim: 2000 MHz, Ram: 6GB, Driver: 445.87 Performing below potential (16^th percentile) - GPU OC Guide	64.1% Good	Lighting 82 Reflection 80.6 Parallax 75.5 67% 79.4 fps	MRender 68.6 Gravity 74.8 Splatting 72 59% 71.8 fps
Poor: 62% ↑ This bench: 64.1% Great: 73%

Drives	Bench	Sequential	Random 4k	Deep queue 4k
SanDisk Ultra II 960GB-$100 35,454 User benchmarks, average bench 85% 71GB free (System drive) Firmware: X41200RL SusWrite @10s intervals: 182 164 146 168 142 178 MB/s Performing way below expectations (1^st percentile)	48.4% Average	Read 343 Write 295 Mixed 226 SusWrite 163 57% 257 MB/s	4K Read 19.1 4K Write 29.5 4K Mixed 21.9 73% 23.5 MB/s	DQ Read 28.2 DQ Write 61.6 DQ Mixed 36.5 30% 42.1 MB/s
Poor: 62% ↑ This bench: 48.4% Great: 107%
WD Blue 1TB (2012)-$29 3,105,054 User benchmarks, average bench 83% 697GB free Firmware: 02.01A02 SusWrite @10s intervals: 119 123 133 135 144 149 MB/s Performing as expected (47^th percentile)	83.2% Excellent	Read 156 Write 157 Mixed 87.2 SusWrite 134 98% 133 MB/s	4K Read 1.1 4K Write 2.6 4K Mixed 1.1 216% 1.6 MB/s
Poor: 52% ↑ This bench: 83.2% Great: 109%

Memory Kit	Bench	Multi core	Single core	Latency
Unknown TEAMGROUP-UD3-1333 1x8GB 66 User benchmarks, average bench 27% 1 of 4 slots used 8GB DIMM DDR3 1066 MHz clocked @ 533 MHz Performing below potential (7^th percentile) - ensure that an XMP BIOS profile is enabled: How to enable XMP	20.8% Poor	MC Read 6.8 MC Write 6.1 MC Mixed 5.9 18% 6.27 GB/s	SC Read 4.6 SC Write 4.7 SC Mixed 6.2 15% 5.17 GB/s	Latency 70.3 57% 70.3 ns
Poor: 21% ↑ This bench: 20.8% Great: 30%

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

CPU

GPU

SSD

HDD

RAM

Gaming 22%

Surfboard

Desktop 68%

Battle cruiser

Workstation 18%

Surfboard

RAM
TEAMGROUP-UD3-1600 2x8GBUnknownBench 52%, 6,864 samples	35x
NMUD380D81-1600C 1x8GBUnknownBench 28%, 485 samples	26x
Fury DDR3 1866 C10 2x8GBHyperXBench 59%, 122,541 samples	24x

Value: 80% - Very good

Total price: $217