Asus H110M-D

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 10%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 75%
Battleship
Workstation
Workstation 9%
Tree trunk
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing above expectations (74th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 26 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
ProcessorWith a brilliant single core score, this CPU is the business: It demolishes everyday tasks such as web browsing, office apps and audio/video playback. Additionally this processor can handle light workstation, and even some light server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 80.9%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is very good.
Graphics7.1% is a very low 3D score (RTX 2060S = 100%). This GPU can only handle very basic 3D games but it's fine for general computing tasks.
Boot Drive111% is an exceptional SSD score. This drive is suitable for heavy workstation use, it will facilitate fast boots, responsive applications and allow for fast transfers of multi-gigabyte files.
Memory8GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's sufficient for the vast majority of games. 8GB is also enough for moderate file and system caches which result in a very responsive system.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.
Run History
3 years ago, 3 years ago.
MotherboardAsus H110M-D  (all builds)
Memory4.6 GB free of 8 GB @ 2.1 GHz
Display1600 x 900 - 32 Bit colors
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20170704
Uptime0 Days
Run DateJul 13 '20 at 09:42
Run Duration141 Seconds
Run User PHL-User
Background CPU10%

 PC Performing above expectations (74th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
Intel Core i5-7400-$70
LGA1151, 1 CPU, 4 cores, 4 threads
Base clock 3 GHz, turbo 3.3 GHz (avg)
Performing way above expectations (100th percentile)
80.9% Excellent
Memory 88.7
1-Core 110
2-Core 199
77% 133 Pts
4-Core 425
8-Core 409
56% 417 Pts
64-Core 415
26% 415 Pts
Poor: 43%
This bench: 80.9%
Great: 73%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
Nvidia GeForce GT 730
Nvidia(10DE 1287) 2GB
CLim: 901 MHz, MLim: 1252 MHz, Ram: 2GB, Driver: 451.67
Performing way above expectations (93rd percentile)
7.1% Terrible
Lighting 8.9
Reflection 7.85
Parallax 9.19
7% 8.64 fps
MRender 11
Gravity 7.33
Splatting 7.17
7% 8.5 fps
Poor: 3%
This bench: 7.1%
Great: 7%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Samsung 850 Evo 250GB-$100
143GB free (System drive)
Firmware: EMT02B6Q
SusWrite @10s intervals: 367 303 300 286 223 203 MB/s
Performing above expectations (70th percentile)
111% Outstanding
Read 444
Write 428
Mixed 354
SusWrite 280
84% 376 MB/s
4K Read 42.5
4K Write 107
4K Mixed 57.6
195% 69.1 MB/s
DQ Read 370
DQ Write 329
DQ Mixed 57.6
123% 252 MB/s
Poor: 72%
This bench: 111%
Great: 124%
Seagate Barracuda 7200.14 500GB-$20
307GB free
Firmware: KC45
SusWrite @10s intervals: 115 118 119 120 119 117 MB/s
Performing above expectations (73rd percentile)
66.3% Good
Read 113
Write 109
Mixed 56.8
SusWrite 118
72% 99.2 MB/s
4K Read 0.5
4K Write 1
4K Mixed 0.7
117% 0.73 MB/s
Poor: 27%
This bench: 66.3%
Great: 88%
External USB3.0 1TB
428GB free
Firmware: 0204
SusWrite @10s intervals: 37 40 41 41 40 41 MB/s
Performing below expectations (25th percentile)
22.5% Poor
Read 37.9
Write 32.8
Mixed 33.9
SusWrite 40
27% 36.2 MB/s
4K Read 0.5
4K Write 2.1
4K Mixed 0.6
126% 1.07 MB/s
Poor: 16%
This bench: 22.5%
Great: 72%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Kingmax GLJG42F-18KCGA------ 1x8GB
1 of 4 slots used
8GB DIMM DDR4 clocked @ 2133 MHz
Performing above expectations (80th percentile)
39% Below average
MC Read 14.4
MC Write 14.2
MC Mixed 11.1
38% 13.2 GB/s
SC Read 8.5
SC Write 12.1
SC Mixed 9.9
29% 10.2 GB/s
Latency 68.8
58% 68.8 ns
Poor: 26%
This bench: 39%
Great: 41%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Typical H110M-D Builds (Compare 2,007 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 21%
Surfboard
Desktop
Desktop 73%
Battleship
Workstation
Workstation 17%
Surfboard

Motherboard: Asus H110M-D

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 89% - Excellent Total price: $157
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate thousands of reddit accounts. Our benchmarks expose their spiel so they attack our reputation.
Why don’t PC brands endorse UserBenchmark?
Brands make boatloads on flagships like the 4090 and 14900KS. We help users get similar real-world performance for less money.
Why don’t youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't pay youtubers, so they don't praise us. Moreover, our data obstructs youtubers who promote overpriced or inferior products.
Why does UserBenchmark have negative trustpilot reviews?
The 200+ trustpilot reviews are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users don't give a monkey's about big brands.
Why is UserBenchmark popular with users?
Instead of pursuing brands for sponsorship, we've spent 13 years publishing real-world data for users.
The Best
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $164Nvidia RTX 4060 $293WD Black SN850X M.2 2TB $149
Intel Core i5-12400F $110Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385WD Black SN850X M.2 1TB $89
Intel Core i5-13600K $245Nvidia RTX 4070 $549Crucial T700 M.2 4TB $359
Today's hottest deals
If you buy something via a price link, UserBenchmark may earn a commission
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback