Asus H110M-D

Performance Results


Gaming 9% Tree trunk	Desktop 71% Battleship	Workstation 8% Tree trunk


PC Status	Overall this PC is performing above expectations (65th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 35 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
Processor	With a good single core score, this CPU can easily handle the majority of general computing tasks. Additionally this processor can handle very light workstation, and even some very light server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 75.5%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is good.
Graphics	7.02% is a very low 3D score (RTX 2060S = 100%). This GPU can only handle very basic 3D games but it's fine for general computing tasks.
Boot Drive	97.4% is a very good SSD score. This drive is suitable for moderate workstation use, it will facilitate fast boots, responsive applications and ensure minimum IO wait times.
Memory	8GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's sufficient for the vast majority of games. 8GB is also enough for moderate file and system caches which result in a very responsive system.
OS Version	Although Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.

High background CPU (23%). High background CPU reduces benchmark accuracy. How to reduce background CPU.

Run History

3 years ago, 3 years ago.

Motherboard	Asus H110M-D (all builds)
Memory	1.7 GB free of 8 GB @ 2.1 GHz
Display	1600 x 900 - 32 Bit colors
OS	Windows 10
BIOS Date	20170704
Uptime	0 Days
Run Date	Jul 13 '20 at 09:06
Run Duration	139 Seconds
Run User	PHL-User
Background CPU	23%

PC Performing above expectations (65^th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor	Bench	Normal	Heavy	Server
Intel Core i5-7400-$84 234,266 User benchmarks, average bench 64% LGA1151, 1 CPU, 4 cores, 4 threads Base clock 3 GHz, turbo 3.3 GHz (avg) Performing way above expectations (99^th percentile)	75.5% Very good	Memory 84.2 1-Core 102 2-Core 203 74% 130 Pts	4-Core 390 8-Core 374 51% 382 Pts	64-Core 404 25% 404 Pts
Poor: 43% ↑ This bench: 75.5% Great: 73%

Graphics Card	Bench	3D DX9	3D DX10	3D DX11
Nvidia GeForce GT 730 164,888 User benchmarks, average bench 5% Nvidia(10DE 1287) 2GB CLim: 901 MHz, MLim: 1252 MHz, Ram: 2GB, Driver: 432.00 Performing way above expectations (93^rd percentile)	7.02% Terrible	Lighting 8.87 Reflection 7.81 Parallax 9.19 7% 8.62 fps	MRender 10.8 Gravity 7.17 Splatting 6.96 7% 8.3 fps
Poor: 3% ↑ This bench: 7.02% Great: 7%

Drives	Bench	Sequential	Random 4k	Deep queue 4k
Samsung 850 Evo 250GB-$100 951,591 User benchmarks, average bench 103% 133GB free (System drive) Firmware: EMT02B6Q SusWrite @10s intervals: 226 215 212 206 207 208 MB/s Performing below expectations (29^th percentile)	97.4% Outstanding	Read 464 Write 436 Mixed 344 SusWrite 212 82% 364 MB/s	4K Read 40.4 4K Write 103 4K Mixed 54.1 185% 65.7 MB/s	DQ Read 43.8 DQ Write 332 DQ Mixed 250 175% 209 MB/s
Poor: 72% ↑ This bench: 97.4% Great: 124%
Seagate Barracuda 7200.14 500GB-$23 574,344 User benchmarks, average bench 58% 307GB free Firmware: KC45 SusWrite @10s intervals: 115 119 120 120 120 120 MB/s Performing above expectations (67^th percentile)	64.2% Good	Read 105 Write 100 Mixed 56.3 SusWrite 119 70% 95.2 MB/s	4K Read 0.5 4K Write 1 4K Mixed 0.7 117% 0.73 MB/s
Poor: 27% ↑ This bench: 64.2% Great: 88%
External USB3.0 1TB 2,106 User benchmarks, average bench 43% 428GB free Firmware: 0204 SusWrite @10s intervals: 40 41 41 41 41 39 MB/s Performing below expectations (25^th percentile)	22.4% Poor	Read 37 Write 32.5 Mixed 33.3 SusWrite 40.4 27% 35.8 MB/s	4K Read 0.5 4K Write 2.1 4K Mixed 0.7 138% 1.1 MB/s
Poor: 16% ↑ This bench: 22.4% Great: 72%

Memory Kit	Bench	Multi core	Single core	Latency
Kingmax GLJG42F-18KCGA------ 1x8GB 15 User benchmarks, average bench 34% 1 of 4 slots used 8GB DIMM DDR4 clocked @ 2133 MHz Performing above expectations (77^th percentile)	37.4% Below average	MC Read 14.2 MC Write 13.1 MC Mixed 10.3 36% 12.5 GB/s	SC Read 9.6 SC Write 11 SC Mixed 11.5 31% 10.7 GB/s	Latency 73.1 55% 73.1 ns
Poor: 26% ↑ This bench: 37.4% Great: 41%

Take a copy of your results How to check your in-game FPS

System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Custom PC Builder (Explore upgrades for this PC) Build your perfect PC: compare component prices, popularity, speed and value for money

CHOOSE AN UPGRADE:

CPU

GPU

SSD

HDD

RAM

MBD

Typical H110M-D Builds (Compare 1,992 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings

Gaming 21%

Surfboard

Desktop 73%

Battleship

Workstation 17%

Surfboard

Motherboard: Asus H110M-D

CPU
Core i5-7400Intel $84Bench 64%, 234,266 samples	418x
Core i3-7100Intel $40Bench 57%, 79,299 samples	241x
Core i5-6400Intel $70Bench 61%, 171,457 samples	220x

GPU
GTX 1050-TiNvidia $59Bench 29%, 946,701 samples	286x
HD 630 (Desktop Kaby Lake)IntelBench 5%, 153,031 samples	220x
HD 530 (Desktop Skylake)IntelBench 5%, 188,220 samples	196x

SSD
A400 240GBKingston $28Bench 66%, 424,288 samples	160x
A400 480GBKingston $38Bench 74%, 237,487 samples	83x
A400 120GBKingston $28Bench 61%, 166,392 samples	59x

RAM
HyperX 2133 C14 1x8GBKingstonBench 37%, 30,824 samples	41x
HyperX 2400 C15 1x8GBKingstonBench 40%, 46,352 samples	35x
M378A1K43CB2-CRC 1x8GBSamsungBench 39%, 22,600 samples	33x

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER

Value: 87% - Excellent

Total price: $171

CPU	GPU	SSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $176	Nvidia RTX 4060 $293	Crucial MX500 250GB $39
Intel Core i5-12400F $124	Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385	Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-13600K $260	Nvidia RTX 4070 $549	Samsung 870 Evo 250GB $45

HDD	RAM	USB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $37	Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $40	SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $39	Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $48	SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $62	G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351	SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16