Gigabyte Z390 AORUS PRO

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 103%
UFO
Desktop
Desktop 101%
UFO
Workstation
Workstation 105%
UFO
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing as expected (45th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 55 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
ProcessorWith an outstanding single core score, this CPU is the cat's whiskers: It demolishes everyday tasks such as web browsing, office apps and audio/video playback. Additionally this processor can handle intensive workstation, and even full-fledged server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 101%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is outstanding.
Graphics100% is an outstanding 3D score, it's the bee's knees. This GPU can handle almost all 3D games at very high resolutions and ultra detail levels.
Boot Drive204% is an exceptional SSD score. This drive is suitable for heavy workstation use, it will facilitate fast boots, responsive applications and allow for fast transfers of multi-gigabyte files.
Memory32GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's far more than any current game requires. 32GB will also allow for large file and system caches, virtual machine hosting, software development, video editing and batch multimedia processing.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.
SystemGigabyte Z390 AORUS PRO
MotherboardGigabyte Z390 AORUS PRO  (all builds)
Memory25.1 GB free of 32 GB @ 2.1 GHz
Display2560 x 1440 - 32 Bit colors
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20181018
Uptime0 Days
Run DateJul 11 '20 at 03:00
Run Duration222 Seconds
Run User USA-User
Background CPU7%
Watch Gameplay: 2070 + 9600K How to compare your gameplay

 PC Performing as expected (45th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
Intel Core i9-9900K-$399
U3E1, 1 CPU, 8 cores, 16 threads
Base clock 3.6 GHz, turbo 4.7 GHz (avg)
Performing above expectations (78th percentile)
101% Outstanding
Memory 90.8
1-Core 147
2-Core 299
98% 179 Pts
4-Core 595
8-Core 1,109
102% 852 Pts
64-Core 1,601
99% 1,601 Pts
Poor: 89%
This bench: 101%
Great: 104%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
Nvidia RTX 2070-$200
EVGA(3842 2273) ≥ 4GB
CLim: 2100 MHz, MLim: 3500 MHz, Ram: 8GB, Driver: 445.87
Performing below potential (29th percentile) - GPU OC Guide
100% Outstanding
Lighting 126
Reflection 113
Parallax 128
103% 122 fps
MRender 160
Gravity 114
Splatting 91
96% 122 fps
Poor: 93%
This bench: 100%
Great: 112%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Samsung 960 Evo NVMe PCIe M.2 500GB-$140
292GB free (System drive)
Firmware: 3B7QCXE7 Max speed: PCIe 16,000 MB/s
SusWrite @10s intervals: 833 576 581 581 578 574 MB/s
Performing below expectations (34th percentile)
204% Outstanding
Read 1,790
Write 1,622
Mixed 637
SusWrite 620
260% 1,168 MB/s
4K Read 36.2
4K Write 102
4K Mixed 49.5
172% 62.5 MB/s
DQ Read 992
DQ Write 852
DQ Mixed 767
617% 870 MB/s
Poor: 153%
This bench: 204%
Great: 254%
Samsung 860 Evo 1TB-$140
427GB free
Firmware: RVT01B6Q
SusWrite @10s intervals: 469 459 471 472 474 471 MB/s
Performing above expectations (65th percentile)
118% Outstanding
Read 502
Write 471
Mixed 449
SusWrite 470
107% 473 MB/s
4K Read 37.5
4K Write 89.6
4K Mixed 51.7
170% 59.6 MB/s
DQ Read 378
DQ Write 340
DQ Mixed 356
268% 358 MB/s
Poor: 81%
This bench: 118%
Great: 133%
Samsung 860 Evo 250GB-$36
144GB free
Firmware: RVT01B6Q
SusWrite @10s intervals: 343 310 299 299 299 297 MB/s
Performing above expectations (61st percentile)
110% Outstanding
Read 501
Write 474
Mixed 442
SusWrite 308
97% 431 MB/s
4K Read 40.8
4K Write 87.8
4K Mixed 53.1
176% 60.6 MB/s
DQ Read 376
DQ Write 339
DQ Mixed 354
266% 356 MB/s
Poor: 75%
This bench: 110%
Great: 128%
WD My Passport 25E1 2TB
605GB free, PID 25e1
Operating at USB 3.0 Speed
SusWrite @10s intervals: 79 80 81 81 81 80 MB/s
Performing as expected (42nd percentile)
35% Below average
Read 80
Write 82.8
Mixed 50.2
SusWrite 80.2
99% 73.3 MB/s
4K Read 0.5
4K Write 1.9
4K Mixed 0.9
97% 1.1 MB/s
Poor: 16%
This bench: 35%
Great: 61%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Unknown F4-3200C16-8GVKB 04CD F4-3200C16-8GTZR 04CD F4-3200C16-8GVKB 04CD F4-3200C16-8GTZR 32GB
2133, 2133, 2133, 2133 MHz
8192, 8192, 8192, 8192 MB
Performing below potential (10th percentile) - ensure that a dual+ channel XMP BIOS profile is enabled: How to enable XMP
71.8% Very good
MC Read 25.2
MC Write 28
MC Mixed 22
72% 25.1 GB/s
SC Read 16.3
SC Write 29.4
SC Mixed 22
64% 22.6 GB/s
Latency 66
61% 66 ns
Poor: 72%
This bench: 71.8%
Great: 106%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Typical GA-Z390 AORUS PRO-CF Builds (Compare 8,575 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 114%
UFO
Desktop
Desktop 101%
UFO
Workstation
Workstation 105%
UFO

Motherboard: Gigabyte Z390 AORUS PRO - $194

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 118% - Outstanding Total price: $801
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate countless reddit accounts. UserBenchmark’s data exposes their marketing spiel so they systematically attack our reputation.
Why don’t large PC brands support UserBenchmark?
PC brands profit greatly from flagship hardware like the 4090, 14900KS, and 7950X3D. We help users get similar real-world performance for less money.
Why don’t any youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't sponsor youtubers, so they have no incentive to praise us. Moreover, brands pay youtubers extra to promote inferior products but UserBenchmark’s data exposes them.
Why does UserBenchmark have so many negative trustpilot reviews?
Trustpilot hosts user-generated online reviews. It's obvious that the 200+ UserBenchmark reviews, are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users aren't interested in promoting billon-dollar brands.
Why is UserBenchmark so popular with users?
Instead of pursuing lucrative sponsorships with billion-dollar PC brands, we have dedicated 13 years to publishing accurate real-world data. As a result, our users save millions every year and they keep returning.
The Best.
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $170Nvidia RTX 4060 $293Crucial MX500 250GB $39
Intel Core i5-12400F $120Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $361Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-13600K $260Nvidia RTX 4070 $550Samsung 870 Evo 250GB $44
HDDRAMUSB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $37Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $40SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $28Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $48SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $62G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16
If you make a purchase via one of these links, our site may earn a commission
Today's hottest deals
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback