Asrock B450M Gaming

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 80%
Battleship
Desktop
Desktop 100%
Nuclear submarine
Workstation
Workstation 80%
Battleship
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing above expectations (82nd percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 18 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
ProcessorWith an outstanding single core score, this CPU is the cat's whiskers: It demolishes everyday tasks such as web browsing, office apps and audio/video playback. Additionally this processor can handle typical workstation, and even moderate server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 96.2%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is excellent.
Graphics77.1% is a very good 3D score, it's the business. This GPU can handle recent 3D games at high resolutions and ultra detail levels.
Boot Drive259% is an exceptional SSD score. This drive is suitable for heavy workstation use, it will facilitate fast boots, responsive applications and allow for fast transfers of multi-gigabyte files.
Memory32GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's far more than any current game requires. 32GB will also allow for large file and system caches, virtual machine hosting, software development, video editing and batch multimedia processing.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.
Run History
MotherboardAsrock B450M Gaming  (all builds)
Memory18.1 GB free of 32 GB @ 3.2 GHz
Display4096 x 2160 - 32 Bit colors
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20191014
Uptime4.4 Days
Run DateJul 03 '20 at 07:37
Run Duration253 Seconds
Run User USA-User
Background CPU9%
Watch Gameplay: 1660S + 9600K How to compare your gameplay

 PC Performing above expectations (82nd percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
AMD Ryzen 7 3700X-$190
AM4, 1 CPU, 8 cores, 16 threads
Base clock 3.6 GHz, turbo 4.05 GHz (avg)
Performing way above expectations (98th percentile)
96.2% Outstanding
Memory 84.1
1-Core 148
2-Core 295
95% 176 Pts
4-Core 580
8-Core 1,069
99% 825 Pts
64-Core 1,403
87% 1,403 Pts
Poor: 76%
This bench: 96.2%
Great: 94%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
Nvidia GTX 1660S (Super)-$195
CLim: 2130 MHz, MLim: 3500 MHz, Ram: 6GB, Driver: 445.87
Performing way above expectations (99th percentile)
77.1% Very good
Lighting 97
Reflection 87.2
Parallax 82.5
79% 88.9 fps
MRender 121
Gravity 80.1
Splatting 75.3
73% 92.1 fps
Poor: 65%
This bench: 77.1%
Great: 76%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
WD Blue SN550 NVMe PCIe M.2 1TB-$149
685GB free (System drive)
Firmware: 211070WD Max speed: PCIe 16,000 MB/s
SusWrite @10s intervals: 1370 840 842 847 847 849 MB/s
Performing way above expectations (86th percentile)
259% Outstanding
Read 1,594
Write 1,770
Mixed 1,435
SusWrite 933
323% 1,433 MB/s
4K Read 53
4K Write 196
4K Mixed 82.4
290% 110 MB/s
DQ Read 1,214
DQ Write 995
DQ Mixed 1,142
845% 1,117 MB/s
Poor: 164%
This bench: 259%
Great: 276%
Samsung Portable SSD T5 500GB
198GB free
Firmware: 0
SusWrite @10s intervals: 409 410 411 410 410 341 MB/s
Performing above expectations (72nd percentile)
80.5% Excellent
Read 410
Write 410
Mixed 391
SusWrite 399
91% 403 MB/s
4K Read 24.9
4K Write 38.8
4K Mixed 29.9
97% 31.2 MB/s
DQ Read 240
DQ Write 190
DQ Mixed 217
162% 216 MB/s
Poor: 51%
This bench: 80.5%
Great: 97%
Samsung Portable SSD T5 500GB
466GB free
Firmware: 0
SusWrite @10s intervals: 410 410 411 410 411 349 MB/s
Performing above expectations (70th percentile)
79.9% Very good
Read 388
Write 412
Mixed 393
SusWrite 400
90% 398 MB/s
4K Read 25.1
4K Write 38.9
4K Mixed 30.1
97% 31.4 MB/s
DQ Read 240
DQ Write 190
DQ Mixed 218
162% 216 MB/s
Poor: 51%
This bench: 79.9%
Great: 97%
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2018)-$50
2TB free
Firmware: 0001
SusWrite @10s intervals: 212 216 215 217 217 216 MB/s
Relative performance n/a - RAM cached drive detected
Poor: 53% Great: 106%
Seagate Barracuda 7200.12 500GB-$25
466GB free
Firmware: HP34
SusWrite @10s intervals: 120 121 121 122 122 122 MB/s
Performing way above expectations (97th percentile)
71% Very good
Read 126
Write 76.5
Mixed 66.3
SusWrite 121
72% 97.5 MB/s
4K Read 0.7
4K Write 2
4K Mixed 1
177% 1.23 MB/s
Poor: 28%
This bench: 71%
Great: 70%
Lexar SD WorkflowUR2 256GB
166GB free, PID ba0f, Samsung Evo Select
Operating at USB 3.0 Speed
SusWrite @10s intervals: 81 87 87 87 87 87 MB/s
Relative performance n/a - insufficient samples
42.6% Average
Read 92.5
Write 85.2
Mixed 70.3
SusWrite 86.1
112% 83.5 MB/s
4K Read 6.4
4K Write 2.9
4K Mixed 4.5
275% 4.6 MB/s
Poor: 34%
This bench: 42.6%
Great: 44%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Unknown TEAMGROUP-UD4-3200 4x8GB
4 of 4 slots used
32GB DIMM DDR4 clocked @ 3200 MHz
Performing as expected (54th percentile)
91.1% Outstanding
MC Read 37.2
MC Write 23.9
MC Mixed 36.8
93% 32.6 GB/s
SC Read 25.7
SC Write 23.6
SC Mixed 35.4
81% 28.2 GB/s
Latency 73.3
54% 73.3 ns
Poor: 69%
This bench: 91.1%
Great: 109%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Typical B450M Gaming Builds (Compare 628 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 50%
Yacht
Desktop
Desktop 88%
Aircraft carrier
Workstation
Workstation 50%
Yacht

Motherboard: Asrock B450M Gaming

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 83% - Excellent Total price: $370
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate thousands of reddit accounts. We expose their spiel so they attack our reputation.
Why don’t PC brands endorse UserBenchmark?
Brands make boatloads of money on flagships like the 4090 and 14900KS. We help users get similar real-world performance for less.
Why don’t youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't pay youtubers, so they don't praise us. Moreover, our data exposes youtubers that promote overpriced/inferior products.
Why does UserBenchmark have negative trustpilot reviews?
The 200+ trustpilot reviews are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users don't give a monkey's about big brands.
Why is UserBenchmark popular with users?
Instead of pursuing brands for sponsorship, we've spent 13 years publishing real-world data for users.
The Best.
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $174Nvidia RTX 4060 $293Crucial MX500 250GB $39
Intel Core i5-12400F $120Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-13600K $260Nvidia RTX 4070 $549Samsung 870 Evo 250GB $50
HDDRAMUSB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $37Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $39SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $29Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $45SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $62G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16
If you make a purchase via one of these links, our site may earn a commission
Today's hottest deals
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback