Asrock B450M Gaming

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 80%
Aircraft carrier
Desktop
Desktop 100%
Nuclear submarine
Workstation
Workstation 79%
Battleship
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing above expectations (70th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 30 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
ProcessorWith an outstanding single core score, this CPU is the cat's whiskers: It demolishes everyday tasks such as web browsing, office apps and audio/video playback. Additionally this processor can handle typical workstation, and even moderate server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 95.9%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is excellent.
Graphics77.8% is a very good 3D score, it's the business. This GPU can handle recent 3D games at high resolutions and ultra detail levels.
Boot Drive261% is an exceptional SSD score. This drive is suitable for heavy workstation use, it will facilitate fast boots, responsive applications and allow for fast transfers of multi-gigabyte files.
Memory32GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's far more than any current game requires. 32GB will also allow for large file and system caches, virtual machine hosting, software development, video editing and batch multimedia processing.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.
Run History
MotherboardAsrock B450M Gaming  (all builds)
Memory22.9 GB free of 32 GB @ 3.2 GHz
Display4096 x 2160 - 32 Bit colors
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20191014
Uptime3.8 Days
Run DateJul 02 '20 at 17:31
Run Duration251 Seconds
Run User USA-User
Background CPU9%
Watch Gameplay: 1660S + 9600K How to compare your gameplay

 PC Performing above expectations (70th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
AMD Ryzen 7 3700X-$206
AM4, 1 CPU, 8 cores, 16 threads
Base clock 3.6 GHz, turbo 4.1 GHz (avg)
Performing way above expectations (98th percentile)
95.9% Outstanding
Memory 84.2
1-Core 148
2-Core 300
96% 178 Pts
4-Core 577
8-Core 978
94% 777 Pts
64-Core 1,406
87% 1,406 Pts
Poor: 76%
This bench: 95.9%
Great: 94%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
Nvidia GTX 1660S (Super)-$238
CLim: 2130 MHz, MLim: 3500 MHz, Ram: 6GB, Driver: 445.87
Performing way above expectations (99th percentile)
77.8% Very good
Lighting 98
Reflection 87.9
Parallax 82.9
80% 89.6 fps
MRender 118
Gravity 80.6
Splatting 78.2
74% 92.2 fps
Poor: 65%
This bench: 77.8%
Great: 76%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
WD Blue SN550 NVMe PCIe M.2 1TB-$74
690GB free (System drive)
Firmware: 211070WD Max speed: PCIe 16,000 MB/s
SusWrite @10s intervals: 1408 840 846 848 851 848 MB/s
Performing way above expectations (86th percentile)
261% Outstanding
Read 1,565
Write 1855
Mixed 1,478
SusWrite 940
329% 1,460 MB/s
4K Read 53.9
4K Write 197
4K Mixed 82.9
292% 111 MB/s
DQ Read 1,244
DQ Write 1,036
DQ Mixed 1,165
866% 1,148 MB/s
Poor: 164%
This bench: 261%
Great: 276%
Samsung Portable SSD T5 500GB
198GB free
Firmware: 0
SusWrite @10s intervals: 210 210 210 210 210 210 MB/s
Performing below expectations (29th percentile)
68.5% Good
Read 410
Write 411
Mixed 391
SusWrite 210
80% 355 MB/s
4K Read 24.8
4K Write 38.8
4K Mixed 29.4
96% 31 MB/s
DQ Read 233
DQ Write 186
DQ Mixed 206
155% 208 MB/s
Poor: 51%
This bench: 68.5%
Great: 97%
Samsung Portable SSD T5 500GB
466GB free
Firmware: 0
SusWrite @10s intervals: 210 210 210 210 210 210 MB/s
Performing below expectations (26th percentile)
67.3% Good
Read 383
Write 411
Mixed 392
SusWrite 210
79% 349 MB/s
4K Read 24.8
4K Write 38.6
4K Mixed 29.5
96% 31 MB/s
DQ Read 233
DQ Write 182
DQ Mixed 206
154% 207 MB/s
Poor: 51%
This bench: 67.3%
Great: 97%
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2018)-$50
2TB free
Firmware: 0001
SusWrite @10s intervals: 210 215 216 216 216 214 MB/s
Relative performance n/a - RAM cached drive detected
Poor: 53% Great: 106%
Seagate Barracuda 7200.12 500GB-$36
466GB free
Firmware: HP34
SusWrite @10s intervals: 121 121 120 121 124 120 MB/s
Performing way above expectations (96th percentile)
70.4% Very good
Read 124
Write 120
Mixed 69.7
SusWrite 121
80% 109 MB/s
4K Read 0.7
4K Write 2
4K Mixed 1.1
188% 1.27 MB/s
Poor: 28%
This bench: 70.4%
Great: 70%
Lexar SD WorkflowUR2 256GB
166GB free, PID ba0f
Operating at USB 3.0 Speed
SusWrite @10s intervals: 78 87 87 87 87 87 MB/s
Relative performance n/a - insufficient samples
43.8% Average
Read 92.5
Write 85
Mixed 69
SusWrite 85.7
112% 83.1 MB/s
4K Read 10.6
4K Write 3
4K Mixed 4.2
284% 5.93 MB/s
Poor: 34%
This bench: 43.8%
Great: 44%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Unknown TEAMGROUP-UD4-3200 4x8GB
4 of 4 slots used
32GB DIMM DDR4 clocked @ 3200 MHz
Performing as expected (54th percentile)
91.9% Outstanding
MC Read 37.5
MC Write 23.9
MC Mixed 37.3
94% 32.9 GB/s
SC Read 26
SC Write 23.7
SC Mixed 36.3
82% 28.7 GB/s
Latency 73.1
55% 73.1 ns
Poor: 69%
This bench: 91.9%
Great: 109%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Typical B450M Gaming Builds (Compare 624 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 50%
Yacht
Desktop
Desktop 88%
Aircraft carrier
Workstation
Workstation 50%
Yacht

Motherboard: Asrock B450M Gaming

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 86% - Excellent Total price: $370
The Best.
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-13600K $273Nvidia RTX 4060 $280Crucial MX500 250GB $39
Intel Core i5-12400F $128Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-12600K $160Nvidia RTX 4070 $550Samsung 870 Evo 250GB $29
HDDRAMUSB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $39Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $39SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $32Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $48SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $62G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16
If you make a purchase via one of these links, our site may earn a commission
Today's hottest deals
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback