MSI X99A GODLIKE GAMING CARBON (MS-7883)

Performance Results


Gaming 87% Aircraft carrier	Desktop 86% Aircraft carrier	Workstation 84% Aircraft carrier


PC Status	Overall this PC is performing below expectations (31st percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 69 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components. Use the charts in the benchmark sections of this report to identify problem areas.
Processor	With a brilliant single core score, this CPU is the business: It demolishes everyday tasks such as web browsing, office apps and audio/video playback. Additionally this processor can handle moderate workstation, and even light server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 79.8%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is good.
Graphics	102% is an outstanding 3D score, it's the bee's knees. This GPU can handle almost all 3D games at very high resolutions and ultra detail levels.
Boot Drive	142% is an exceptional SSD score. This drive is suitable for heavy workstation use, it will facilitate fast boots, responsive applications and allow for fast transfers of multi-gigabyte files.
Memory	64GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's far more than any current game requires. 64GB will also allow for large file and system caches, virtual machine hosting, software development, video editing and batch multimedia processing.
OS Version	Although Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.

System	MSI MS-7883
Motherboard	MSI X99A GODLIKE GAMING CARBON (MS-7883) (all builds)
Memory	39.8 GB free of 64 GB @ 3 GHz
Display	3840 x 2160 - 32 Bit colors
OS	Windows 10
BIOS Date	20180615
Uptime	2.3 Days
Run Date	Jul 23 '22 at 23:28
Run Duration	284 Seconds
Run User	CAN-User
Background CPU	8%

Watch Gameplay: 1080 + 9600K How to compare your gameplay

PC Performing below expectations (31^st percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor	Bench	Normal	Heavy	Server
Intel Core i7-6900K-$120 6,755 User benchmarks, average bench 86% SOCKET 0, 1 CPU, 8 cores, 16 threads Base clock 3.2 GHz, turbo 3.45 GHz (avg) Performing below expectations (21^st percentile)	79.8% Very good	Memory 79.8 1-Core 116 2-Core 223 78% 140 Pts	4-Core 428 8-Core 739 71% 584 Pts	64-Core 1,133 70% 1,133 Pts
Poor: 76% ↑ This bench: 79.8% Great: 98%

Graphics Card	Bench	3D DX9	3D DX10	3D DX11
Nvidia GTX 1080-$400 1,082,454 User benchmarks, average bench 102% Zotac(19DA 1425) ≥ 4GB CLim: 1911 MHz, MLim: 2502 MHz, Ram: 8GB, Driver: 472.47 Performing below potential (51^st percentile) - GPU OC Guide	102% Outstanding	Lighting 128 Reflection 138 Parallax 130 105% 132 fps	MRender 116 Gravity 134 Splatting 117 100% 122 fps
Poor: 93% ↑ This bench: 102% Great: 110%

Drives	Bench	Sequential	Random 4k	Deep queue 4k
APS-SE20G-2T 2TB 707 User benchmarks, average bench 241% 770GB free (System drive) Firmware: ECFM22.5 SusWrite @10s intervals: 691 679 668 666 646 664 MB/s Performing way below expectations (2^nd percentile)	142% Outstanding	Read 594 Write 629 Mixed 630 SusWrite 669 143% 630 MB/s	4K Read 35.9 4K Write 79.1 4K Mixed 51.8 163% 55.6 MB/s	DQ Read 677 DQ Write 503 DQ Mixed 578 435% 586 MB/s
Poor: 157% ↑ This bench: 142% Great: 314%
Intel Raid 1 Volume 4TB 18 User benchmarks, average bench 190% 687GB free Firmware: 1.0. SusWrite @10s intervals: 141 40 59 351 351 349 MB/s Performing way below expectations (14^th percentile)	86.6% Excellent	Read 1,120 Write 41.4 Mixed 74.2 SusWrite 215 77% 363 MB/s	4K Read 21.6 4K Write 24.4 4K Mixed 19.8 71% 21.9 MB/s	DQ Read 264 DQ Write 39.1 DQ Mixed 62.7 69% 122 MB/s
Poor: 80% ↑ This bench: 86.6% Great: 281%
WD Green 2TB (2012)-$49 170,877 User benchmarks, average bench 64% 1TB free Firmware: 80.00A80 SusWrite @10s intervals: 136 138 136 140 140 140 MB/s Performing way above expectations (90^th percentile)	80.4% Excellent	Read 142 Write 128 Mixed 89.9 SusWrite 138 92% 125 MB/s	4K Read 1 4K Write 2.5 4K Mixed 1 199% 1.5 MB/s
Poor: 40% ↑ This bench: 80.4% Great: 84%
Lexar SD WorkflowUR2 64GB 5 User benchmarks, average bench 37% 59GB free, PID ba0f Operating at USB 3.0 Speed SusWrite @10s intervals: 47 49 48 43 42 41 MB/s Performing below expectations (30^th percentile)	34.1% Below average	Read 87.9 Write 60.1 Mixed 54.5 SusWrite 45.1 79% 61.9 MB/s	4K Read 5.8 4K Write 3.3 4K Mixed 4.3 280% 4.47 MB/s
Poor: 24% ↑ This bench: 34.1% Great: 49%
Lexar SD WorkflowUR2 256GB 3 User benchmarks, average bench 40% 189GB free, PID ba0f Operating at USB 3.0 Speed SusWrite @10s intervals: 55 57 57 49 49 50 MB/s Relative performance n/a - insufficient samples	34.4% Below average	Read 89.8 Write 35.7 Mixed 67.2 SusWrite 53 78% 61.4 MB/s	4K Read 6.3 4K Write 2.7 4K Mixed 4.3 262% 4.43 MB/s
Poor: 34% ↑ This bench: 34.4% Great: 44%
Lexar SD WorkflowUR2 394GB 351GB free, PID ba0f Operating at USB 3.0 Speed SusWrite @10s intervals: 53 56 50 48 48 49 MB/s Relative performance n/a - insufficient samples	33.5% Below average	Read 85.3 Write 78.4 Mixed 58.5 SusWrite 50.8 90% 68.2 MB/s	4K Read 4.9 4K Write 2.9 4K Mixed 3.7 243% 3.83 MB/s

Lexar SD WorkflowUR2 32GB 3 User benchmarks, average bench 36% 15GB free, PID ba0f Operating at USB 3.0 Speed SusWrite @10s intervals: 50 50 54 48 48 46 MB/s Relative performance n/a - insufficient samples	40.3% Average	Read 130 Write 45.3 Mixed 29.5 SusWrite 49.4 71% 63.7 MB/s	4K Read 11 4K Write 2.6 4K Mixed 1 163% 4.87 MB/s
Poor: 27% ↑ This bench: 40.3% Great: 40%
Lexar SD WorkflowUR2 256GB 3 User benchmarks, average bench 40% 216GB free, PID ba0f Operating at USB 3.0 Speed SusWrite @10s intervals: 54 55 55 48 48 49 MB/s Relative performance n/a - insufficient samples	36.4% Below average	Read 88 Write 80.9 Mixed 69.7 SusWrite 51.5 96% 72.5 MB/s	4K Read 8.4 4K Write 3.4 4K Mixed 4.7 307% 5.5 MB/s
Poor: 34% ↑ This bench: 36.4% Great: 44%
Lexar SD WorkflowUR2 256GB 3 User benchmarks, average bench 40% 144GB free, PID ba0f Operating at USB 3.0 Speed SusWrite @10s intervals: 53 56 56 48 48 49 MB/s Relative performance n/a - insufficient samples	37.7% Below average	Read 89.3 Write 81.8 Mixed 69 SusWrite 51.9 96% 73 MB/s	4K Read 8.6 4K Write 3.7 4K Mixed 5.1 331% 5.8 MB/s
Poor: 34% ↑ This bench: 37.7% Great: 44%
Drobo 5D3 17.5TB 15 User benchmarks, average bench 78% 6TB free, PID 3533 SusWrite @10s intervals: 79 76 73 68 66 68 MB/s Performing way below expectations (10^th percentile)	48.1% Average	Read 63 Write 241 Mixed 134 SusWrite 71.7 190% 127 MB/s	4K Read 2.4 4K Write 7.4 4K Mixed 2.5 346% 4.1 MB/s
Poor: 48% ↑ This bench: 48.1% Great: 119%
Drobo 5D3 17.5TB 15 User benchmarks, average bench 78% 12.5TB free, PID 3533 SusWrite @10s intervals: 78 76 73 68 66 68 MB/s Performing way below expectations (10^th percentile)	47.2% Average	Read 51.5 Write 238 Mixed 121 SusWrite 71.6 182% 121 MB/s	4K Read 3.2 4K Write 7.6 4K Mixed 3.1 376% 4.63 MB/s
Poor: 48% ↑ This bench: 47.2% Great: 119%
Drobo 5C 70.5TB 404 User benchmarks, average bench 60% 58TB free, PID 3443 SusWrite @10s intervals: 38 38 39 39 39 39 MB/s Performing way below expectations (15^th percentile)	29.7% Poor	Read 37.2 Write 38.2 Mixed 37.1 SusWrite 38.5 52% 37.8 MB/s	4K Read 2.5 4K Write 5 4K Mixed 0.7 203% 2.73 MB/s
Poor: 25% ↑ This bench: 29.7% Great: 89%

Memory Kit	Bench	Multi core	Single core	Latency
Corsair Dominator DDR4 3000 C15 4x16GB-$530 133 User benchmarks, average bench 99% 4 of 8 slots used 64GB DIMM DDR4 3000 MHz clocked @ 2133 MHz Performing below potential (72^nd percentile) - Ensure that the top XMP BIOS profile is enabled: How to enable XMP	114% Outstanding	MC Read 46.3 MC Write 48.2 MC Mixed 40.9 129% 45.1 GB/s	SC Read 13.6 SC Write 19.8 SC Mixed 20.2 51% 17.9 GB/s	Latency 80.9 49% 80.9 ns
Poor: 70% ↑ This bench: 114% Great: 147%

Take a copy of your results

System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Custom PC Builder (Explore upgrades for this PC) Build your perfect PC: compare component prices, popularity, speed and value for money

CHOOSE AN UPGRADE:

CPU

GPU

SSD

HDD

RAM

MBD

Typical X99A GODLIKE GAMING CARBON (MS-7883) Builds (Compare 239 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings

Gaming 90%

Nuclear submarine

Desktop 92%

Nuclear submarine

Workstation 82%

Aircraft carrier

Motherboard: MSI X99A GODLIKE GAMING CARBON (MS-7883)

CPU
Core i7-6850KIntel $115Bench 84%, 29,279 samples	60x
Core i7-6800KIntel $103Bench 81%, 50,196 samples	37x
Core i7-5960XIntel $285Bench 80%, 15,468 samples	36x

GPU
GTX 1080Nvidia $400Bench 102%, 1,082,454 samples	49x
GTX 1080-TiNvidia $499Bench 124%, 840,268 samples	38x
GTX 980-TiNvidia $560Bench 79%, 214,030 samples	12x

SSD
970 Evo NVMe PCIe M.2 1TBSamsung $158Bench 297%, 331,647 samples	17x
950 NVMe PCIe M.2 512GBSamsung $625Bench 223%, 54,978 samples	12x
970 Evo Plus NVMe PCIe M.2 1TBSamsung $76Bench 310%, 455,997 samples	10x

RAM
CMW16GX4M2C3200C16 4x8GBCorsairBench 92%, 92,358 samples	10x
F4-3000C14-16GTZ F4-3000C15-8GTZ F4-3000C14-16GTZ F4-3000C15-8GTZ F4-3000C14-16GTZ F4-3000C15-8GTZ F4-3000C14-16GTZ F4-3000C15-8GTZ 96GBUnknownBench 120%, 7 samples	7x
F4 DDR4 3200 C16 4x8GBG.SKILLBench 92%, 30,689 samples	5x

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER

Value: 72% - Very good

Total price: $673

CPU	GPU	SSD
Intel Core i5-13600K $273	Nvidia RTX 4060 $300	Crucial MX500 250GB $40
Intel Core i5-12400F $134	Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385	Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-12600K $186	Nvidia RTX 4070 $409	Samsung 860 Evo 250GB $52

HDD	RAM	USB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $34	Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $40	SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $35	Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $43	SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $51	G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351	SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16