Asrock FM2A75 Pro4

Performance Results


Gaming 11% Tree trunk	Desktop 45% Speed boat	Workstation 9% Tree trunk


PC Status	Overall this PC is performing way below expectations (14th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 86 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components. Use the charts in the benchmark sections of this report to identify problem areas.
Processor	With a relatively low single core score, this CPU can handle email, light web browsing and basic audio/video playback, but it will struggle to handle CPU intensive tasks. Finally, with a gaming score of 29.8%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is very poor.
Graphics	30.1% is a below average 3D score (RTX 2060S = 100%). This GPU can handle older games but it will struggle to render recent games at resolutions greater than 1080p. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Boot Drive	23% is an extremely low SSD score, this system will benefit from a faster SSD.
Memory	8GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's sufficient for the vast majority of games. 8GB is also enough for moderate file and system caches which result in a very responsive system.
OS Version	Although Windows 8.1 is a recent version of Windows, it's worth upgrading to Windows 10 which has had several improvements made to the user interface including a better homescreen.

Very high background CPU (86%). High background CPU reduces benchmark accuracy. How to reduce background CPU.

Run History

4 years ago, 4 years ago, 4 years ago, 4 years ago, 3 years ago.

Motherboard	Asrock FM2A75 Pro4 (all builds)
Memory	5.5 GB free of 8 GB @ 0.8 GHz
Display	1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit colori
OS	Windows 8.1
BIOS Date	20121018
Uptime	0 Days
Run Date	Jun 24 '20 at 15:01
Run Duration	209 Seconds
Run User	ITA-User
Background CPU	86%

PC Performing way below expectations (14^th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor	Bench	Normal	Heavy	Server
AMD A8-5600K APU-$250 14,744 User benchmarks, average bench 49% CPUSocket, 1 CPU, 1 cores, 2 threads Base clock 3.6 GHz, turbo 3.6 GHz (avg) Performing way below expectations (4^th percentile)	29.8% Poor	Memory 46.9 1-Core 46.1 2-Core 65.2 34% 52.7 Pts	4-Core 72.5 8-Core 91.1 10% 81.8 Pts	64-Core 75 5% 75 Pts
Poor: 34% ↑ This bench: 29.8% Great: 59%

Graphics Card	Bench	3D DX9	3D DX10	3D DX11
Nvidia GTX 780-$329 50,279 User benchmarks, average bench 45% Palit(1569 1004) 3GB CLim: 1241 MHz, MLim: 1502 MHz, Ram: 3GB, Driver: 445.87 Relative performance (0^th percentile) - GPU OC Guide	30.1% Below average	Lighting 33 Reflection 35.7 Parallax 43.6 27% 37.5 fps	MRender 52.3 Gravity 50.4 Splatting 34.3 36% 45.7 fps
Poor: 41% ↑ This bench: 30.1% Great: 49%

Drives	Bench	Sequential	Random 4k	Deep queue 4k
Samsung 840 120GB-$109 51,792 User benchmarks, average bench 61% 34GB free (System drive) Firmware: DXT07B0Q SusWrite @10s intervals: 30 38 44 27 51 53 MB/s Relative performance (0^th percentile) - Ensure that this drive is connected to a SATA 3.0 port with a SATA 3.0 cable	23% Poor	Read 220 Write 90 Mixed 50.1 SusWrite 40.5 22% 100 MB/s	4K Read 6.8 4K Write 22.6 4K Mixed 2.1 25% 10.5 MB/s	DQ Read 163 DQ Write 55.2 DQ Mixed 39.9 48% 86 MB/s
Poor: 46% ↑ This bench: 23% Great: 73%
WD Green 1TB (2009)-$72 103,919 User benchmarks, average bench 42% 209GB free Firmware: 01.01A01 SusWrite @10s intervals: 23 39 38 23 49 55 MB/s Performing way below expectations (15^th percentile)	30.5% Below average	Read 68 Write 68.5 Mixed 53.5 SusWrite 37.9 42% 57 MB/s	4K Read 0.4 4K Write 1.7 4K Mixed 0.6 115% 0.9 MB/s
Poor: 23% ↑ This bench: 30.5% Great: 57%
Toshiba External USB HDD 320GB 173 User benchmarks, average bench 16% 245GB free, PID a001 Operating at USB 2.0 Speed SusWrite @10s intervals: 10 16 15 11 18 22 MB/s Performing way below expectations (4^th percentile)	8.79% Terrible	Read 28.5 Write 24 Mixed 17.8 SusWrite 15.4 28% 21.4 MB/s	4K Read 0.3 4K Write 0.4 4K Mixed 0.1 18% 0.27 MB/s
Poor: 10% ↑ This bench: 8.79% Great: 19%
TrekStor DS pocket light 1TB 41 User benchmarks, average bench 14% 499GB free, PID 003a Operating at USB 2.0 Speed SusWrite @10s intervals: 11 17 17 11 19 24 MB/s Performing way below expectations (18^th percentile)	10.3% Very poor	Read 20.5 Write 14.7 Mixed 20.2 SusWrite 16.4 24% 18 MB/s	4K Read 0.3 4K Write 1.2 4K Mixed 0.4 56% 0.63 MB/s
Poor: 10% ↑ This bench: 10.3% Great: 19%
Kingston DataTraveler 2.0 32GB 6,921 User benchmarks, average bench 6% 28GB free, PID 6545 Operating at USB 2.0 Speed SusWrite @10s intervals: 3.9 3.6 2.9 5.6 6 6.5 MB/s Performing as expected (41^st percentile)	4.58% Terrible	Read 19.5 Write 19.7 Mixed 7.8 SusWrite 4.7 16% 12.9 MB/s	4K Read 3.1 4K Write 0 4K Mixed 0 12% 1.03 MB/s
Poor: 4% ↑ This bench: 4.58% Great: 8%

Memory Kit	Bench	Multi core	Single core	Latency
Unknown CL11-11-11 D3-1600 CL11-11-11 D3-1600 8GB 169 User benchmarks, average bench 34% 800, 800 MHz 4096, 4096 MB Performing way below expectations (3^rd percentile)	19.7% Very poor	MC Read 7.9 MC Write 4.9 MC Mixed 7.1 19% 6.63 GB/s	SC Read 6.3 SC Write 5.3 SC Mixed 7.6 18% 6.4 GB/s	Latency 173 23% 173 ns
Poor: 22% ↑ This bench: 19.7% Great: 45%

Take a copy of your results How to check your in-game FPS

System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Custom PC Builder (Explore upgrades for this PC) Build your perfect PC: compare component prices, popularity, speed and value for money

CHOOSE AN UPGRADE:

CPU

GPU

SSD

HDD

RAM

MBD

Typical FM2A75 Pro4 Builds (Compare 32 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings

Gaming 12%

Tree trunk

Desktop 61%

Destroyer

Workstation 9%

Tree trunk

Motherboard: Asrock FM2A75 Pro4 - $128

CPU
A10-5800K APU (2012 D.Tr)AMD $119Bench 50%, 18,312 samples	8x
A8-5600K APUAMD $250Bench 49%, 14,744 samples	7x
Athlon II X4 750KAMD $45Bench 51%, 5,882 samples	4x

GPU
RX 570AMD $130Bench 45%, 473,685 samples	4x
RX 580AMD $120Bench 52%, 360,351 samples	3x
Radeon HD 7660DAMDBench 5%, 7,665 samples	2x

SSD
A400 240GBKingston $28Bench 66%, 424,288 samples	3x
SSDNow UV400 120GBKingston $35Bench 67%, 80,916 samples	2x
SSDNow V300 120GBKingston $36Bench 54%, 339,020 samples	2x

RAM
HyperX DDR3 1600 C9 1x4GBKingstonBench 28%, 5,300 samples	2x
F3-17000CL11-4GBSR F3-17000CL9-4GBXM F3-17000CL9-4GBXM F3-17000CL11-4GBSR 16GBUnknownBench 43%, 2 samples	2x
HyperX DDR3 2400 C11 2x4GBKingstonBench 56%, 9,036 samples	1x

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER

Value: 68% - Good

Total price: $405

CPU	GPU	SSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $175	Nvidia RTX 4060 $293	Crucial MX500 250GB $39
Intel Core i5-12400F $124	Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385	Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-13600K $260	Nvidia RTX 4070 $549	Samsung 870 Evo 250GB $45

HDD	RAM	USB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $37	Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $40	SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $39	Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $48	SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $62	G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351	SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16